The 2008 campaign has reminded the public overseas, and especially in allied countries, of the diversity and vibrancy of American democracy. It is hard for even the most hardened anti-American not to be impressed by the fact that the Democrats will nominate either an African-American or a women as their candidate, while watching this twisting and turning campaign play out gives the lie to the view that United States is some kind of corporate oligarchy.
Another piece of good news is that all three candidates with a realistic chance of being the next president play well abroad in a way that George W. Bush does not. Indeed, with a more pro-American leadership in Europe and the sting being drawn from Iraq by the success of the surge, the next president will have a real window of opportunity to chalk up some quick wins in 2009. The rest of the democratic world will be keen to show America that cooperating is worth its while.
Thoughts
Re: Winning the war on terror
Submitted on February 2nd, 2008 by BenNo question the Bush administration has done a dismal job waging the idea war. But the way this war gets won is to ensure the jihadists know that the terrorist's life is a wasted life. Even the Cold War wasn't bloodless.
Winning the war on terror
Submitted on February 2nd, 2008 by JoelThis actually confirms my belief that in a "war on terror," our best weapon is not our military -- though we certainly need the security it can provide -- but America itself. ANd that's why it's more dangerous for us to react (as we so often have) in the wrong ways to the threat of terrorism: We are stronger against radicals when we embrace our ideals instead of our fears.