It speaks to their anti-intellectualism and fundamental misunderstanding of science that for the makers of Expelled (and ID advocates more generally) the answer "we don't know yet" is a badge of shame. "We don't know yet" is what defines the fruitful frontier for science; it is what directs scientists' curiosity and motivates them to spend years on research. Research starts where knowledge and certainty drop off. It's one of the many ironies of "Expelled" that Ben Stein says he wants this movie to free people to ask questions about science, but the ID theories he defends would close off inquiry with nonanswers.
Like the decision to call evolution Darwinism, the omission of science from Expelled was a deliberate choice. In fact, it was crucial to the film's strategy. Because they know Americans revere freedom of speech and fairness, the producers cast the conflict between evolution and ID as purely a struggle between worldviews -- a difference of opinions, a battle of ideologies--in which one side is censoring the other. They know that the public will instinctively want to defend the underdog, especially when that opinion aligns with the religious beliefs many of them already share. It is a terrific strategy, but with one caveat: that airy skirmish of opinions must never, ever touch the ground of solid evidence. Because if it does, if viewers are ever allowed to notice that evolution is supported by mountains of tangible, peer-reviewed evidence gathered by generations of scientists, whereas ID has little more than a smattering of vanity-press pamphlets from a handful of cranks... the bubble pops.
Thoughts
Cashune.com - Make quick cash today, fast and easy
Submitted on November 29th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://Cashune.com][img]http://demya.com/images/money_tree.jpg[/img][/url]
Hey Everybody
Check out [url=http://cashune.com][b]Cashune.com[/b][/url] - pay per view and per signup up to $7.50 per offer. Payment via paypal, fast and easy!
If your going to spend so much time online - at least make money while your at it [url=http://demya.com][img]http://demya.com/images/smile.gif[/img][/url]
Collagen Beauty - Anti Aging Face Cream with Collagen
Submitted on November 24th, 2008 by AnonymousHi Everybody
I just became a part of this online community here and I would like to be a part of it.
Just love the atmosphere here. Great job by the admin and mods and every member around.
I recognize the value of the classof videos and links provided by each personhere and hope I can do my own bit of contribution.
Just to start off, I came across this site [url=http://www.mycollagenbeauty.com][b]MyCollagenBeauty.com[/b][/url] that is offering a 10-minute Skin Regeneration Program created especially so that people that have responsive skin, acne skin troublescan fully usethe precious ingredients contained in Collagen Beauty Line products. Using the trouble-free rules of the Program, you can be confident that you will give your skin everything necessary for it to look more beautiful every day.
About 80% of your skin is made from collagen, giving the skin its major structure.
Collagen makes skin stronger, thicker and more elastic, which is what makes skin smooth, firm and strong - and young looking. But sadly as we age the skin losses collagen and your body slowly but surely produces less and less.
To optimize the effects of skin care using Collagen Beauty Line cosmetics, the 10-minute Skin Regeneration Program was created.
o Apply Collagen Beauty Exclusive to dry and cleansed face. Using your fingertips dab the gel gently into the skin.
o Wait 10 minutes until gel is completely absorbed and you will feel a slight skin tension.
o Apply a small amount of Collagen Beauty GLA Revive, Collagen Beauty Light or Collagen Beauty Marigold Cream and then gently spread it or dab it into the skin.
Hi all
Submitted on November 23rd, 2008 by Anonymouslook forward to be a part of it. Just love the atmosphere here. Good work by the admin and mods and every member around.
Just to kickstart, I would like to ask first if you're into those dressup doll games. Bec if you do, then imma have to ask you which one is better---Barbie or Bratz games?
[url=http://www.puredressup.com/category/15/1/][b]Barbie games[/b][/url] inspired a lot of other games. Bratz may deny it but the concept of many if not all Bratz games originated from Barbie. Take for example the many dress up games that Bratz fans are so addicted to right now. The ideas of these games all came from Barbie. Who invented changeable clothes, customizable accessories and colourful nail polishes and hair? Barbie did. Who incorporated real like perks like cars, hotels and hot cribs? Barbie did.
On the other hand, Bratz are so popular. There is no question about that. They are loved by kids and adults alike. This is the reason [url=http://www.puredressup.com/category/25/1/][b]Bratz games[/b][/url] are so popular. Whenever there is a new Bratz game, expect the millions of Bratz fans to play it. There is even a war going on between Bratz and Barbie fans. Who’s better? Who’ sexier? Who’s classier?
