Topics

Bush at the White House
The Associated Press

President Bush, strolling near the Rose Garden, announced a climate change plan today.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Bush announces global warming goals: Too little, too late?

Revising his stance on global warming, President Bush today proposed a new target for stopping the growth of the nation's greenhouse gas emissions by 2025. President Bush also called for putting the brakes on greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants within 10 to 15 years.

Read More

Ben likes: Bush raises the temp on global warming

Tony Blankley/Washington Times

Mr. Bush doesn't intend all the catastrophic consequences of his simple decision to offer legislation to regulate carbon emission. But then, by this point he should be quite familiar with the concept of unintended consequences. And he needs to recognize that he cannot pass "sensible "legislation. (I have serious doubts that any legislation on this topic could be sensible.)

All he can do is set the stage for next year's legislation, by giving away the rhetorical store and weakening the already modest backbone of Republican legislators. The liberal world order will not let go of their global-warming assault on free economies until hell freezes over -- by which point, obviously, the global-warming theory will be visibly disproven.

Read More

Joel likes: Bush's climate change fakeout

Dan Froomkin/Washington Post

It took so long for Bush to even acknowledge the human role in global warming that whenever he even mentions the topic, some people act like it's big news.

But in an era where a consensus has emerged that forceful action is required to save the planet, Bush's essentially empty words are not very different from silence. And to the extent that their intent is to subvert sincere attempts to find solutions, they're actually worse.

Bush's trick on climate change is to wait until others are about to embrace mandatory limits on greenhouse gases, then make a major speech about goals and process, without any specifics on measures or penalties.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

A robust coal mining industry is fueling China's economic growth.

Featured Topic | Posted 38 weeks 22 hours ago

U.S. ready to embrace greenhouse gas cuts -- if China and India do, too

Surprising news from a White House with a reputation for slighting evidence of global climate change: A Bush administration spokesman on Wednesday said the United States would embrace a "binding international agreement" to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. But the emphasis is on "international."

"It is highly likely we will establish an economy-wide goal," said James Connaughton, the chairman of the White House's Council on Environmental Quality. "But we are not dogmatic here. If China and India want to do a series of goals that cover most of our emissions, that's acceptable."

So should the United States embark on widespread greenhouse gas reductions? Or are such policies sure-fire economy killers?

Read More

Ben likes: Mad vanities

David Warren/Ottawa Citizen

Noting the goal, “seriously” stated by the Group of Eight, to cut world CO2 emissions in half by the year 2050, a couple of techies at the Tokyo Institute of Technology sat down with their calculators, and coolly worked out what will be required to meet this goal, on an equal per capita basis, around the planet. The 88 percent is the figure for North America. The Europeans get off relatively easily: they only have to shut down 83 percent of their economy; the Japanese 85 percent.

Only 35 percent of the Chinese economy will have to go. And good news for India, much of which is still living in the Arcadian low-carbon past. The Indians get to gun their carbon emissions by 137 percent over the next four decades.

Read More

Joel likes: US officials clarify climate policy -- or do they?

Jeff Tollefson/Nature

The BBC focused on three words -- “binding international obligations” -- uttered by Daniel Price, a national security advisor to President George W. Bush. Although it remains unclear what, exactly, this means, it is perhaps telling that such statements could grab headlines around the world. The administration seems eager to clarify what it considers misunderstandings about its position on global warming (namely the general perception that it will stop at nothing to quash or at least cripple any international treaty to protect its industry friends).

The problem here is that there isn’t much new.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Most Viewed

Most Discussed

Most Emailed

Ads by Google