Topics

Pope Benedict XVI speaks to a crowd.
The Associated Press

Pope Benedict XVI inflamed Muslims. Now can he reason with them?

Featured Topic | Posted 44 weeks 2 days ago

Muslims and the Pope: Is a meaningful dialogue possible?

In 2006, Pope Benedict XVI gave a long speech at Regensburg University about faith and reason. In the midst of his talk, the Pope quoted a 14th century Byzantine emperor who spoke negatively of Islam. The line sparked violent protests across the Islamic world. But it also sparked discussion about what divides -- and possibly unites -- Muslims and Christians. Muslim clerics and Vatican officials begin talks this week that they hope will lead to an unprecedented Catholic-Islamic meeting.

What do Muslims and Christians have to discuss? Is productive dialogue a realistic goal?

Read More

Ben likes: What the Islamic scholars forgot to tell the Pope

Patrick Poole/Pajamas Media

There is one thing, however, amidst all the flowery overtures, theological discussion, and representations of religious pluralism that the Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute and the 138 Islamic scholars forgot to mention: The Institute, which operates a website, AlTafsir.com, which it calls “the largest and greatest online collection of Quranic commentary, translation, recitation, and essential resources in the world,” includes in an “Ask the Mufti” section a number of fatwas on apostasy issued by the Institute’s chief scholar, Sheikh Hijjawi, that call for the death of Christian reverts (Christians converting to Islam and then returning to the Christian faith) and Muslim apostates. Further they state that if the Christian reverts and Muslim apostates are not killed, they should be deprived of all rights and accorded the status of non-persons.

Read More

Joel likes: The pope and Islam

Jane Kramer/The New Yorker

Benedict’s second goal is reciprocity with Islam. He wants to use his papacy to restore to Christian minorities in Muslim countries the same freedom of religion that most Muslims enjoy in the West. The question of reciprocity is hardly new, but it was never a priority at the Vatican before Benedict’s reign. John Paul II avoided it, on his travels, by saying, in effect, “I go for the country, not the religion.” Benedict has pretty much made it a precondition for relations between the Vatican and the Muslim world. He clearly thinks that the JudeoChristian West has been self-destructively shortsighted in its concessions to the Islamic diaspora, when few, if any, concessions are made to Christians and Jews in most of the Middle East.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

Celebrating independence in Kosovo. But was the party over before it began?

Featured Topic | Posted 46 weeks 4 days ago

Independence for Kosovo: Blessing or curse?

So this is what foreign policy types mean by Balkanization. The Serbian province of Kosovo declared independence on Sunday, after years of violence among ethnic Albanians, who are mostly Muslim, and Serbs, who are primarily Christian.

Although the United States supports Kosovo's eventual independence, the Russian-backed Serbian government promises not to let the Kosovars go quietly. Violence erupted across Serbia and Kosovo in the hours after independence was declared.

This is a full-fledged international crisis. Is the time right for Kosovo's independence? What role should the United States play? What should the United Nations do? Is autonomy always the answer?

Read More

Ben likes: Be wise on Kosovo

Walid Phares/The American Thinker

The crisis of Kosovo is a crossroads with two directions. Either the Western alliance will acquiesce to wrong policies and end up being responsible for future ethnic violence and the spread of Jihadi forces in the region; or a new democracy alliance would become enlightened enough to find the appropriate solutions to all ethnic crisis in the former Yugoslavia on the one hand and stop the advancing Jihadi tentacles from reaching the belly of southern Europe.

Read More

Joel likes: Here comes Kosovo

Roger Cohen/New York Times

Kosovo is not Transdniestria or Abkhazia or South Ossetia. It is an anachronistic remnant of a now defunct country, Yugoslavia, a province that has been under U.N. administration for eight years pending a final settlement impossible within Serbia. Milosevic rolled the dice of genocidal nationalism and lost.

In the long run, I believe this outcome will be positive for Serbia. Instead of dwelling on medieval battles, victory-in-defeat symbolism, shrinking borders and a poisonous culture of victimization, Serbia will begin to see what it wrought and look forward — to the West rather than the East.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google