If you don't know how to trade, then let Zulutrade
Submitted on November 21st, 2008 by AnonymousI'm a totally a newbie in forex. But one thing for sure is I want to sign up with either marketiva or instaforex. I'm gonna love you forever if anyone of you can point me the better one. I won't mind signing up under your affiliate link. [url=http://www.fxgator.info] :)[/url]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img3.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img4.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img6.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img8.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img10.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.fxgator.info/img11.jpg[/img]
BetOT.com - Sports Betting, Horse Racing & Bookie Gambling Site
Submitted on November 21st, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://betot.com][img]http://demya.com/images/sports-gamble.jpg[/img][/url]
[b]Online Sportsbook - Horse Racing - Bookie Service [/b]
Betot.com is the premier online sportsbook, created just to meet your gaming entertainment needs. [url=http://betot.com][b]BetOT.com[/b][/url] is the ultimate destination for online sports betting, horse racing and online casino gaming.
Enjoy the finest in 24 hour sportsbook betting alternatives and online sports betting options, along with a quality offering of first-rate casino games. Here you will enjoy soccer betting, basketball betting , football betting , baseball betting, tennis, hockey, and many other world sports.
We provide additional services including a lucrative affiliate program, fast payouts, betting insurance, and more.
Come visit our website at [url=http://betot.com][b]Betot.com[/b][/url] and/or or call our bookie agents at [b]1-888-828-9497[/b] for the latest info on bets, services, banking and payouts. [url=http://34up.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
Demya Reveals Forum Post Method to Gaining Web Traffic
Submitted on November 20th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://demya.com][img]http://demya.com/images/promotion.gif[/img][/url]
[b]Promote Your Website, Product or Services on Forums Worldwide[/b]
We can post your promotional message on millions of forums worldwide. No, this isn't spam email. It's penetrating online established communities relative to your website, product or services. Not only does this increase SEO & Web Traffic, but by targeting forums relative to your online activity, you are able to increase potential sales.
The post will appear exactly like this post.
You define the TITLE, POST, & ANCHOR TEXT which can include url back links to your website.
[b]Watch Online Video Demonstration[/b]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wALJl6fZ5...
[b]Our Prices:[/b]
100,000 Unique Forum Posts: $75
400,000 Unique Forum Posts: $250
[url=http://34up.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url] Feel free to contact me directly via [b]ICQ: 162456288[/b] or [url=http://demya.com][b]Click Here[/b][/url] [url=http://www.demya.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
[u][b]Need an Example of Service? --> This post was published by automated means[/b]![/u]
ScrewCollege - Financial Freedom - Dominate eBay Today
Submitted on November 14th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://www.ScrewCollege.com][img]http://www.treehugger.com/us-money-photo.jpg[/img][/url]
Hey Everybody [url=http://www.24-7bookie.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
Let This Rich "College Dropout" show you how to make double or triple what you make now.
My Course Will Teach You Step By Step How To Make $10,000 or More Per Month Giving Away Free Gifts Online & How To Make At Least $70,000 Per Year Selling The Hottest Items On Ebay . . .
The Blueprint For A Grand Total of $190,000+ Per Year Is At Your Fingertips Today!
[url=http://screwcollege.com/ ][b]ScrewCollege.com[/b][/url]
RentalValuator.net - Investor & Real Estate Agent Software
Submitted on November 14th, 2008 by Anonymous[b]INVESTORS:[/b] Stop losing money on your projects. Stop buying the wrong properties. Stop overpaying. Our professinal software allows you to [b]evaluate your rental investments in minutes.[/b] Cap Rate Analysis based on unlimited number of units, Sensitivity Analysis, Discount Cashflow Analysis - all explained in detail and at your fingertips in seconds.
Anyone can use this software to make more money in Real Estate - no matter what skill level investor or computer user you are!
[b]AGENTS:[/b] Start speaking the same language as your clients. Next time you are asked about the Cap Rate, Cash - on - Cash Return, Payback Period, or projected IRR of the property, have the answer in seconds!
Use our software to create professioanal-looking reports as supplements to your standard listing sheets.
[b]We offer the following:[/b] [url=http://www.RentalValuator.net][b]www.RentalValuator.net[/b][/url]
1) Free 30-minute phone walk-through of the software when you download
2) Great Customer Support as long as you use the software
3) Free 30-Day Trial - Try our fully featured software at no risk!
TouchPro.it - Article Writing & Promotion
Submitted on November 14th, 2008 by AnonymousHi Everybody [url=http://www.demya.com][img]http://demya.com/images/smile.gif[/img][/url]
Is there any website that you guys can suggest that can assist on doing research?
I'm a university student who's sorta fed up with trying to extract from Google answers to a lot of questions relative to research Im doing.
I found a cool site that includes a lot of well written articles on a variety of subjects called [url=http://TouchPro.it]TouchPro.it[/url].
Any other suggestions?
Are these guys for real? Can they do that?
Submitted on November 10th, 2008 by AnonymousHi Everybody [url=http://www.betvegasvic.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
Kudos to the mods and members. I've spent a couple of days on and off lurking the forum and really enjoy reading the posts.
