"Male domination". You give off the impression that women have no contribution to affairs at all. FIRST baby step? Have you not realized that if not for the women in the past, women would not have the right to vote. Women would be unable to have their own jobs. Women wouldn't even be given the option to run for any political office in the first place. Whch their is so many of already.True we do live in a male dominant society, but as the saying goes, "Behind every great man, is a woman." Woman have had their hand in politics long before they had any reasonable rights. They would 'convince' their husbands, fathers, brothers, to vote, support anyone the woman wanted them to while still making them believe it was their ideas. Having a woman president is NOT going to change women suffering from this 'Battered Wife Syndrome' you speak of. I think that women are only depending so much on their husbands because it's the 'easy-way-out' approach on life. Let the husband cater to your every need? Sounds like the wife is too dependent, not weak. After all, you have to have at least a little strength to bring a new life into the world.
However, I honestly don't see how that is completely relevant to birth control anyway. Please stay on topic. I'm all for 'male dominance' to come to an end and have a true equality between the sexes, but as long as men believe they are physically stronger than women and women believe they are smarter than men, with both genders under the false pretense that they are surely better, it is not an option. Back on topic, birth control is an option. tomcatin4u is completely right in saying that birth control is not killing or anything of the sort, but merely preventing.
Reply
Search
Join the Debate
Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!
Relevance is Necessary
Submitted on May 9th, 2008 by classiclife"Male domination". You give off the impression that women have no contribution to affairs at all. FIRST baby step? Have you not realized that if not for the women in the past, women would not have the right to vote. Women would be unable to have their own jobs. Women wouldn't even be given the option to run for any political office in the first place. Whch their is so many of already.True we do live in a male dominant society, but as the saying goes, "Behind every great man, is a woman." Woman have had their hand in politics long before they had any reasonable rights. They would 'convince' their husbands, fathers, brothers, to vote, support anyone the woman wanted them to while still making them believe it was their ideas. Having a woman president is NOT going to change women suffering from this 'Battered Wife Syndrome' you speak of. I think that women are only depending so much on their husbands because it's the 'easy-way-out' approach on life. Let the husband cater to your every need? Sounds like the wife is too dependent, not weak. After all, you have to have at least a little strength to bring a new life into the world.
However, I honestly don't see how that is completely relevant to birth control anyway. Please stay on topic. I'm all for 'male dominance' to come to an end and have a true equality between the sexes, but as long as men believe they are physically stronger than women and women believe they are smarter than men, with both genders under the false pretense that they are surely better, it is not an option. Back on topic, birth control is an option. tomcatin4u is completely right in saying that birth control is not killing or anything of the sort, but merely preventing.