David Simon, creator of The Wire
The Associated Press

David Simon's bleak vision defined five seasons of "The Wire."

Featured Topic | Posted 38 weeks 14 hours ago

How was the finale of "The Wire?"

In "The Wire's" Baltimore, nobody escapes the consequences of rebelling. It's only a matter of time before the gods get around to killing the peskiest flies. The HBO drama, which ended its run after five seasons Sunday night, was not a ratings winner but it was a critical favorite.

The fact that brave choices are usually punished within the world of "The Wire" fits with creator David Simon's worldview, which holds that individuals are capable of change, but institutions are not.

So, what does "The Wire" and its bleak point-of-view say about America? What was your favorite part of the show? And did the finale live up to your expectations?

Read More

Ben likes: They’re not TV cops, they’re cops on The Wire

Jack Dunphy/National Review Online

In David Simon’s dramatic world, as in the real one, tidy resolutions to complex problems are not so easily achieved. As any cop knows, as does Simon, the bad guys are not always so bad.

And the good guys are not always so good, which is why The Wire’s cops are so compelling to watch. There have been isolated instances of police corruption depicted on the show, but for the most part the cops are honest, even as they struggle within a system that seems determined to see them fail. They cut corners here and there, they defy their preening superiors, and they get comfortable operating in that vast gray area that lies between outright corruption and by-the-book police work. In short, like all the show’s characters, they’re real.

Read More

Joel likes: Like "The Wire?" You're living it

Marc Bousquet/Chronicle of Higher Education

What the show grasps is that private corporate and public institutional managers both employ “quality” in an Orwellian register in which a “quality process” is one of continuously increasing workload and continuously eroding salary and benefits, with a single, doltish mantra employed everywhere — in police departments, in social services, and school systems, just as on college campuses: the perpetual command to “Do More With Less.”

As Time magazine television critic James Poniewozik observes, what this actually means “is doing less with less and cutting corners to make it look like more.” Hence the need for assessment instruments that everyone inside an organization understands to be trivial and easily spun to nearly any purpose by agile institutional actors.

Read More

Where do you stand on this issue?

Click on the graph to cast your vote.
average
vote
your vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google