Saw this vid on youtube, Swiss came up with a new drug that removes the smell of booze? Whats going on? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CXDU6H7W...
BestBathStore.com - Dead Sea Products, Gifts, Baths & Soap
Submitted on November 10th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://www.bestbathstore.com][img]http://www.bestbathstore.com/images/bbs_logo.gif[/img][/url]
Hello Everybody... [url=http://www.earthiscalling.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
Here's a little something off topic.
What is a better gift for my wife...
She loves hot baths so I was thinking maybe a fragrant [url=http://www.bestbathstore.com]bath & soap[/url] gift set with some chocalate and wine.
Any ideas... ???
Best-Juicing - Amazing Simple Weight Loss Program
Submitted on November 9th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://www.best-juicing.com][img]http://www.best-juicing.com/logo23.gif[/img][/url]
Hi Everybody... [url=http://www.earthiscalling.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
I'm now working on a [url=http://www.Best-Juicing.com]weight loss[/url] program that seems to be pretty good.
Was wondering if anybody here also is on a diet and what your methods are?
Hello there,anyone here want to increase website business
Submitted on November 9th, 2008 by AnonymousNoobie here [url=http://24-7bookie.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
I found this site on a website which helps you increase PR; that site was [url=http://www.mywebsiteneedstraffic.com]MyWebsiteNeedsTraffic.com[/url]
Supposedly that site i a search engine optimization site and allows users to rent out parts of it in order to advertise their own site and the owner of this website probably took the offer since I came across this site from that one. Has anyone else except the owner of this website used that traffic purchasing web site before and are they any good? I’m considering using their trial but wanted to get more feedback before trying their service out.
This is about me: I love to play football, favorite The Shing.
Well I guess I’m finished taking up your time. Definitely look forward to being introduced.
AgentsBuddy.com - Need Advice for First Time Homebuyer?
Submitted on November 9th, 2008 by AnonymousGreetings...
I just wanted to say hello to everyone. I have been a long time lurker of this forum and decided to join. There are a lot of interesting posts here and the members and the MOD's are pretty friendly.
I would like some advice from maybe some of the senior members about home buying. Me and the wifey are thinking about buying a home. I have been reading a little bit about foreclosures and getting some homebuying tips from this [url=http://agentsbuddy.com]Real Estate[/url] site but we are still undecided.
I think this site is more for Real Estate Agents just trying to promote themselves for free.
Comments appreciated from any member.
WeightChoice.com - Healthy Instructions to Losing Weight
Submitted on November 7th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://www.weightchoice.com][img]http://www.weightchoice.com/images/logo2.gif[/img][/url]
Hi Everybody... [url=http://afterworkcasino.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
I'm now involved with a [url=http://www.weightchoice.com]weight loss[/url] program thats aimed at trimming my body.
I used to be a cheer leader in high school thus I've always dreaded the thought of growing obese to the point of no return. So basically, Im now using the principles I found at [url=http://weightchoice.com]WeightChoice.com[/url].
I'm interested to know if anybody else is working on a diet - and what their methods are?
Feel free to PM me your answers Feel [url=http://www.www.bestbathstore.com][img]http://demya.com/images/smile.gif[/img][/url]
PeaceMovers.com - Locating Local Moving Company
Submitted on November 7th, 2008 by Anonymous[url=http://peacemovers.com][img]http://demya.com/images/movers_and_a_truck.gif[/img][/url]
Hey Everybody... [url=http://demya.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
First, kudos to the mods on a excellent job here on the forum. I've spent the last 2 weeks lurking the forum as a guest, and this place rocks!
Anyway, I've just moved from Jersey to New York. So here I am kicking it in the big apple waiting for Santa and his pals to show up.
I found a post here on the forums about [url=http://Peacemovers.com]Peacemovers.com[/url] so originally I came back only to thank you guys for the recommendation. Really great moving service.
These moving guys did about 80% of the packing and provided temporary storage because the new apartment wasnt ready on time.
Btw - Anybody here from NY? Feel free to PM me with some tips on where to hang out...
BetVegasVic.com - Online Casino & Gambling Sports Bookie Service
Submitted on October 28th, 2008 by AnonymousHi Everybody [url=http://24-7bookie.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
I've been here as a guest on the forum for a while reading different threads. This seems like a really cool place to hang out on - kudos to the mods! Anyway, I have a non-related noob question that I hope doesn't get me kicked off the board for asking
I recently have been doing some betting online via [url=http://24-7bookie.com][b]24-7Bookie.com[/b][/url]
Truthfully, you win some and lose some. So far I'm on top generating some good side cash to enjoy myself so that really isnt what this thread is about.
Does anybody know how to tilt the odds of gambling online in my favor? Are there any software programs that can increase my chances? Or maybe some docs that makes internet betting more profitable?
