Topics

Al Gore
The Associated Press

Al Gore discusses his new, $300 million climate change awareness campaign.

Featured Topic | Posted 33 weeks 3 days ago

Al Gore launches $300 million climate change campaign: Hope or hype?

At long last, Nobel Laureate, Academy Award winner and former Vice President Al Gore this week is launching his campaign...

...to push climate change higher on the nation’s political agenda. So what's new about that?

Read More

Ben likes: Gore's global-warming alarmism is overblown

Steven F. Hayward/National Review

After a year of concentrated effort that includes a multimillion-dollar p.r. campaign on top of An Inconvenient Truth and slavish media coverage parroting the climate-alarmist line, recent polls show that public opinion on global warming has barely budged. Only about a third of Americans, according to a recent Gallup survey, are agitated about climate change, and even people who say the environment is their most important issue rank climate change behind air and water quality in importance.

Meanwhile a backlash in the scientific community has begun. New York Times veteran science reporter William Broad filed a devastating article about scientists who are “alarmed” at Gore’s alarmism; Gore’s account of global warming goes far beyond the evidence. The dissents from Gore’s extremism, Broad explained, “come not only from conservative groups and prominent skeptics of catastrophic warming, but also from rank-and-file scientists” who have “no political ax to grind.” It appears Gore refused to be interviewed directly for the article; he responded to e-mail questions only.

Read More

Joel likes: This will mean the world to us

Chris Mooney/The American Prospect

Thanks to Al Gore and others, global warming has gone mainstream. An issue that floated around the peripheries of policy-making for far too long is now triggering unheard of levels of media attention and a rash of legislative proposals.

Even the Bush administration seems to feel the pressure. Although mixed signals continued well into 2006, it's no longer possible to argue that the president and his administration reject mainstream climate science. They've copped to the conclusion that humans are driving global warming, and so have many of the current Republican presidential candidates. Though not as gung ho as Democrats, even many mainstream Republicans see the need to address global warming, with big state governors Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Charlie Crist of Florida leading the way on behalf of their party.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Al Gore at An Inconvenient Truth premiere
The Associated Press

Is Al Gore ready for his second act? Is America?

Featured Topic | Posted 34 weeks 2 days ago

Is a Gore-led ticket still possible?

Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton will be the Democrats' nominee to face Republican John McCain in the November presidential election, right? Right?

Read More

Ben likes: Al Gore is inevitable

John Derbyshire/National Review Online

What to do? What to do? The party bosses are slumped in their seats, staring blankly into space, or doing job searches on their Blackberries. All is gloom and despondency.

Then … A fanfare of trumpets! A shaft of light! Into the hall rides a man on a white stallion! Stirred from their lethargy, the delegates begin rising from their seats. They start cheering and applauding. The rider reaches the podium, dismounts, and strides to the dais. The applause is deafening now. Cheers ring round the hall! Women are weeping; men are hugging each other.

Broad-shouldered and confident, his sternocleidomastoid muscle flexing and rippling, the Rescuer sweeps his powerful gaze around the hall. A hush falls. He begins to speak. As he speaks, the same though settles on every listener simultaneously: This is the one. He has always been the one. What fools we have been!

Don’t think it couldn’t happen. Don’t, in fact, think it isn’t going to happen. The Democratic party has two lame candidates, without a dime’s worth of executive experience between them.

Read More

Joel likes: Gore, more than before

Larry Abrams/Huffington Post

Al Gore has many things to recommend him. As opposed to Hillary, he actually is quite experienced. Hillary's supposed 35 years of experience consists of exactly seven years of elective office.

As opposed to Obama, Gore really is a candidate of systemic change, and he's got the Nobel Prize to prove it.

Gore is not only the best Democratic candidate who could be put up at this point, he might end up being the only alternative at a deadlocked convention.

A Gore-Obama ticket would be a winning Democratic combination -- for a change -- in November. 

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Ralph Nader
The Associated Press

Will he win this time? (No.)

Featured Topic | Posted 38 weeks 5 days ago

Spoiler? Ralph Nader runs for president. Again.

Ralph Nader is running for president again. He's widely blamed for taking votes from Al Gore in 2000 and handing the presidency to George W. Bush.

Read More

Ben likes: Nader's glitter

Thomas Sowell/Human Events

The automobile fatality rate per miles driven was less than one-third as high when "Unsafe at Any Speed" was published as it was back in the 1920s. But facts never carry as much weight as a dramatic vision of "corporate greed" sacrificing helpless consumers until they are rescued by "consumer advocates" and federal regulations. For the left, Nader was playing their song and they danced to it.

In one of his earliest writings, Nader said, "the consumer must be protected at times from his own indiscretion and vanity." In other words, he wanted the Ralph Naders of the world to be able to dictate to consumers and producers alike. It's all about him. So is running for president.

Read More

Joel likes: Nader launches fourth unsuccessful bid

Steve Benen/The Carpetbagger Report

Nader insisted this morning that there’s a real hunger in the country for a third-party candidate, but there’s ample evidence to the contrary.

To be sure, it’s likely that Nader’s ability to influence election results has passed. After “peaking” in 2000, with 2.7% of the popular vote, Nader dropped to 0.38% in 2004 (which was even worse than the 0.7% he garnered in 1996). It stands to reason that he’ll fare no better in 2008.

But given all of this, why bother? Why would someone with an impressive legacy on behalf of consumers take additional steps to make his enemies happy, his allies resentful, and his reputation tarnished?

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote