redblueamerica.com

That's the kind of president I want!!!!!!!!!! NOT

Mrs. Clinton's political election tactics seem familiar. The old adage that you try to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative seems to be Bill and Hillary’s theme song. It used to be that if a politician got caught telling a lie their career was over, but know the Clintons both have caught telling whoppers and I don’t mean hamburgers. Bill as you remember fell in heat with one of their female aides and will always be remembered saying “I didn’t have sex with Monica, as a result Bill and Hilary were both asked to leave the White House. Now Hillary seems to have experienced memory lapses or opportunities to embellish her past military experiences and paint herself as having gone through combat experiences, worthy of combat decorations. But as we have found out later, it was just a mistake as would be electing Hillary and getting Bill in the bargain.

Bluntly stated, Richardson just lost all respect that Democrats once felt for him (enormous). Why, did he do it? Must be a sell out for the Vice Presidency or a secret resentment of the Clintons. Either way, he has now become a non entity in the Democratic Party. Hopefully Gore and Edwards don't play into the same self serving behavior. If they do, they will hurt my heart as a Democrat. Richardson did that. I am saying this because I hope to WAKE up the hardened Party leaders to the real passion that most Democrats have for their leaders. Non-entity casulties so far: Oprah (betrayed all the women she professed to stand for), Ted Kennedy, Kerry, and now Richarson (did he lie when running against Barack or now caved in).

DON'T LET THEM FORCE YOU OUT. HANG IN THERE. THE TURNCOATS CANNOT DECIDE THIS ELECTION FOR YOU.

you are right about that..but even more important maybe this is a lesson for us.. maybe in order to save a lot of time and money and stress.. we could scrutinize candidates before they run.. get rid of the skeletons early and know if it really is a candidate that we want to run.. kinda late now to find out that someone isnt even suitable to be running ..We need to have reputable and responsible ..honorable people to be our president.. not those that would serve their own purposes.

American look at what you are voting for. Is it more important to put Obama in the white house or more important to have a leader. Look around your communities and see how the men and women you respect behave. I can assure you that not one of them would sit their children down in a church that taught them to hate another race. America go to your childrens collage's and see what is going on. It is not the man that is getting these young people out it is his campaign workers filling your childrens heads with the vision that is nothing more than a very bad dream.

I will not belong to a party that puts Obama in the race for the white house. It has nothing to do with his race. It is the person that has shown me he is not worthy to be our President. I love my country and the people of America and there is no way that I can vote for Obama.

If the democratic party does not wake up then I will not be a part of the disaster they will bring to this country if they insist on Obama running for president.

I also believe Hillary is still running because she knows Obama is not the person to be President.

The media is not doing their job or else it would not have taken so long to bring the story about Obama's church to the attention of the American pulic nor would they listen to a 5000 word speech to pull the wool over your eyes and discuss what a great speech it is. Instead they would say what a great job of a cover up.

I did not say what color Jesus was.. or that I assumed he was.. I said that they determined of their own volition that because we are white and they think our God is white..they wanted to have a black God.. so they made Jesus black.. this is their doctrine..God loves blacks, God hates whites, blacks hate whites and need to destroy them by whatever means.. I personally don't know and don't care what color Jesus was tho if we believe the scriptures and he was born of Jewish descent then he would be white.. but I dont make any claims one way or the other.. I just know that this religious group are racists and that is the group that Obama and Wright belong to.

I am a Christian and I am Black. All christians don't agree with what is solely conservative. Progress will occur but it will not be determined by any one politician and it will not be determined by the self serving republican party. You appear to delude youself into believing that any of these people will be your savior. Obama will be nominated if he continues to get more votes, not because of the media. I think youre judging based on your fear of lack of control. Join the club, thats life. Maybe you need to prey, sorry .pray more.

