Pulling down Saddam's statues
The Associated Press

Saddam Hussein's statues fell, but the bloodshed hasn't stopped.

Featured Topic | Posted 37 weeks 12 hours ago

The Iraq War turns five: Is victory possible?

Five years ago this week, the United States introduced "shock-and-awe" to Iraq, drove Saddam Hussein from power, and began a years-long occupation and counter-insurgency operation that Pentagon planners did not fully anticipate. Five years on, some 4,000 U.S. troops are dead, tens of thousands more have been injured, millions of Iraqis have been displaced, and the fighting continues.

Yet there has been progress, too. Little by little, in places like Anbar province, Iraqis are beginning to see a normal life without terror or intimidation. And Iraq may yet be a strong U.S. ally in the Middle East.

Was it worth it? Is Iraq a central front in the war on terrorism? And if victory is not at hand, what should victory look like? Above all, when and how should the war end?

Read More

Ben likes: Five years on, the war and its lessons

Jules Crittenden/The Weekly Standard

We're five years into the war in Iraq now. Nearly 4,000 Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed. Thousands more Americans and Iraqis have seen their lives shattered in what became the premier killing zone of a global war. But death and combat no longer make the front pages; the drama has been bled out of it, and the war has taken a back seat in the presidential campaign. Rather than maturing in time of war, the American people seem eager to put it out of mind.

After 1989, we were encouraged to believe that war was history. This illusion made the shock of 9/11 all the worse. Even then some people wanted to believe it was an aberration, something we had brought on ourselves and could fix with kind words and deeds. The ease of the Taliban's ouster then created the false impression that we had managed to reinvent war in a more palatable form. In fact, all we've managed to do as a nation over six-and-a-half years of war is confuse ourselves.

Read More

Joel likes: A failure of strategy

Matthew Yglesias/The Atlantic

Iraq has been, first and foremost, a strategic miscalculation based on a disastrously wrongheaded conception of the strategic challenge revealed on 9/11/01.

The United States had a chance to implement a focused, disciplined effort to go after al-Qaeda and remove the threat but instead George W. Bush, aided and abetted by a wide swathe of elites, chose to go in for a broad-brush vision of a "war on terror" whose centerpiece would be the invasion and occupation of a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 and no meaningful relationship with al-Qaeda. The costs of that decision have been enormous, not just in terms of the tragedy that's played out for American soldiers and Iraqis of all stripes, but in terms of the opportunity cost of totally reorienting America's foreign policy and defense priorities away from useful things and toward Iraq instead.

Read More

Where do you stand on this issue?

Click on the graph to cast your vote.
average
vote
your vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google