Topics

The Associated Press

Time for a change?

Featured Topic | Posted 15 weeks 5 days ago

Is it time for universal health in America?

More than half of U.S. doctors now favor switching to a national health care plan and fewer than a third oppose the idea, according to a survey published on Monday.  Of more than 2,000 doctors surveyed, 59 percent said they support legislation to establish a national health insurance program, while 32 percent said they opposed it, researchers reported in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. Is it time for universal health insurance in the United States?

 

Read More

Ben likes: Five Myths of Health Care

Sally Pipes/Washington Times

Forty-seven million Americans do not have health insurance. This figure comes from the U.S. Census Bureau. What most people don't know, however, is that the Bureau counts anyone who went without health insurance during any part of the previous year as "uninsured." So if you weren't covered for just one day in 2007, you're one of the 47 million.

That also includes 10.2 million illegal immigrants, and about 14 million people who are eligible for public health-care programs like Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program but have yet to enroll. And nearly 10 million of the "uninsured" have household incomes of more than $75,000 — so they can probably afford to buy health insurance but choose not to.

Read More

Joel likes: Why 2009 is the year for universal health care

Ezra Klein/The American Prospect

In 1994, 37 million Americans were uninsured. In 2007, 47 million are. Between 1996 and 2005, an employee's spending on health premiums for his or her family has shot up 85 percent -- and incomes, of course, have not followed.

In economics, there's a famous dictum known as Stein's Law, which states that when something cannot go on forever, it will stop. Our health-care system, as currently composed, cannot go on forever. It will wreck our economy, collapse our businesses, render both private and public insurance unaffordable. And so, it will stop. Reform is not a question of if, but when and how.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Rahm Emanuel
The Associated Press

Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., wants a new "New Deal" for America.

Featured Topic | Posted 17 weeks 3 days ago

Does the New Economy need another "New Deal"?

With the financial market reeling from the collapse of investment banker Bear Stearns, public confidence in the U.S. economy continues to plummet. Three in four Americans now rate the economy as at least somewhat bad -- the highest percentage in more than 15 years -- and the same number say they think it is getting worse, according to a new CBS News poll.

Read More

Ben likes: A New Deal for a New Depression

Ordinal Granola/Americans for Tax Reform

It is safe to say Rahm Emanuel's New Deal continues in the tradition of FDR's grand central planning experiment we are staggering under today with a serious need for entitlement reform. The real question here is whether Americans are willing to give up more and more of their paychecks to fund more government interference in the market and possibly lose their jobs as US competitiveness erodes, or whether we'll find another Wendell Willkie to stand against the new New Deal and for economic growth. 

Read More

Joel likes: A New Deal for the New Economy

Rahm Emanuel/Wall Street Journal

First, we must reform the way we educate the next generation of workers to ensure that our nation stays competitive. We should require all students to receive one year of training and education after high school -- be it at a community college, technical school, or a four year university.

Second, we should ensure that all Americans have quality, affordable health care. Helping older workers and employers manage the health costs of early retirees will make it possible for entire sectors of the U.S. economy to get back on their feet.

Third, we must support the development of new, energy-efficient technologies that will make energy less expensive for consumers and businesses, help protect the environment, create millions of green-collar jobs, and make our nation energy independent.

Finally, we must become a nation of savers again with a universal savings plan.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
obama clinton
The Associated Press

Are they nearing the end?

Featured Topic | Posted 21 weeks 2 days ago

Debate wrapup: Did Clinton surrender to Obama?

The latest debate between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was underwhelming -- few fireworks, and lots of agreement on the issues. The major difference: The never-ending debate over their health care plans. The lack of debate at the debate, in fact, prompted some observers to suggest that Clinton is surrendering to Obama.

Is the end near in the Democratic race?

Read More

Ben likes: The Showdown in Texas

Jim Geraghty/The Campaign Spot

Other than the Xerox line, it was tough to find moments where Hillary really seemed to pound home an argument to Democrats, "you can't nominate this guy, you're on the verge of a catastrophic mistake." She needed to do that tonight; I'm a little surprised that she didn't try to maul him, or to provoke some sort of unflattering reaction out of him. He's so unflappable, I don't know whether it would have worked. But when you've lost 11 in a row, you have to start throwing some Hail Mary passes.

Read More

Joel likes: Clinton seemed to surrender

John Nichols/The Nation

Hillary Clinton, after what came across more like a valedictory statement than a rallying cry, turned to the man who so soundly defeated her in this week's Wisconsin primary and said, "No matter what happens… I am honored to be here with Barack Obama. I am absolutely honored."

The statement, with which she closed Thursday night's 19th Democratic presidential debate, was so heartfelt, so sincere, that Obama put one arm around his opponent's shoulder and reached a hand across the table to warmly shake her hand.

It was an oddly disarming moment that belonged to the New York senator but not in the way that she or her supporters could have wanted.

Clinton seemed to surrender, graciously.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
AP Photo
Featured Topic | Posted 27 weeks 3 days ago

U.S. leads industrialized nations in preventable deaths

Somewhere, Michael Moore is planning a sequel.
The U.S. leads the industrialized world in "preventable deaths," according to a new study.
The country might have been spared an estimated 101,000 deaths a year if preventable deaths -- infections, surgical complications, treatable cancers and more -- had matched the rates of the top-ranked countries.

Read More

Ben likes: U.S. health care and productivity -- better than you think

John R. Graham/Pacific Research Institute

American crusaders for “universal” health care — as opposed to universal choice in means of health care — emphasize America’s uniqueness in lacking this characteristic of the modern welfare state. Given the evidence of America’s productivity, perhaps it is a uniqueness we should not rush to abandon.

Read More

Joel likes: U.S. Lags Industrialized Nations In Preventable Deaths

The Gate

While the Democrats have spent much time and energy proposing sweeping reforms to increase access for the 47 million uninsured Americans, the Republicans have been warning that a move to "socialized medicine" -- which is how they characterize the government-run systems of most other industrialized nations -- would compromise the quality of care.
"I wouldn't say it (the last-place ranking) is a condemnation, because I think health care in the U.S. is pretty good if you have access," said one of the study's authors. "But if you don't, I think that's the main problem, isn't it?"

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Most Viewed

Most Discussed

Most Emailed

Ads by Google