
Lovely Lichtenstein is a haven for tax evaders.
Should governments destroy tax havens?
Little Lichtenstein is a great country in which to avoid paying taxes. It's a tax haven -- a place where foreigners claim residency to skirt paying high taxes back home. Bermuda and the Cayman Islands are tax havens, too. Naturally, the European Union, the United States and other revenue-hungry governments are doing everything they can to root out tax evaders and collect the tax.
But Lichtenstein's rulers say they are just offering a valuable service in a competetive global marketplace.
Are tax havens unfair? Should the U.S. do more to root out tax dodgers and punish countries that provide tax havens? Or do the economic benefits of tax havens outweigh the costs?















Thoughts
Legitimate vs. Criminal
Submitted on March 21st, 2008 by ChronicHypocriteI really enjoyed Daniel Mitchell's article, and it has gone a long way in helping me form my own opinion on the issue of tax havens. A part of me applauds this "virtuous race to the bottom"; I tend to get particularly indignant when I see the enormous amount of wasteful spending of tax payer dollars (or whatever your currency of choice). Unfortunately, I feel we must have much more oversight of these tax havens. Besides legitimate corporations attempting to protect their profit and investors, these tax havens serve as money laundering havens for criminal enterprises. I would like to see more transparency in this industry so legitimate business can continue to grow and not be stifled by excessive taxes, and criminals find it more difficult to launder their ill gotten gains.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to an inherently sick society