From “Sitting on the Fence” To Jumping on OBama’s “Bandwagon”

Does Governor Bill Richardson passionately believe that his late endorsement decisively bring an end to the process of the democratic nomination in favor of Barack Obama? Does Richardson think that Obama will choose him as his running mate if nominated? Does Obama-Richardson ticket help the Democratic Party to win the presidency next November if this happens? Alternatively, is Governor Richardson aspiring for a position in his perception that Obama will be the winner? Can he significantly influence the Latinos vote in favor of Obama? Whatever motive he may have in mind, he has clearly demonstrated that his endorsement is purely for political expediency or political opportunism. The practice of abandoning in reality some important political principles that were previously held, in the process of trying to increase one's political power and influence amounts to political expediency. The Governor’s staged action and his response to the press interview are a clear manifestation of political motivation designed to undermine the political aspiration of Senator Hillary Clinton and not to keep the unity of the Democratic Party as falsely claimed by the Governor to justify his action.

Governor Richardson has passionately campaigned for the presidency for more than a year on his diplomatic resume and as a Governor. During the debates, he was strongly claiming that he is the most qualified and experienced candidate to be president of the United States. This was his judgment on the campaign trail and now he has a different view about who should lead America. He said, “The 1990s is a decade of peace and prosperity because the competent and enlightened leadership of the Clinton Administration, but it is now time for a new generation of leadership to lead America forward.” If Richardson believes that a new generation of leadership without experience is the ultimate solution for the complex domestic and global problems America is facing, why did he, in the first place, decide to run for the president of the United States? Is he ready to relinquish his governorship to a young person regardless of experience? The only person who can provide us with answers to these questions is Governor Richardson alone. But we can also provide some possible answers. Why did he bother himself to mention about Hillary Clinton and President Clinton in his closing speech? Isn’t it clear that he unequivocally wavered about his long years of friendship with the Clinton family? Although Governor Richardson and Hillary Clinton are of the same age, is he, in his sound sense, consider her in another generation of leadership not able to lead America forward? Why did the Governor mention both Senator Hillary Clinton and President Clinton in his closing speech? Hillary is a candidate to the presidency and Bill Clinton is not. We should not expect such a behavior from a true friend. His years of experience should have helped him to make a proper judgment rather then seeking immediate political advantage with little regard for ultimate consequences. Democracy is a process that should not be interrupted without achieving the end result.

No matter what political opportunists say or do, Senator Hillary Clinton will continue to fight for us to bring real change that will turn the economy around, strengthen national security, improve the environment, and restore American credibility and leadership both at home and abroad. While endorsing Obama, the Governor said, “You understand the security challenge of the 21st century, and you will be an outstanding Commander in Chief.” He attempted to lay down a new model for being Commander in Chief and did not define it. Where is the litmus test? So far we have been repeatedly told that Obama did not support the war in Iraq. Like so many other Americans, he did not support the war but the speech alone does neither make Obama an extraordinary leader nor a person who would always make a sound judgment. Senator Obama has been a member of the church for nearly 20 years where his pastor made objectionable preaches from the pulpit and he has never uttered a word about any of the incidents until recently. Obama’s financier and close political support is now on trial. Do these major incidents make Obama a leader with a sound judgment? I very much doubt.

When considering these incidents, it is proper to question his credibility and judgment. It should be clear that judgment is a capacity to assess situations or circumstances objectively and to draw sound conclusions. This implies the imagination of possibilities and the scrutiny of their possible consequences, both negative and positive outcomes.

Does the Governor know that senator Obama failed to recognize the achievements registered during Bill Clinton’s Administration and instead praised the Republican political agenda of the 1980s? The Governor told Barack Obama, “You are an extraordinary leader who has shown courage, sound judgment and wisdom throughout your career.” Where is the evidence? Without substantiating evidence, the authenticity of the endorser’s claim as well as Obama’s eloquent speech does not make him an outstanding Commander in Chief from day one.
A political motivation that aims to increase one's political influence at almost any price, or a political style which involves seizing every and any opportunity to extend one's political influence, whenever such opportunities arise amounts to shifting positions for political expediency or political opportunism.

