Spc. Monica Brown, silver star winner
The Associated Press

Specialist Monica Brown, a U.S. Army medic, received a Silver Star for valor in March. Brown is the second female since World War II to earn the medal for her gallant actions while in combat in Iraq.

Featured Topic | Posted 14 weeks 1 day ago

Should women be exposed to combat?

Women in the U.S. military are now a fact of life. American servicewomen are flying jets and helicopter gunships, driving and fixing trucks, searching suspected terrorists, patching the wounded and, in some cases, killing the enemy up close. Is that a good thing?

As the nation's warriors enter their sixth year in the Iraq war, more women are on the battleground than at any time in U.S. history. They now make up between 10 and 15 percent of the forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. "Reality is, we can't fill (forward support companies) without females," one Iraq veteran told the Defense Department for a recent report on the assignment of women. Another said flatly that American forces "can't accomplish the mission without women."

But the debate continues about whether women should serve an even greater role by joining men in ground combat units. Are women strong enough, mentally and physically? Will they kill when they have to? Can men and women work together at the grueling pace of combat operations? Is integrating women into combat a sign of progress or a mistake?

Read More

Ben likes: Women at war

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos/ American Conservative

Men and women home from the war acknowledge that there are many questions from the old co-ed combat debate still unresolved, despite years of experimentation.

Shock integration happened when the administration decided to wage a war in Iraq on top of an increasingly complex operation in Afghanistan. And now women in unprecedented combat roles have become essential to sustaining force strength overseas. This situation, and all its unacceptable consequences, will only get worse as long as the Bush administration refuses to initiate troop reductions and limit deployments. The candidates contending to replace Bush, meanwhile, offer little prospect of saner policies: the Democratic candidates have been silent on the realities of co-ed combat, while the Republican nominee insists that we may be in Iraq for another century.

America never consciously chose to send women into combat, but they are there now and in some cases are paying a tragic price.  

Read More

Joel likes: In defense of women in combat

Rosa Brooks/Los Angeles Times

"Women aren't big and strong enough for combat." I'll buy this when someone explains why the Marine Corps will cheerfully accept a 4-foot-10 male recruit who weighs 96 pounds.

Sure, the Marines will make a man out of him, but even if they water the guy with Miracle-Gro, they won't be able to turn him into a 6-footer. The average man may be bigger and stronger than the average woman, but plenty of women are bigger and stronger than many men. Why discriminate based on gender when you could have straightforward, task-specific strength requirements?

Locking women out of combat positions may help a few American men maintain the illusion of gallantry, but it's time to acknowledge reality. Women will die alongside men in any terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and women, like men, are affected by our national defense policies. It's time to give them the right to fight for their country. 

Read More

Where do you stand on this issue?

Click on the graph to cast your vote.
average
vote
your vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google