Topics

Memorial for Matthew Shepard
The Associated Press

Stones form a cross where Matthew Shepard, a young gay man from Laramie, Wyo., was found murdered in 1999. Shepard's death sparked a national outcry for stronger hate crime laws.

Featured Topic | Posted 30 weeks 1 day ago

Should Congress broaden U.S. hate crimes laws?

Expanding federal hate crimes laws has been on the Democratic agenda for years now. On Tuesday, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., introduced legislation in a major defense policy bill to extend U.S. hate crime laws to cover gays and lesbians.

Read More

Ben likes: Hating hate

National Review

Hate crimes "are different" from other crimes: That was the argument for hate-crimes laws that Al Gore made during the 2000 campaign, and it is the argument that we are going to hear again this week, as Congress takes up federal legislation on the subject. Crimes motivated by hostility to the victim’s race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation are said to be different chiefly because they, supposedly, instill fear in entire communities and generate social division.

Even if this generalization is true -- and it is not obvious that it is -- it should not end our thought about hate. There is no evidence that adding hate-crimes laws on top of regular criminal laws does anything to deter these acts. Nor is there any evidence that federal action is needed. Most states already have hate-crimes laws; the federal government has a hate-crimes law that applies to victims who were engaged in federally protected activities, such as holding rallies.

The proposed legislation would allow the federal government to investigate and prosecute hate crimes, whether or not federally protected activities were involved, and to assist local law enforcement in fighting them. But there is no evidence that local law enforcement has a special need for federal resources to help it combat hate crimes. 

Read More

Joel likes: Standing up against hate crimes

Winnie Stachelberg/Center for American Progress

Hate crimes terrorize entire communities. When Matthew Shepard died in 1998, thousands of gay men and lesbians across the country were reminded that their sexuality made them vulnerable to horrific violence. Criminal offenses against people of color, gays, lesbians, people with disabilities, and other minority groups often target individuals, but they create insecurity and anxiety in local communities and vulnerable groups nationwide.

Gays and lesbians are increasingly in the public spotlight due to the marriage equality debate, and the number of hate crimes against them has spiked in some parts of the country. Individuals with non-traditional gender identities also continue to be targets of brutal violence nationwide. Yet federal prosecutors do not have legal authority to intervene in cases of violence based on bias toward transgender individuals at all, and law does not require the FBI to even collect statistics on such cases. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act would take a needed step to protect transgender Americans by allowing the FBI to gather statistics about the number of crimes motivated by bias against an individual’s gender identity and also to investigate and prosecute these crimes.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

John Lewis is one of several plaintiffs suing to legalize gay marriage in California.

Featured Topic | Posted 37 weeks 3 days ago

California's Supreme Court takes up gay marriage

As gay-rights groups call for marital equality and opponents warn of a public backlash, societal decay and religious conflict, the California Supreme Court is prepared for an epic three-hour hearing Tuesday on the constitutionality of the state law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman.

Should states have the right to define what marriage means? Should the issue be settled with an amendment to the U.S. Constitution? Or should gays and lesbians have the right to marry?

Read More

Ben likes: A civil debate on gay marriage

Jeff Jacoby/Boston Globe

But if it's "bigotry, pure and simple" not to want same-sex marriage to be forced on American society by a handful of crusading courts, then among the bigots must be the large congressional majority -- 85 senators, 342 representatives -- who passed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, confirming that marriage in the United States is between members of the opposite sex only and allowing states to deny recognition of same-sex marriages performed in other states. Then-President Bill Clinton must be a bigot too: He signed the bill into law.

Read More

Joel likes: Marriage has always changed with the times

Lorri L. Jean/Los Angeles Times

Is there a compelling public interest in preventing loving, committed, same-sex couples from getting legally married? The clear answer is no. Ask Canada. Ask Spain. Ask South Africa. Ask Massachusetts!

The real compelling public interest is in ending bigotry and discrimination. It's being true to our nation's values of freedom, fairness, justice and equality. We cannot and should not be able to regulate what individuals think and believe. But when it comes to what the government does, it must treat everyone equally. This includes same-sex couples and their families.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

These boys might not know it, but they're on the front line of the culture wars.

Featured Topic | Posted 39 weeks 1 day ago

Are the Boy Scouts ground zero in the culture wars?

Rick Perry is an Eagle Scout who happens to be the governor of Texas. And he doesn't like the attacks on the Boy Scouts' core beliefs from the American Civil Liberties Union and others. He's written a new book, "On My Honor: Why the American Values of the Boy Scouts Are Worth Fighting For."

Shouldn't the Boy Scouts have a First Amendment right to say who's in and who's out? Or should the Scouts get with the times and open membership to boys and men who might be gay and might not believe in God?

