The greening of the U.S. of A. still has a ways to go. We're plundering Canada's tar sands and mining the Midwest's topsoil to keep our cars on the road. We lay waste to ton after ton of Chinese coal to fuel our cheap-stuff habit. And so on.
But if our habits remain environmentally ruinous, the strategies we use to sell stuff have gone decidedly green.
In general, the advertising industry exists to move product, to urge us to consume as much as possible; and we're at a point in time when it would be really, really smart to consume less. So my question is: does the green-is-the-new-black trend augur an era of less, and smarter, consumption -- or is it the death rattle of a movement in the process of being subsumed into a culture of ravenous consumption?
Thoughts
For those who like a little apocalypse with their morning coffee
Submitted on March 1st, 2008 by Joel...there's this in the Guardian:
I'm just going to go wrap myself up in a blanket.
It's unfortunate for the hybrid
Submitted on February 29th, 2008 by Chuck_Johnsonthat the green movement has sanctified the hybrid car.
For starters, government locks technology. Why design (or buy) a new, better more fuel efficient car if government has already chosen certain ones and you have to lobby to get yours recognized?
As the reason article makes clear, giving hybrids more parking places or certain stickers can lead to inefficiencies that might be worse than having the hybrid in the first place!