Topics

Texas polygamy protest
The Associated Press

Not everyone thinks the raid on a Texas polygamist sect's compound last month was good for the hundreds of children taken by state authorities.

Featured Topic | Posted 28 weeks 5 days ago

Is the press misreporting the Texas polygamy case?

The disturbing polygamy and alleged child abuse case unfolding in Texas raises difficult questions about two ideals Americans hold dear: Religious freedom and child safety.

Read More

Ben likes: Children of the cult

Rod Dreher/Crunchy Con

My default position is that the authorities must not hesitate to go in to protect children who may be being abused. But I also have strong beliefs about the sanctity of the family, and believe that the state should interpose itself between family members only as a last resort -- which, obviously, an abusive situation requires.

But what is abuse? Is it always clear? Under the law, there's no doubt at all that having sex with underage teenage girls is by definition a crime, whether or not you call her your "wife." In the state of Texas, a person under the age of 16 cannot consent to marriage. And obviously, polygamous marriages are not recognized as marriages. If teenage girls are being forced into polygamous marriages and into sexual relationships, the state has a responsibility to get in there and stop it. If no one will protect those minors, the state must.

But. I've been trying to think about this situation in light of the fact that the fundamentalist LDS cult (Tom Wolfe says the difference between a "cult" and a religion is political power) is unpopular, and I certainly find their beliefs and lifestyle repulsive. But this is a free country, and as such, I have to tolerate a certain amount of repulsiveness; my own religious freedom depends on it, and so do yours. But tolerance can only go so far. 

Read More

Joel likes: Kids' safety overrides First and Fourth amendments

Ed Kociela/Southern Utah Spectrum

As a hyper-proponent of the First and Fourth amendments, it took a long time, but, after looking at the facts carefully, it is impossible not to defend and praise Texas officials for removing more than 400 children from the Yearning For Zion ranch in Eldorado, Texas, owned by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

Look, I vigorously defend the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of religion. I also vigorously defend the Fourth Amendment that guarantees that the cops can't bust down your door without reasonable cause. However, the facts speak for themselves:

  • Of the 53 girls between the ages of 14 and 17 who were removed from the Texas compound, 31 either already have children or are pregnant.
  • Texas authorities are now saying there is evidence that boys, as well as the young girls, may have been victims of physical or sexual abuse.
  • Medical examinations indicate that nearly 10 percent of the children have broken bones. In the real world, less than 1 percent of American children suffer a broken bone each year, according to one source.

These are, as Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said, members of the FLDS church who "wouldn't be in Texas if we didn't kick them out of Utah." Shurtleff defends Utah and Arizona law enforcement, which was roughed up pretty good a few days earlier by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who accused Shurtleff and his Arizona counterpart, Terry Goddard, of turning a "blind eye" to polygamy.

 

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

A big reason to stay at home for a few weeks?

Featured Topic | Posted 32 weeks 3 days ago

Should government mandate paid maternity leave?

New Jersey's Senate on Monday voted to provide paid family leave in the state. The measure will provide up to six weeks paid leave to care for a newborn, newly adopted child or a seriously ill family member. Workers taking the leave would receive up to two-thirds of their salary (up to a maximum of $524 weekly), which would be funded by an 0.09 percent tax on workers' salaries that would amount to an average of roughly $33 a year.

Read More

Ben likes: Damsels in Distress?

John Stossel, Capitalism Magazine

I understand her pain. Elizabeth has a lot of responsibility: a full-time job, plus two young kids at home. I would find it overwhelming. But does that mean the government should impose leave, day care, and flex-time policies on employers or make taxpayers bear the cost for the choices women make?

No!

All these well-intended laws have unintended consequences, and the consequences are usually worse than the problem they were meant to solve. When governments require companies to provide paid maternity leave and other benefits, many firms avoid hiring women. How is that good for women?

Read More

Joel likes: Catching up on family values

New York Times

Business groups argue that paid leave would encourage significantly more workers to take time off and that replacing them would be too burdensome for small companies. However, a legislative study in California suggests these fears may be unfounded. During the first year of the program, which took effect in 2004, only about 1 percent of the eligible employees filed for benefits — a number that has not increased significantly since.

A survey by the McGill Institute for Health and Social Policy reports that 169 countries offer mothers paid maternal leave and 66 offer new fathers paid leave. Thirty-nine nations grant paid leave to workers whose children are ill, and 23 offer it to employees to care for other family members.

