
"Divisive" or "descriptive"? Jeremiah Wright talks to reporters at the National Press Club.
The Wright stuff? Obama's ex-pastor goes on tour
Barack Obama's former pastor is making the rounds... and stirring up more controversy for the Democratic presidential candidate. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright said Monday that he will try to change national policy by “coming after” Obama if he is elected president. And on Sunday, the pastor told the audience at a NAACP dinner that "African and African-American children have a different way of learning" from white children.
Wright implied Obama still agrees with him by saying: “He had to distance himself, because he's a politician, from what the media was saying I had said, which was [portrayed as] anti-American.” Wright, who was Obama’s pastor for 20 years and performed his wedding, made the explosive comment during a chaotic question-and-answer session at the National Press Club in Washington, following the pastor’s remarks about the black church in America. “I said to Barack Obama last year, ‘If you get elected, November the 5th I'm coming after you, because you'll be representing a government whose policies grind under people,’ Wright said.
What do Wright's remarks say about Obama? Is Wright a racist? Are his observations about race and education in America divisive or, as Wright put it, "descriptive"? Should Wright be denounced or debated?















Thoughts
re: chris wallace/Fox interview
Submitted on April 29th, 2008 by John 2000I thought, in support of Fox's "Fair & Balanced" mantra, that this interview was quite good for Obama overall. Even though questions were posed in a somewhat softball manner and often lacked follow-up, a number of the tougher questions were broached. (Of course, there are real time-limit constraints). As a pretty good politician, Obama was able to find the proper phrases to adequately walk around the edges while appearing thoughtful, and reasonably relaxed, and confident. I thought the questions were fairly broad. I thought it was a win for both Obama and for Fox.
Here is a simple question (from a simple guy) :
Do you suppose that Mr Obama vis-a-vis racial problems/issues would really have been better served if indeed Fox had held back from breaking the topics open until August, September, October, or even post-election? Has Fox given Obama a break in the long haul?
It's a thing...
Submitted on April 29th, 2008 by Monkey DavidDo Rev. Wright and Rev. Sharpton want to stop Obama?
Well, look at it this way:
1 - Obama's nomination would fundamentally change the dynamic that to be a leader of the black community you need to follow the MLK model and have that "Rev." before your name.
2 - Obama's election to the presidency would do serious damage to the animating myth of these reverends--that the United States is a fundamentally racist country, looking to do violence (economic and physical) to blacks at every opportunity.
3 - Worst of all, a President Obama would mean that the structure where there are many people who could claim leadership of the "black community" (whatever that actually means) would be shattered. There would be only one real leader, and he would be the leader of the whole country, not just a range of skin tones.
So what do you think the Reverends really want?
Potential Picture Comment Opportunity
Submitted on April 29th, 2008 by RespectfulguestNeed to lighten up this Rev Wright thing today, just tired of hearing about it, although I do believe in general Senator Obama did a nice job in the Fox, Mike Wallace interview and should engage more of the tougher venues. Repeated appearances on The View, Ellen, Oprah etc.. make him look well, soft. Like Senator Obama or not, in Mike Wallace interview he was challenged responded with emotion and came off as a leader.
As for picture comment for Rev Wright above.. "Hit me Barack, I'm wide open". Ok, pretty weak.
strange days
Submitted on April 29th, 2008 by John 2000Having seen part of Moyer's coming out party as well as the entirety of the NAACP and Press sessions, I am really left scratching my head. It is as though the quite entertaining and obviously gifted man, Mr Wright, is inhabited by multiple personalities. I think he comes across as way too clever and self-indulgent to even begin to appreciate the impact he casts onto Mr Obama. He comes across as a megalomaniac.
Hey, I enjoyed his gigs. There is too much devil-child-saint-abaser for me to clearly see where he has and continues to severely damage Obama. I just sense it strongly. Whether one thinks it fair or not, I think it is a fact. These three days have to be regarded as very unsettling.
Why has he done this, over and above his obvious self-worship? Could there be a cold rational reason to this? Could his 'black right-brained feeling' logic simply not realize that he does not want Obama to be successful in gaining the presidency because it would yank a major plank out from under his own understanding of reality.
"Obama, you ruined my case!" I don't know.
When a market is uncertain, people tend to sell. Mr Wright has only served to increase the uncertainty.
You know Reverend Wright is helping my faith...
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by Chuck_JohnsonThe more and more Wright speaks the more and more I'm coming to believe that God is a member of the G.O.P.
Exit question: How much is the Hillary Clinton machine paying him?
Chuck Johnson is a student at Claremont McKenna College. Feel free to contact him.
