The Associated Press

The prices keep going up and up and up...

Featured Topic | Posted 1 year 40 weeks ago

Should oil companies be subject to a "windfall profits" tax?

Exxon Mobil announced its first-quarter profit last week -- $10.9 billion, up 17 percent from a year ago and very nearly a record for the company. This at a time when consumers are feeling the pain of record-high prices at gasoline pump.

Barack Obama has proposed reviving an old idea from the last energy crisis: A "windfall profits" tax on any oil company deemed to have overlarge profits. And he's backed by Sen. Charles Schumer, who had this reaction to the Exxon profits: "Once again, consumers' pain is Exxon's gain. Oil companies are racking up obscene profits left and right while American families are stretched to the limit by skyrocketing gas prices. It's high time for Big Oil to pay its fair share."

Is a "windfall profits" tax the right idea? Or will it create other problems?

Read More

Ben likes: Windfall profits for dummies

Wall Street Journal

Exxon's profits are soaring with the recent oil price spike, but the energy industry's earnings aren't as outsized as the politicians seem to think. Thomson Financial calculates that profits from the oil and natural gas industry over the past year were 8.3% of investment, while the all-industry average is 7.8%. And this was a boom year for oil. An analysis by the Cato Institute's Jerry Taylor finds that between 1970 and 2003 (which includes peak and valley years for earnings) the oil and gas business was "less profitable than the rest of the U.S. economy." These are hardly robber barons.

This tiff over gas and oil taxes only highlights the intellectual policy confusion – or perhaps we should say cynicism – of our politicians. They want lower prices but don't want more production to increase supply. They want oil "independence" but they've declared off limits most of the big sources of domestic oil that could replace foreign imports. They want Americans to use less oil to reduce greenhouse gases but they protest higher oil prices that reduce demand. They want more oil company investment but they want to confiscate the profits from that investment. And these folks want to be President?

Read More

Joel likes: Levy is needed on oil profit windfalls

David Lazarus/Los Angeles Times

After thinking about it a bit, I suppose I have to grudgingly acknowledge that a windfall profits tax isn't the solution. Like many people, I find the oil companies' profits obscene. But they don't control the market, and, yes, they're in business to make money for shareholders. But that doesn't mean they're totally off the hook. Subsidies? Sayonara. The last thing these guys need are tax breaks. Lawmakers should immediately terminate all government programs that give the oil industry unfair (and unnecessary) advantages.

And like Spider-Man says, with great power comes great responsibility. The oil companies should be required to devote a specific amount of their annual profit to public transportation and alternative energy projects.

Call that a tax if you like. I see it as a recognition of the companies' enormous potential to have a positive effect on society, rather than just being first-class riders on the economic gravy train.

Read More

Where do you stand on this issue?

Click on the graph to cast your vote.
average
vote
your vote