It’s time for more states in America to follow suit. Better yet, Congress should make paid family leave national policy. Elected officials would then be in a better position to talk about the importance of the family without sounding hypocritical.

 

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Texas polygamist sect
The Associated Press

A Texas group practices polygamy... where does religious liberty end and law begin?

Featured Topic | Posted 32 weeks 3 days ago

Feds raid a polygamist's compound: What's wrong with that?

More than 400 children, mostly girls in pioneer dresses, were swept into state custody from a polygamist sect in what authorities described Monday as the largest child-welfare operation in Texas history. The dayslong raid on the sprawling compound built by now-jailed polygamist leader Warren Jeffs was sparked by a 16-year-old girl's call to authorities that she was being abused and that girls as young as 14 and 15 were being forced into marriages with much older men.

Read More

Ben likes: Twin relics of barbarism

John Eastman/The Claremont Institute

In 1856, the Republican Party -- the party of Abraham Lincoln -- included in its platform a stinging criticism of slavery and polygamy, referring to the two institutions as the "twin relics of barbarism." Slavery was barbaric because it deprived some human beings of their liberty, one of the unalienable rights bestowed on all men, all human beings, by our "Creator," to use the words of the Declaration of Independence. Polygamy was barbaric because, as the Supreme Court later recognized, it undermined the concept of marriage, an institution that is necessary for a free society and therefore essential to the consensual government necessary to vindicate the unalienable rights described in the Declaration.

Read More

Joel likes: Prairie justice

Ellen Goodman

Warren Jeffs is the autocrat and reigning prophet of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (FLDS), a polygamous community of about 10,000 that regards itself as the one true Mormon faith. It survives much to the embarrassment of mainstream Mormons, who gave up polygamy in 1890, and much to the horror of the state.

Jeffs is either deeply creepy or downright evil depending on how you label religious leaders who consider themselves the voice of God and marry multiple women, including 30 of their late father’s youngest widows. He is infamous, among other things, for kicking hundreds of teenage boys out of his community and matching hundreds of their sisters into plural marriages. For those hooked on “Big Love,” Jeffs makes Alby Grant look appealing.

No, polygamy is not on trial. But its history is interwoven with questions of consent. Opponents to plural marriage in the 19th century included women’s rights advocates who equated polygamy with slavery. No mature woman, they believed, would voluntarily enslave herself.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

We're seeing fewer of these scenes.

Featured Topic | Posted 37 weeks 6 days ago

Why are fewer people having children?

The "demographic winter" is coming. So warns a new documentary of the same name. What is the demographic winter? The phrase, according to the film's promotional materials, "denotes the worldwide decline in birthrates, also referred to as the 'birth dearth,' and what that portends." The first half of Demographic Winter was previewed at the conservative Heritage Foundation a couple of weeks ago.

According the film, the demographic winter suggests little good, e.g., economic collapse and social deterioration. If current trends continue world population should begin a steep decline sometime around the middle of the 21st century.

Why? And is it true? Are overpopulation worries overblown?

Read More

Ben likes: Creepy, short-sighted, (and ultimately juvenile) libertarianism

Joseph Knippenberg/No Left Turns

One of the things that makes us human is feeling and living up to responsibilities for others, which is manifest much more powerfully in child-rearing than even in marriage (especially if you’re talking about two "autonomous adults," each of whom is earning an income sufficient to support himself or herself). Ronald Bailey, the author of the Reason magazine article, seems to run away from adulthood because it isn’t much fun. The libertarians I respect are grown-ups who aren’t afraid of grown-up responsibilities.

Read More

Joel likes: Missing: The 'right' babies

Katherine Joyce/The Nation

The nativist motivations for such campaigns move beyond the subliminal at times. Elizabeth Krause, an anthropologist and author of "A Crisis of Births: Population Politics and Family-Making in Italy," tracked that country's population efforts over the past decade and found politicians demanding more babies "to keep away the armadas of immigrants from the southern shores of the Mediterranean" and priests calling for a "Christian dike against the Muslim invasion of Italy." The racial preferences behind Berlusconi's "baby bonus" came into embarrassing relief when immigrant parents were accidentally sent checks for their offspring and then asked to return the money: the Italian government hadn't meant to promote those births.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google