If Bush 41 started the

If Bush 41 started the cutbacks and Clinton continued them then why is it all on Clinton? Seems like the pentagon said that they would be capable of a 2 ocean war under Clintons proposals. Since Russia was gone wasn't that suppose to be one of the benefits that we didn't need such a large military? Besides I'd say that gutted military was able to cut through Iraq pretty well. It's not Clintons fault 7 years later that we don't have large enough military and have had to resort to stop loss, lowering standards, raising the age limits and offering far larger bonuses. It isn't Clintons fault that Bush has gone through all of this and still has a hard time meeting Army recruiting goals.

Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <u> <strike> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

2008 Democratic Convention

Links to Rocky Mountain News RSS feeds.

Ads by Google