Michelle The angry Black Woman Test!
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by AnonymousMichelle Obama is difficult for anyone to control! She spoke in Indiana recently!
I thought that Michelle Obama had become less prominent on the campaign trail, but on Friday she spoke at a rally in Fort Wayne, Indiana. C-SPAN broadcst the speech last night. It seemed to go on forever, but the seeming length was proportional to the pain inflicted by listening to it.
By contrast with Barack Obama, Michelle Obama doesn't know the words and won't learn the music of American politics. She therefore does not wear well. While she preaches the gospel according to Barack, she wears resentment and bitterness on her sleeve. In her Fort Wayne speech she expanded on the condescending political sociology that Barack Obama preached at his closed-door fundraiser with the San Francisco Democrats.
Given the modesty of her and her husband's family backgrounds, Mrs. Obama denied that she or her husband could be elitists. Yet her political sociology is the mother's milk of those such as the San Francisco Democrats to whom Barack Obama preached. Apparently Mrs. Obama believes that only those born to wealth are capable of looking down their noses at their fellow citizens. In her case the proposition is self-refuting.
Barack wasn't born with "silver spoons" in his mouth, she said. And nobody knows the trouble they've seen. The burden of paying for her undergraduate education at Princeton and her law school education at Harvard remains a motif of her stump speech. No one is granted a chance to ask her if she thought about attending the University of Illinois, or if she's grateful for any of the financial assistance that facilitated her and her husband's attendance at the finest institutions of higher learning in the United States.
Mrs. Obama omitted her admonition to the Los Angeles disciples of Barack from her current iteration of the gospel she preached in Indiana:
Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.
As long as Senator Obama won't require us to listen to the missus, I might be willing to settle for the compulsory mental readjustments.
Rev. Wright
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by molly2005I think my job as an American who loves this country and what it stands for, needs to be cautious of Reverand Wright. I'm not prejudice and personally don't understand the extreme people will go to to express their dislike, hate,etc. of other races, and I don't exclude Rev Wright from this statement.I'm not so sure he does separate good from evil.....I think maybe it's whichever draws the biggest crowd and the most attention or can give him the largest platform. If we're Christ followers,then expressions of love and forgiveness will go alot further.
thanks for the insult
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by justible"close enough to give skeptical white voters an excuse."
Nice. Yep, all us non apologetic whiteys are just latent racists looking for an excuse. If whitey McCain had a whitey pastor of 20 years (in the church where he was married and his children were baptized) saying the kind of vitriol Wright says, they'd have lynched McCain by now. Oops. I said a word that I no longer own.
Rev. Wright
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by AnonymousEverything that Wright said today to Meet the Press was right on target.
He will attack any unjust system or law, that is not for the good of all the people of this country. I have said and preached the same thing.
Wright is not against Obama, nor am I.
Here is a man that knows how to separate good from evil and people who are prejudice will never understand or like Truth, when they hear it.
Can his views be both?
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by chief28.retOne of the questions above is: "Are his observations about race and education in America divisive or, as Wright put it, "descriptive"?
I think they are both...let's face it, many of the things the "good" pastor has said are very divisive. But the fact that many percieve them to be true, and that it is a reality that many Blacks still struggle under the enormous shroud of racism (that many white people cannot ever understand), makes it both.
That does not excuse his hate filled rantings and anti-American rhetoric, but does bring into sharp contrast just how far we have (or have not) come. How far have we come anyway...perhaps we should ask the Groom and Bride?
Obama
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by AnonymousBitter black bitter white man, either way we loose. The political system is soooooo screeewd up that no will ever change it. Fact is you cant, Faor to many lawyers making laws to prevent the change of the gaurd so to speak. President is getting his rights taken away more every day, Congress said NO to line item veto. They said its illegal and takes away rights. Whos???
Sorry this place we once called the land of the free is fadding fast.
Take that to your room Thank You. Just a thought.
THANK YOU PASTOR WRIGHT
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by AnonymousThrough YOU Pastor Wright the American people have gotten a TRUE PICTURE of OBAMA and what he REALLY believes in and we may yet avoid the biggest mistake since re-electing GWB.
Pastor Wright is a BITTER man---not a generational thing at all if Obama and his Mrs can sit there for 20 years and consider him part of their family.
We don't NEED a bitter black man running our country. What happened to his being proud of his WHITE HERITAGE since his black-African father ran out on his WHITE American mother. ?
Confusion say...
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by rom12921"...Angry Black Man often rejected by more conservative white voters." Obama does not appear angry to me. Wright is not running for office. Who is the this man?
Why would conservative voters vote for a more socialist (liberal) candidate anyway?