Thanks for any help... [url=http://betvegasvic.com][img]http://demya.com/images/forums.gif[/img][/url]
what's in it for you?
Submitted on April 25th, 2008 by rom12921So, the answer to my question is its cultural and philosophical significance that interests you.
Your series of leading questions isn't worth refuting (fallacy of many questions).
"Why four gospels that disagree?" Responding, accepts the(untrue)premise of your question. Examples, "Do you still take anti-psychotic medication?", "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
While I appreciate you answering my question, you don't need to do anything for me as I haven't requested it. Also, no reason to patronize as I assure you I am well-read and educated.
i didn't say i didn't
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by wishnevskyi didn't say i didn't believe it was credible. I said it was full of atrocities and some decent poetry. It is one of the few histories we have from so long ago, and although flawed, is valuable.
I don't believe it is infallible, or that it is the pure word of god. It is the holy book of a nation, the Jews, and is one of the foundation books of our culture. I could no more ignore the bible than i could ignore Shakespeare or Jefferson.
But i don't have to believe that Jefferson or Shakespeare are divinely inspired to read them either.
That said, the bible is internally inconsistent. Why four gospels that disagree? Why the evolution of god? Why the addendum of Paul and St. John? Why Revelations, for crying out loud?
There is a lot of research and scholarly work on these an other questions, which i find amusing, and a great way to drive off literalists.
A copy of the Gospel of Thomas will drive off any number of Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses and other fanatics who want me to worship their god.
I believe that Jesus was a great philosopher, whose words have been perverted more than any other's in all of history.
But I'm not going to do your research for you. Look up the Gospel of Q, and see for yourself. Or not. It means nothing to me, one way or the other.
These are not secrets, all serious students of the bible know them, it's just the fundamentalists who studiously ignore all this work.
Gen 3:16
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by rom12921Why quote from the Bible if you don't believe it credible? Why are you interested? What is in it for you?
Far be it from me to disturb
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by wishnevskyFar be it from me to disturb your ignorance. Perhaps the "corners of the earth" was apocryphal, there was a story that a pope denied Columbus's theory that the world was round, because Jesus had sent his apostles to the corners of the earth. However there is this;
Genesis 3:16 To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth. In pain you will bring forth children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."
This verse has been used for centuries to oppress women, and more to my point, was used by the Catholic Church to oppose use of anesthesia in childbirth, because women were supposed to suffer.
Just from a quick concordance scan, of the 172 uses of the word "pain" in the bible, only two mentions the NT refer to childbirth, whereas, the farther back you go in the OT, the more the word pain refers to childbirth.
Again we see the concept of God evolving over time.
But remain in bliss, for all of me.
Happy to be close minded
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by chief28.retI have already admitted to being blissfully ignorant because of my belief in God, and because of my close mindedness, I would also refute your assertion that:
"Religion has been wrong on the "corners of the Earth", wrong on "in pain shall you bear them," wrong on slavery, wrong on the submission of women, wrong on so many things that were actually none of their business, that it is hard to credit their opinion on anything."
My (albeit) limited research, study, and information would portray a much different story of the [imagined?] historical accounts you try to persuade with. But because you are so open minded and obviously enlightened, I doubt you would consider my point of view.
Therefore, I will say a silent prayer for you, and remain, blissfully ignorant.
thanks Wish, I see your blog
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by John 2000thx
wish, please post a link if you can ...
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by John 2000I think others here would be interested.
regards
Ironic
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by rom12921How wrong you are on religion being wrong.
Signed,
Open-minded religious person that disagrees with your assumptions.
Why do you think i owe you a
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by wishnevskyWhy do you think i owe you a free science lesson? What is your basis for entitlement on this matter?
I am a paid writer, not a well paid writer, but nevertheless. If i write what i want, i do that for fun. If i write what you want, i expect to get paid.
However, out of the goodness of my heart, i will post an old essay on god and the big bang on my blog.
I doubt you will be happy with my posting. My sympathies.
Wish ...
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by John 2000In your own words, please explain to me the Big Bang.
Religion has been wrong on
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by wishnevskyReligion has been wrong on the "corners of the Earth", wrong on "in pain shall you bear them," wrong on slavery, wrong on the submission of women, wrong on so many things that were actually none of their business, that it is hard to credit their opinion on anything.
This (one sided) controversy is a perfect example. Evolution is not required to discredit Genesis, geology, oceanography, astronomy, genetics, anthropology, paleontology and dozens of more sciences have hard evidence that the world is orders of magnitude older than Genesis proscribes.
It's just easier to argue with the "descended from apes" meme than to argue with stratiography that clearly shows hundreds of thousands of annually deposited layers.
They have records of tree rings older than the Bible, not that that will convince any close minded religious person.
Cornelius
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by rom12921No inquiry is allowed. The (Darwinian) council has spoken.