Read More

Ben likes: Punishing the Boy Scouts

Nat Hentoff/Jewish World Review

The majority of the Supreme Court said it was aware that "homosexuality has gained societal acceptance," but went on to say that "This is scarcely an argument for denying First Amendment protection to those who refuse to accept those views."

"We are not," the Court continued, "as we must not be, guided by our views as to whether the Boy Scouts' teachings with respect to homosexual conduct are right or wrong." The state "cannot compel the organization to accept members where such acceptance would derogate from the organization's expressive message."

I would hope that some teachers of social studies -- or American history -- in our schools will dare to explain why the Supreme Court acted as it did.

Read More

Joel likes: Scouting's merits

Jay Fernandez/Los Angeles Times

Years ago, the last time this gays-in-Scouting dust-up made it onto my radar, my brothers and I -- all three of us are Eagle Scouts -- fretted over the right expression of dissent. We considered sending back our Eagle badges, as others did, in protest. That we ultimately didn't says less about the extent of our outrage than our pride in achieving something fewer than 1% of Scouts manage. I worked hard for that -- suffered, even -- and, ashamedly in retrospect, I wasn't willing to give it up in the name of principle.

For me, the edification of Scouting came in the form of lifelong calls for strong community, an awareness of one's effect on the natural world, self-reliance and leadership skills. (Camping, however, remains just above waterboarding on my list of favorite activities.) To claim that these qualities are somehow reserved for heterosexuals, either as teachers or students, is to miss the point entirely.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. addresses a rally last year in support of repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Featured Topic | Posted 42 weeks 2 days ago

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" turns 15: Retain or repeal?

It was 15 years ago, Tuesday, that President Clinton rolled out the policy that came to be known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which relaxed the long-standing bar against gay men and women serving in the U.S. military. While the move was initially hailed as progress for the rights of gays in the military, today many see it as a liability.

About 12,000 service members have been booted from the military since the law took effect, including dozens of Arabic speakers whose skills are particularly prized by the military since the advent of the war on terror.

Read More

Ben likes: Ask, tell, enlist

Ed Morrissey/Captain's Quarters

If gays and lesbians were the cause of degraded morale and unit cohesion, then that damage would occur regardless of whether they kept quiet or not. If the Pentagon argues that the revelation causes the damage, then the problem isn't the gays or lesbians, but the bigots in the ranks that suddenly find out about them. That sounds exactly like the problem that the Pentagon had when it considered desegregating the services after World War II, and they finally rejected the option of coddling the bigots.

So should we now. Perhaps wartime makes for a difficult circumstance for a policy change, but this war will likely be generational, and we need as much support as we can muster.

Read More

Joel likes: Testifying in New York

Cholene Espinoza/Servicemembers Legal Defense Network

The American people take that phrase “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” at face value. Most believe that the policy allows a person to serve as a gay American so long as he or she does not tell anyone. Unfortunately, as we know from our SLDN client base of approximately 75 cases at any one time, men and women can be discharged because someone else “tells,” such as a mother who can’t stand the thought of her son returning to Iraq, or a jealous partner, or an intercepted innocent e-mail from an admirer back home.

And because the criterion for discharge is “credible evidence from a reliable source,” with no standard for what “credible” or “reliable” means, the policy is arbitrarily enforced at the discretion of the commander.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

A president, or a pastor?

Featured Topic | Posted 44 weeks 2 days ago

God, Mike Huckabee and the Constitution: Tearing down the "wall of separation"?

Christian values usually features prominently in Mike Huckabee's stump speech. But Huckabee got specific in Michigan on Monday night, elaborating on his belief that the constitution needs to be amended.

"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards," Huckabee said, referring to the need for a constitutional human life amendment and an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Did Huckabee cross the bounds of American political discourse?

Read More

Ben likes: Huckabee just lost the election

RC2/Wheat and Weeds

If I work really hard, I can just barely defend that remark, but jiminy, if that quotation is accurate, it's a disaster. In one sentence Mike Huckabee just:

  • ceded the ground to those who would make the Constitution into anything they want (that's what he's doing after all)...
  • and arguably called for theocracy (that's how it will play in the attack ads should he be the nominee).
Read More

Joel likes: Amending the Constitution to represent God's standards

Scout Finch/Daily Kos

Yes, he wants to amend the Constitution to reflect God's laws. American Taliban anyone? How long before adultery is punishable by stoning? And divorce? Forget about it. We should probably go ahead and cancel the NFL on Sundays too. Mike Huckabee's grand plan to save America is to save us all... one by one. The question is, are voters ready to be saved?

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Most Viewed

Most Discussed

Most Emailed

Ads by Google