This week John McCain and Hillary Clinton both used the housing-market upheaval to offer a window on what their presidencies would look like. The contrast in philosophy and program is something voters should pay attention to.
Mrs. Clinton proposes a curious triumvirate of grey eminences -- Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin -- to sit down and in three weeks come up with a more comprehensive rescue plan. Yes, this is the same Mr. Rubin who, as chairman of Citigroup's executive committee, oversaw the bank's reckless plunge into mortgage risk. And it is the same Mr. Greenspan who opened the liquidity floodgates as Fed Chairman and so helped to inflate the credit bubble. She got it right in choosing Mr. Volcker, but he's endorsed Mr. Obama.
Mr. McCain can be a little too righteous when he claims he would "not play election-year politics with the housing crisis." What he does seem to understand, however, is that most Americans are responsible borrowers who don't want to underwrite the losses of those who aren't. In that, he is politically smarter than Senators Clinton and Obama.
Thoughts