Sincerely,
Dr Zaius
** no self-respecting ape is religious **
Submitted on April 23rd, 2008 by bipolar2The falsity of 'intelligent design' is proved by the existence of those who believe in it.
bipolar2
Fear not those ...
Submitted on April 22nd, 2008 by John 2000bitter bumpkins of evolutionary monopoly clinging to their stagnant Darwinian Bibles, their little flashlights. They have a fear of strange and foreign inquiry and of those who see things differently. I cannot blame them. They are afraid; afraid to even try to see beyond their own crystallized certainties.
"every inquiry into medicine
Submitted on April 22nd, 2008 by rom12921"every inquiry into medicine from autopsy to anesthesia to birth control to in vitro fertilization to blood transfusion to surgery itself"
Good example of "orthodox irrationality". Amusing Indeed
An i amused that science is
Submitted on April 22nd, 2008 by wishnevskyAm i amused that science is self correcting and is a process of discovery? Am i amused that religion is a process of denying and obscuring obvious truth in favor of orthodox irrationality?
Sure, but then i am easily amused. I am especially amused that religion has fought against every inquiry into medicine from autopsy to anesthesia to birth control to in vitro fertilization to blood transfusion to surgery itself?
Ha ha. I am doubled up with hilarity.
Ho Ho.
How amusing.
I agree
Submitted on April 22nd, 2008 by rom12921If people have been indoctrinated to accept a particular world-view; probably not much that will change it.
However, I object to the mocking "amused" and the "open-minded" commentary. Just because a person comes to a different conclusion from reviewing evidence, doesn't mean they are close-minded.
Maybe you'll find this amusing....
In the 70's, public schools taught the Earth was 500 million years old. By the mid 80's-2 billion; now 4.6 billion. In 30 years, the earth is 4.1 billion years older.
As i said below, it is a
Submitted on April 22nd, 2008 by wishnevskyAs i said below, it is a waste of time arguing with people who receive their information by revelation, but there have been two items of irony that have always amused me.
In Middle Tennessee, one can observe preachers fulminating against Evolution in churches made of Oldovian Limestone, which is composed of fossil sea creatures, easily visible to the naked eye.
Any open-minded reading of the Christian Bible clearly discloses a God who has Himself evolved, from the bloody-handed and punitive Old Testament JWH to the loving and gentle Jesus, who in turn evolves into the Authoritarian warrior of Paul and St. John.
Most amusing to see the Hebrew God evolve from a tribal deity to a Buddhist pacifist to a Roman Emperor on steroids.
But as i say, a waste of time to argue such matters.
If any open-minded person reads this, permit me to recommend "The Gospel of Thomas" a Gnostic text, easily available on line or in libraries.
Belief, in science and in God
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by JoelFortuitously, Pew's website brings us an interview with Francis Collins, a scientist who believes in evolution and in God. It's worth reading the whole thing, but here's a nice excerpt:
Here's the URL:
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/805/the-evid...
wishful thinking ...
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by John 2000when you responded the other day with your puzzling ending statement that was:
"That is my opinion, clearly expressed, and is worth what your opinion is. Nothing."
You very effectively admitted therein that your opinion was worth nothing.
I would have inferred from that that you would have vaporized by now.
Thanks
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by rom12921"WWII was largely between the Atheistic religions of Fascism and Marxism" Yes, I have read that before. My thoughts on the causation of armed conflict come from John Keegan -The History of Warfare. You may find it helpful. I am not arguing from authority, just citing a source.
Why imply the Old Testament is "too much" for me? Plagues, mutilation, genocide and religious disagreements are not unique or new phenomenon. In fact, your "Read the Old T..." paragraph looks similar (names changed) to some contemporary headlines I've read.
Read what i said. WWII was
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by wishnevskyRead what i said. WWII was largely between the Atheistic religions of Fascism and Marxism. Most if not all tribes are defined by their tribal gods, or their tribal interpretations of a larger religion.
For example, female genital excision and honor killings of raped females are not sanctioned in the Koran, but various tribes project these customs into the corpus of Sharia law.
It is true that not all wars are religious, i never said that, but i will say that few nations can resist incorporating religion as a sanction for whatever wars they find themselves in. Even Stalin was forced to release some Orthodox priests from Siberia to boost morale in the Red Army.
Read the Old Testament. It reeks of blood, from circumcision to stoning to the Plagues of Egypt to the genocide practiced on the original inhabitants of Canaan to the wars of the Zealots.
Or if that is too much for you, read Mark Twain's "Letters From Earth" for an early and witty deconstruction of "Holy Writ."
Joel
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by rom12921Didn't say it was wrong. "Joel" attempts to contrast evolution and ID by implying evolutionary interpretation of evidence superior (intellectual snobbery?) The name-calling appears accurate and perhaps not as entertaining as I thought.
"You don't offer us any reasons to disbelieve evolutionary theory...." Not trying to pursuade with my comments. Please see author Jason Lisle, PhD astrophysicist if you would like some persuading.
Re: Intellectual snobbery
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by JoelCalling something "intellectual snobbery" or "secular humanism" does not, ipso facto, make it wrong.
You're correct that "consensus is not truth" in and of itself. But neither is dissent from consensus. Since most of us aren't scientists, we rely on consensus to provide us with a clue to the truth of things that we would otherwise need postgraduate science studies to understand.
You don't offer us any reasons to disbelieve evolutionary theory, or to persuade us that the scientific consensus is misguided. You offer some namecalling. And that is also not, in and of itself, truth.
wishnevsky
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by rom12921Your post regarding atrocities is incorrect. Atrocities have been committed by people regardless of religious background (WWII, tribal,etc). You are making a false causation assumption; and however careful, still an error in reasoning.
Sullivan/Joel -intellectual snobbery
Submitted on April 21st, 2008 by rom12921"evolution is supported by mountains of tangible, peer-reviewed evidence..." Stein's movie is about freedom to interpret evidence and make up your own mind. The same evidence can support a different conclusion.
"...generations of scientists" This is an example of the bandwagon fallacy. Many believe evolution to be true, it must be true. Consensus is not truth.
Mr sullivan. Your faith in your own reason is called Secular Humanism. It supports a naturalistic/atheistic explanation for all that is (Kurtz.Dawkins). All you are saying in your piece is my religion is better than yours.
so be it
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by John 2000[]
It is my carefully
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by wishnevskyIt is my carefully considered opinion that religion is the most dangerous force on this planet. Fine upstanding people consider it their duty to do horrible things to other fine people in the name of religion. I could list atrocities, crimes and massacres for the rest of the day and never come close to completing the roster of death and destruction caused by people trying to "save people's souls" by killing their bodies.
And before somebody says "the Nazis and the Communists were worse" i will state that it is my carefully considered opinion that Fascism and Marxism were Christian Heresies.
I don't care to argue. That is my opinion, clearly expressed, and is worth what your opinion is. Nothing.
Actually, Colbert proclaims ...
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by John 2000say wishnevsky you probably are a good chap and I don't wish to chop logic with you either.
Really all I wish to point out is that you 'come across' as arrogantly bigoted and emotionally invested in this issue. I have a hard time understanding why. I am not a religious person either.
No need to feel compelled to reply.
I do not proclaim, the pope
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by wishnevskyI do not proclaim, the pope does that, i state my opinion. Many people, the majority of people on Earth, do not recognize the sacredness of the bible or any book.
Please to not put words in my mouth, or set me up as a straw man for your vendettas against reason.
I'm not here to chop logic with anybody, i merely state that it is useless to argue with religious persons, as they are immune to reason and logic. Indeed they boast that faith supercedes logic, science and reason. Fine. No need of us wasting each other's time. My religion is a private matter, i wish other people would keep theirs private too.
But i know they won't, because god talks to them.
... and he who has reason
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by John 2000let him reason it for himself.
If, as you proclaim for us, the bible is such a 'vast agglomeration of falsehood, atrocity, ...', then it would be recognized as such, and your fears would fall by the wayside.
I have read it three times
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by wishnevskyI have read it three times in toto, and several more times in part. I have studied scholarly historical books on the bible, and find that it is a vast agglomeration of falsehood, atrocity and some decent poetry.
How ever the worst thing about the bible is the people who claim to have read it, but have not comprehended.
He who has ears, let him hear.
Still proud to be ignorant
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by chief28.retAfter reading many of the blogs below, I still have not seen any reason not to be proud of my "obvious" ignorance. But as George Michael says "ya gotta have Faith" ...
Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen.
And oh, by the way, wishnevsky, you said "Many Americans would prefer such a state, where the answers to all questions are found in a single book, interpreted by a single person."
Let's call this what it is. The Bible is actually a collection of 66 books (39 old testament, 27 New testament). It was written by over 40 authors over 1600+ years with differing backgrounds (Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic) yet with unmistakable continuity and agreement. It is the single most published book in the world, translated into virtually every language, and has survived bans, burnings, ridicule, criticism, scrutiny, examination, and attack.
And yet, It is inerrant in it's original manuscript, infallible in it's account, trustworthy and God inspired (literally God Breathed ((2 Tim 3:16))yet recorded by individuals with different personalities, writing abilities, experiences, and areas of passion).
Perhaps you should read it, because when you do, it will probably read you.
This is why I am apparently ignorant, because I believe what this "book" says!!! "In the beginning, GOD created..."
re: Science is science
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by John 2000... and science by its very construct is meant to evolve and is hopefully intelligent. Science is a probing tool. It cannot lay claim to being the sole proprietor of the natural world, and somehow marginalize all other spheres into a biased space by labels such as 'super'natural.