While the Governor has the right to support or endorse any candidate of his choice, the timing and the manner in which he has done and the way he mockingly treated the Clintons are absolutely unethical and objectionable. He mentioned their names as a footnote. He said that Obama has more delegates and the democrats have to stop the fighting and get prepared for the general election to face off the Republican nominee. Does the governor understand the concept of democracy? Hillary is not yet defeated and she is leading an effective campaign and there are millions of Americans who have not yet caste their votes. In Pennsylvania alone, poll trends indicate that Hillary is leading Obama by 17%. Does the Governor see this as a sign of defeat? While I was watching cnn, I observed that the Governor was so elated and too happy about his endorsement and have also shamefully disclosed to the press that the Clintons had approached and requested him for endorsement. He has also disclosed his intention to endorse Hillary Clinton and later changed his mind. Why is he passionately talking about it? Sadly, it appears that he drew some satisfaction from his shifting position of political expediency.

No matter what happens, Senator Hillary Clinton will continue fighting for us to make our lives better. She will also continue to demand that the voters of Michigan and Florida should not be disenfranchised. Hillary has an unshakable trust in all her supporters that they will stay with her and eventually march with her to the final victory. Those who sit on the political fence should, however, have some patience rather than hasty personal conclusion to jump into the opposite political camp.

As a democrat, Senator Hillary Clinton does not hold any bitterness against anybody for not supporting her or expressing views different from her own. While she appreciates the wide public support she has for her plan of action when she takes office in January 2009, there is no doubt she will serve all Americans regardless of political affiliation. She will be the president of all Americans and consider herself as being hired by all Americans for this important job.

Let us continue supporting Senator Hillary Clinton so that she fights for us!

Posted by a supporter of Hillary Clinton: 03-23-08

Hillary is still running for President because she is the best qualified for the job. She played a major role in running the country while being labeled "first lady". It is time for a strong Democrat to get this country on the right track and undo the damages the Republicans have caused us. With Obama's recent problems in the open, it makes me more aware than ever that prejudice in this country is not limited toward the blacks, but there is a real issue of prejudice by the blacks toward the white population. what the blacks don't realize is that the majority of our white population had nothing to do with the slave / segregation issues of decades ago. It is high time we all "put the past behind us" and strive as Christians for the benefit of our country and build a strong America we can live happily in together.
Of top importance, is the war in Iraq, and getting our solders home. The price of gas is totally out of control! The U.S. has many oil wells that we need to open up and use for cheap gas for ourselves; stop buying foreign oil that would force them to drop the prices by having a surplus and no sales. Health care costs for Americans is another issue. Affordable health insurance and medicine for all, regardless of income and ability to pay.
2008 is the year for us to put our priorities where they need be. Lord knows, with the direction we are heading ... no telling where we will end up in the near future!

In my opinion Obama will have to withdraw his candidacy soon. Remember that the media has finally just started to scrutinize him and you havent seen him squirm yet.. there is much to come.. His relationship with Rezko and all the lies about it, the relationship with Ayers, a terrorist, and now there is the realization that his "church" is actually a Black Liberation Theology church.. that means Obama , who has been a member for 20 years believes that Jesus is black and God loves blacks and hates whites and that blacks hate whites..and should by any means destroy whites. Does that sound like a platform for a presidential candidate?? I also know that his books can be perused and the lies exposed. He just has too much that cannot be explained if in fact he was a viable candidate. His electiblility is dropping every day and his desire to now debate racism with the media is simply a smoke screen to divert attention from his very deep rift with the voters now.. black and white..he has lied too many times.. he no longer has believability and his judgment is almost non existent.. does this sound like anyone that could or should be our president?? I think not. More than that, I think that we need to consider the safety and security of our country and it's citizens if Black Liberation Theology is going to be the dictator of what happens to us.