James K. Galbraith/The American Prospect
Did jobs leave the United States to take advantage of cheaper Mexican labor? Of course, some did. Were American workers pressured to cut wages, because of Mexican competition? Of course, some were. But that happened because of Mexico, not because of NAFTA. Mexico would not disappear if NAFTA did. From the standpoint of American workers, NAFTA and its successors are just scapegoats. The fact is, China has since passed Mexico as the prime out-sourcing threat, even though we have no "free trade" agreement with China.
Let's therefore stop scapegoating the Mexicans and the Chinese, and accept that they must have their role, which they will largely determine by their own actions, in the world in which we all live. Let's concentrate, instead, on getting things right for workers right here. Let's raise wages, create jobs, support unions, deliver services -- and especially, let's cut the inequalities in our structure of pay.
Thoughts
Reasons We Might
Submitted on February 24th, 2008 by Chuck_JohnsonCould someone explain to me how banning access to a higher standard (i.e. NAFTA, North American Union, etc.) of living squares with Barack's "hope"?
Maybe the change he wants is protectionist in nature. After all, his trade record is abysmal.