Yes, science is science. Science is a quest for truth and knowledge. Today, previously accepted scientific fact is discarded as fast as new scientific facts are proposed.
I, unlike yourself apparently, do not consider this to be a political or a religious issue. I see it as a question held hostage by politics.
I consider that ID does have a legitimate place in in any liberal (in the old sense) education in the spheres of philosophy, critical thinking, and debate. I think that science should welcome such tangential processes as being sources of enrichment and perspective. I feel very strongly that it should not be excluded from curricula as venues of choice.
Have you ever read de Chardin? I have not since a long time ago, but I recall him discussing such topics rather intelligently.
Re: Intelligent design has nothing to do with religion
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by JoelI suppose technically that's true. But in reality, it's false, and everybody knows it. ID was just what creationists came up with when they realized there was no way to keep creationism in the schools.
ID didn't evolve as any kind of scientific theory, in other words: It evolved (heh) as a political solution to a political problem. It's creationism in disguise, but with a disingenuous caveat -- It might not've been God! It might've been magical aliens! -- to pretend it's not religious.
Personally, I believe it's possible to believe in God and evolution. Richard Dawkins is a bit of an ass, yes, and because of that he gets the most attention. But there are many, many scientists who feel the way I do. Why?
Because science and religion involve two different realms. Science describes the natural world; religion describes the supernatural world. Where scientists have a problem with pushing ID is that it really does try to finagle a supernatural discussion into an area it doesn't belong. Let science be science.
The Aids and Influenza
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by wishnevskyThe Aids and Influenza viruses evolve so fast they are proving to change faster than humans can create new defenses against them. I sometimes think people who hate and deny science should refuse modern medicine as a matter of principle. That would nicely demonstrate evolution. But it is futile. An honest man can not win a argument against a person who ignores the evidence of their senses, in favor of some ideal conception of the universe.
It's a hopeless task, no need to bother.
Pepper Moths, in our lifetime, have evolved
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by AnonymousThe Pepper Moth, which had always been a white moth, has evolved to know be a brownish-grey moth which can better blend in with an urban landscape and is now better able to survive. There are many other examples of very visible examples of evolution happening today.
As for there being no transitional fossil record, it is an outright lie. We have, literally, trillions of fossils which chart the progression of animals from one kind of thing to another. If you someone has told that we don't, you have been lied to.
As for carbon dating, no, it is not a perfectly accurate dating system, but for the time spans which are involved in evolutionary science, it is perfectly acceptable. To say that it has been "widely discredited," is, again, an outright lie.
alas
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by John 2000those who want evidence cannot see the forest for the trees.
also: the concept of intelligent design has nothing to do with religion per se.
what if god was a scientist and evolution was found to be part of a design?
would this threaten you?
The idea that there is
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by wishnevskyThe idea that there is reason, truth and meaning to the exterior world is attractive, but is most likely a function of our own brains.
For example, it is fairly obvious that the bicameral human brain has led to the erroneous perception that the forces of nature are arranged in pairs of opposing opposites; good and bad, black and white, up and down, right and left. A little thought will show that there is no such thing as pure white or pure black in the universe. Even the surface of a star is not purely composed of radiance in all spectra, and even the center of the earth, or the depth of space are purely devoid of any radiation.
Similarly, in human events, no person is true good, or purely evil. Hitler loved dogs, Mother Teresa had her moments of doubt.
However,it is futile to try to explain the structure of reality to a person who does not want to see it, who wants simple, pure black and white answers to very complex questions. In fact, the concepts of "questions" and "answers" are human constructs, that may or may not have any relation to what we perceive as reality.
Sci9entists know that our perception imposes a definition of reality, that is very limited in range and spectrum of perception.
That is fine, science is a process, not a dogma, and the object is to constantly improve one's perception.
Most people do not want to bother with reality. They want all the answers now, right now, in one place, in simple language. If they don't have it, they will invent it.
Fine as far as it goes, but in the majority of the world, people untrammeled by the restraints of Christian tradition, are making huge progress in the biological sciences, putting America farther and farther behind, and in danger of becoming a futile theocratic state.
Many Americans would prefer such a state, where the answers to all questions are found in a single book, interpreted by a single person.
I wish them the joy of this desire and will fight the implementation of this program by any means necessary.
The idea that people who
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by ansuyoThe idea that people who believe God created the world are blind fools who refuse to see the facts is not true. I am an intelligent human being, and I see all kinds of evidence that people and all creation are not "random" at all. Don't write us off as people who just say "God did it" and have no other basis for our reasoning. Our reasoning begins with God, yours begins with evolution. I read stuff by people I disagree with (evo. scientists) Do you read things by creationists or ID people?
In a bigger forum, we could debate this with facts, but I have neither the space nor the time to debate the facts which will change neither of our minds.
