Topics

Miley Cyrus a.k.a. Hannah Montana
The Associated Press

The public image of Disney pop sensation Miley Cyrus could change after the June issue of Vanity Fair hits newsstands.

Featured Topic | Posted 29 weeks 3 days ago

'Hannah Montana' topless in Vanity Fair: Art or exploitation?

If "Hannah Montana" wasn't a television show directed at kids on the Disney Channel, this could be the wacky premise for an upcoming episode: The tween pop sensation goes to a photo shoot, gets talked into taking some "artistic" pictures with a famous celebrity photographer, and the next thing she knows, the country is going n

Read More

Ben likes: Miley gets Lohanned

James Poulos/The Postmodern Conservative

The innocence factor can't but plummet under conditions like these, because the beauty that makes Miley's picture possible and that makes this commentary possible is manufactured; yes, she herself has something to do with it, but hardly all and probably not most. So what we are worshipping turns out to be less Miss Cyrus' marvelous fresh fecundity and youthful radiance and more the erotic appeal of a giant confection. In an earlier era, this picture would in fact be a painting of a nameless young girl, and it would be a work of art. In this era, it's a brick in a long, high wall.

Pity. I've argued before that our problem isn't honoring the sexual power of young women, it's in aggravating that power for the purposes of dishonoring it. Miley's evocative portrait alone doesn't contribute to this problem. But the premise of the picture, and so much of what brought it into being, does. So people decry its classic pose and echo of nobility while smiling away at this getup. Tell me: which is cheaper?

It's going to take a long time to untangle the psychosexual web this culture's woven. Maybe forever.

Read More

Joel likes: The "Hannah Montana" virginity debate

Thomas Rogers/Salon

It has never been easy to be a child star, but as an article in Thursday's Globe and Mail argues, today's teen actors are facing increasing scrutiny about their sex lives. It points to the media's fascination with the romantic lives of, among others, Emma Watson of "Harry Potter" and "Heroes" actress Hayden Panettiere as evidence of our growing obsession with teen stars' virginity. The article suggests that this development came in the wake of "Olsen Twins Countdown" (the Web site dedicated to counting down to the "Full House" stars' 18th birthday) and Jamie Lynn Spears' recent pregnancy. But it may have more to do with the fallout from her older sister's early branding strategy. As the recent (jaw-dropping) Rolling Stone profile of Britney points out, in the late '90s, manager Larry Rudolph turned her supposed virginity into a key part of her marketing plan -- as the "teenage Lolita of middle-aged men's dreams."

Spears was paraded around talk shows, discussing her virginity and, as the profile suggests, laying the groundwork for her eventual collapse. Jessica Simpson developed a similar look-but-don't-touch persona, and as they reached stratospheric popularity, Spears and Simpson managed to be both wholesome and sexualized -- a dichotomy that made it acceptable for prepubescent girls to show off their stomachs, and may have set a dangerous precedent for a new generation of teen stars whose entire life, including their sex life, has, without their consent, become a part of their public persona.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Britney Spears faced involuntary commitment. Is that wrong?
The Associated Press

Was it wrong to hospitalize Britney Spears?

Featured Topic | Posted 39 weeks 3 days ago

What rights do the mentally ill have? Britney Spears, Illinois gunman put the question in focus

A Los Angeles judge orders pop star Britney Spears into psychiatric treatment. A lawyer says Spears is an adult and she's being denied her rights. A graduate student in Illinois goes off his medication and goes on a shooting spree. A judge in Virginia says a Virginia Tech student poses a danger to himself and others, but the law cannot hold him.

How society should treat its mentally ill citizens is once again at the fore of public debate. The sideshow surrounding Spears and the tragedy of Northern Illinois are two sides of the same question: Should mentally ill people be confined and treated against their will? Should states invest more in mental health programs? Should mental patients have different rights than everybody else?

Read More

Ben likes: Let's stop being nutty about the mentally ill

E. Fuller Torrey/City Journal

The emptying of our public psychiatric hospitals has been the second-largest social experiment in twentieth-century America, exceeded only by the New Deal. The experiment, undertaken upon remarkably little data and a multitude of flawed assumptions, has received virtually no formal evaluation or assessment to ascertain whether it has worked. Once the spring of deinstitutionalization was wound, it just kept going and going and going. And it continues today -- disastrously.

Read More

Joel likes: Britney Spears versus her own civil liberties

Rosalie Greenberg/Huffington Post

In many states the laws regulating commitment to a psychiatric hospital requires that the individual is at a strong, fairly imminent risk of harming himself or others or to use a more popular phrase, is "a clear and present danger" to one's self or others. Perhaps to be even more direct, there has to be a very high suspicion that not placing a person in the hospital would result in suicidal or homicidal actions in the very near future. Consistent with our core beliefs as Americans, the law protects the rights of the individual, as it should be.

In the process of preserving one's basic rights, how far can we intervene to help preserve his or her very life?

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

She makes the world go 'round?

Featured Topic | Posted 43 weeks 2 days ago

Celebrity stimulus: Is Britney Spears good for the economy?

To the casual tabloid reader, Britney Spears' life looks like a train wreck. But Britney Spears is good for the U.S. economy. Seriously.

Conde Nast's Portfolio magazine this month takes a look at the "Britney-Industrial Complex" and finds a $110 million to $120 million economy. What's troubling might be who is cashing in: paparazzi, the tabloids, lawyers and... um, websites.

Is the healthy Britney Spears economy good or bad for U.S. culture and American taste?

Read More

Ben likes: The Britney-Industrial Complex

Richard Cohen/The Washington Post

The Britney Industrial Complex illustrates the economy's need for celebrity. Vast amounts of money can be manufacturing ones who appeal particularly to the young. Spears was once one of those, although at age 26 she has leaped that demographic boundary. Still, the breadth of her drawing power cannot be fully estimated. Portfolio's concoction does not, for instance, measure her worth to the morning television shows -- "Today," etc. -- which on any given day are mere adjuncts to the fan magazines. Nor can it measure what she is worth to us as a topic of common interest for our communal water-cooler moments. Even this column has, in a sense, exploited her.

Read More

Joel likes: Media are off their game

Bill Dwyre/Los Angeles Times

Our society has a massive appetite for drama, and little for reality. We read about Britney Spears when we need to read about Afghanistan. And the media, which has the mandate -- and the constitutional right -- to lead us from this abyss, are all too often not doing so. Media, which once led public opinion, now all too often follow it.

She isn't news. She's titillation. She is a troubled young woman whom we cover with delight, rather than empathy. She is web hits, the current fool's gold of the newspaper industry.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Most Viewed

Most Discussed

Most Emailed

Ads by Google