Topics

Obama and burgers
The Associated Press

Barack Obama chows on a burger with some supporters in Muncie, Ind., just like a regular guy.

Featured Topic | Posted 38 weeks 4 days ago

Obama and 'bitter' rural American life: Is he right or wrong?

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, known for his skills as an orator, conceded today that comments he made at a private San Francisco fundraiser about working-class Democrats clinging to "guns or religion" were poorly chosen.

Read More

Ben likes: Hicks nix clique's shticks

Mark Steyn/The Corner

Barack Obama's condescension reveals a man out of touch with the rhythms of American life to a degree that's hard to fathom. As Michelle says, they "chose" to "leave corporate America", and Barack became a "community organizer" and she wound up a 350-grand-a-year "diversity outreach coordinator". I've no idea what either of those careers involve, and most of us seem able to get along without them. But their remoteness from the American mainstream perhaps explains why the Obamas seem to have no clue how Americans live their lives.

And yes, I'm a foreigner. But it takes one to know one.

Read More

Joel likes: Back to the campaign

Ezra Klein/The American Prospect

It's worth saying that I'm not defending Obama here. I see nothing that he needs defense from. There's no actual attack being levied that anyone can rebut, or ideas being tossed out that anyone can argue. Instead, Obama has said something Politically Damaging. And it will Damage him. And we'll all watch to see how badly.

But let's be clear: It's not damaging because we think it foretells him doing something harmful to the country. It's not damaging because it suggests his policy agenda is poorly conceived, or his priorities are awry. It matters only because it matters, not because it means anything about Obama, or illuminates anything about his potential presidency. It's a hollow scandal. 

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

 President Bush, surrounded by cabinet members, signs a letter sending the Colombia Free Trade Agreement to Congress.

Featured Topic | Posted 39 weeks 3 hours ago

Is free trade with Colombia in America's interest?

The United States has few friends in Latin America. But Colombia is one of those friends. The U.S. relationship with Colombia reached a perilous crossroads this week when the House of Representatives deferred a vote on a bilateral free trade agreement with the country, just two days after the White House submitted the pact for ratification.

Read More

Ben likes: Nancy Pelosi's bad faith

Wall Street Journal

The Democratic Party's protectionist make-over was completed yesterday, when Nancy Pelosi decided to kill the Colombia free trade agreement. Her objections had nothing to do with the evidence and everything to do with politics, but this was an act of particular bad faith. It will damage the economic and security interests of the U.S. while trashing our best ally in Latin America. Even if the free trade agreement is somehow removed from cold storage, Ms. Pelosi's cheating is a first-order strategic blunder. Colombia is one of America's closest friends in a hostile region menaced by Hugo Chávez's Venezuela. For all the talk of repairing the U.S. "image" in the world, the Democrats don't really mind harming that image if it pleases the AFL-CIO.

Read More

Joel likes: Our missing free trade strategy

Harold Meyerson/Washington Post

What's been missing in America's trade policy is a preference for Americans. The object of trade in China is to help the Chinese nation. German trade is designed to help Germany; Scandinavian, to help the Scandinavian nations. This is not the case here. General Electric goes abroad to lower costs and boost profits. Goldman Sachs invests abroad in the same kind of low-wage, high-profit enterprises. That's the mission of such businesses. But the U.S. government has never taken on the mission of defending the American economy, or the American people, in the global economy. That is not the only reason the broadly shared prosperity of the three decades following World War II is now a distant memory, but it is a certainly a major reason. In the absence of such a national economic strategy, is it any wonder that by margins of better than two to one, Americans now oppose free trade?

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton criticize NAFTA in Ohio, but Texas is choked with incoming traffic from Mexico.

Featured Topic | Posted 44 weeks 2 days ago

Can Obama be trusted on free trade?

So, is Barack Obama in favor of preserving the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), or would he renegotiate its terms? Does Obama want to expand free trade agreements between the United States and other countries, such as Colombia? Or does Barack Obama prefer trade agreements that protect labor unions and require extensive environmental rules?

These should be fairly straightforward questions, but somehow Obama's position on trade has become a matter of controversy. Some campaign insiders have said Obama’s protectionist stand on the trail was “more reflective of political maneuvering than policy.”

Should the next president revisit free trade? Or have free trade agreements such as NAFTA benefited the United States as a whole?

Read More

Ben likes: Sage's sagacity

New York Sun

Warren Buffett's advice on trade is exactly the opposite of the NAFTA-bashing message that the billionaire's preferred presidential candidates, Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton, have been offering to the voters of Ohio. It's more in line with the pro-NAFTA message that Mr. Obama's economic aides have been assuring Canada he will hew once the primary season is over, and with the pro-Nafta message on which President Clinton rode to re-election in 1996. But on the record, Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton are on this issue singing from a different hymnal than Mr. Buffett.

Read More

Joel likes: More concerns on Obama, trade

John Nichols/The Nation

Focus in on this core question: Is Barack Obama playing games with the trade issue that he has made central to his appeal to the voters of Wisconsin, Ohio and other industrial states where concerns about deals such as NAFTA runs deep?

And if he is doing so, will he end up planting the seeds of distrust similar to those planted by Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004 on the trade issue? If he is talking out of both sides of his mouth, and if there are more revelations to come in this regard, then Obama is doing serious damage to his fall prospects as a Democratic presidential nominee.

Obama sounds a lot better than Gore or Kerry. That may be enough for a primary fight. But if he wants to win the presidency, he is going to need to be a lot better.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google