The fossil record does not show a change from one kind of thing to another. It shows adaptation only. The problem is that regardless of your view, both start with the premise and then interpret evidence to support it. I have seen evolutionists and creationists and ID people do this over and over again.
I'm sorry to tell you Macro-evolution is based on fallacies, but it's true. I don't for a second believe you will believe that however, so we will have to agree to disagree.
Even carbon dating has been widely discredited and yet they continue using it and dating things by a flawed system.
Once again - show me one time when something changed from one kind to another. Didn't happen.
Try visiting the creation museum if you want some good evidence. Otherwise, time will tell which is right and I'd rather believe like I do and be wrong than believe like you do and be wrong.
Good Film
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by AnonymousI enjoyed the documentary and it is clear that there really are two distinct world views and that Stein is correct - the "scientific" point of view has totally bought into the atheist, evolutionist position. The result is a culture of death that has lost the integrity of scientific inquiry and embraced the kool-aid of abortion and eugenics. Cheers to Stein for having the courage to call them on it!
Where is your evidence?
Submitted on April 20th, 2008 by AnonymousPeople are quick to decry scientists and intellectuals as "close-minded" because they refuse to acknowledge those who support the theory of Intelligent Design. For those of you who support that theory, where is your evidence to support your position?
Those who believe in evolution have fossil records, DNA evidence, the logicality of random mutation and survival of the fittest, and many other points of evidence to support their claims, but where are yours?
The idea that "Because God did it," is an acceptable answer to any question completely negates the need for evidence. When I was in school, taking a math test, the teacher always required us to show our work so that we could prove that we had a reason for getting our answer. Would anyone accept that 2 + 2 = 5 because God said so? Of course not.
Science is not a matter of developing a theory based on what you believe to be true, it is based on fact. IDists would have us all create a theory and ignore any evidence that contradicts us.
Perhaps I could come up with a theory that we are all simply entities in a computer, like The Matrix, and wouldn't my "theory" be as valid as yours?
I agree
Submitted on April 19th, 2008 by ansuyoI too am happy to be ignorant as defined by those who would cut off all opinion but their own by casting doubt about their intelligence.
Write what you love and get paid at:
Helium.com Home Page
Proud to be ignorant
Submitted on April 19th, 2008 by chief28.retI want to address one of the questions above:
"Or are Ben Stein and his allies trying to sneak religion into the schools?"
Why is the intellectual left so afraid of religion in school? I had a discussion in my office last week where I decried the liberal academic professors at our universities as abusing their positions by preaching intolerance of conservative views to our kids.
My coworker countered that they are merely trying to get the kids to think differently and be aware of differing points of view. To question ingrained beliefs and social mores.
The fact is, we need religion in our schools now more than ever! And No, I am not saying only Christian religions, I mean religions of all kinds and faiths. Perhaps then we can get to the point where students can honestly and openly begin to understand different religions and points of view.
Most of our conflicts in the world today are religion-based and maybe, just maybe, understanding and open discussion of different faiths can be a good thing. but instead, the liberal academics want only their view expressed and none other.
Why sneak religion into schools...I want to openly and honestly promote religion in schools...but the academic mafia in this country would cry and babble incoherently and complain that we ignorant peons simply can't understand.
I'm proud to be ignorant if it means that I believe in Yes, I'll say it, God! He is the creator, the way, the truth, and the life.
zero sum game
Submitted on April 19th, 2008 by John 2000I am convinced by now that the net sum and effect of all of the intelligence resident on this planet approaches zero.
That said, let's argue about whether this sum is an intentional result of some intelligent design or a random result of chaotic mechanics -- a sort of zero sum game played on a zero sum planet with zero sum results.
Proponents are what they are. They are like electrons and protons.
The atom contains both. I would say that the truth is vast enough to be composed of intelligent design and evolution.
Oh, how we quibble.
Which side has the closed minds?
Submitted on April 19th, 2008 by ansuyoI find it so amazing that "Scientists" have closed off the possiblility of God yet yell at the other side for having closed minds. If there is overwhelming evidence, I'd love to see it because I've not seen it so far. Those who promote micro evolution (not macro or adapting)have become an ilitist group that holds themselves as smarter than anyone who would dare believe anything else. Joel's favorite shows that. So, if you're so smart: show me the money. I'm not ignorant about this subject at all before you assume otherwise, and I'll tell you when I will believe I "evolved" from a monkey -- when you show me something, anything with conclusive proof that it changed from one KIND to another KIND. Things adapt to their environment, causing changes in species within a kind, but they are always what they started out to be. A moth may change color, but it is still a moth. ... Ever learning but never coming to the knowledge of truth... Don't sputter and spit and put the other side down as anti-intellectual -- put your money where your mouth is and prove it.
Write about what you love and get paid at:
Helium.com Home Page