Topics

Jeremiah Wright at the NAACP
The Associated Press

Jeremiah Wright has become the face of black liberation theology in America.

Featured Topic | Posted 30 weeks 1 day ago

Does black liberation theology matter?

An upshot of the controversy surrounding Barack Obama's ex-pastor is the new focus on black liberation theology.

Jeremiah Wright Jr. of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago is one of the foremost adherents of this theology. A man of capacious learning and ego, Wright stands condemned of late as a incendiary radical for his views that the American government may have created AIDS and that the 9/11 terror attacks were payback for the sins of U.S. foreign policy

Read More

Ben likes: The peculiar theology of black liberation

Spengler/Asia Times

In the black liberation theology taught by Wright, Cone and Hopkins, Jesus Christ is not for all men, but only for the oppressed:

In the New Testament, Jesus is not for all, but for the oppressed, the poor and unwanted of society, and against oppressors ... Either God is for black people in their fight for liberation and against the white oppressors, or he is not [Cone].

In this respect black liberation theology is identical in content to all the ethnocentric heresies that preceded it. Christianity has no use for the nations, a "drop of the bucket" and "dust on the scales", in the words of Isaiah. It requires that individuals turn their back on their ethnicity to be reborn into Israel in the spirit. That is much easier for Americans than for the citizens of other nations, for Americans have no ethnicity. But the tribes of the world do not want to abandon their Gentile nature and as individuals join the New Israel. Instead they demand eternal life in their own Gentile flesh, that is, to be the "Chosen People."

That is the "biblical scholarship" to which Obama referred in his March 14 defense of Wright and his academic prominence.

Read More

Joel likes: Project Trinity

Kelefa Sanneh/New Yorker

“Christianity is the white man’s religion.” That was Malcolm X’s verdict, and though he meant it to be final, a generation of black Christian leaders decided to treat it as provisional. In 1969, a thirty-one-year-old theologian named James H. Cone published “Black Theology & Black Power,” a short, astringent book that Wright would use as a blueprint for Trinity. Cone proposed a reciprocal arrangement: just as the Black Power movement could find redemption in the Church, so the Church -- dominated and distorted by generations of white men -- could find redemption in the Black Power movement. He wrote that there was “a need for a theology whose sole purpose is to emancipate the gospel from its ‘whiteness’ so that blacks may be capable of making an honest self-affirmation through Jesus Christ.” And he argued that, since African-American suffering was such a powerful metaphor for the suffering of Christ, color-blind Christianity was a contradiction in terms. “To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen,” he wrote. “God has chosen black people!”

Like many brash-sounding manifestos of the era, this one came with fine-print qualifications. Throughout the book, Cone was careful to explain that a black-centered Church need not be a black-separatist Church. And even the simplest phrases -- “black people,” for instance -- turned out to be slippery. It wasn’t about being “physically black,” he wrote. “To be black means that your heart, your soul, your mind, and your body are where the dispossessed are.” In his view, blackness was as radically inclusive as Christianity itself, and just as demanding.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Barack Obama
The Associated Press

Barack Obama faces the press and denounces his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

Featured Topic | Posted 30 weeks 6 days ago

Obama rejects and denounces Wright. Is it too late to matter?

Barack Obama probably thought that Jeremiah Wright would try to fade from the scene. Instead, Obama's former pastor spent recent days making increasingly strident racial remarks in increasingly public venues. And so, on Tuesday afternoon, Obama did what he had to do to contain the damage: He repudiated Wright.

Read More

Ben likes: The dangers of symbolic thinking

Jonah Goldberg/National Review Online

It seems one reason both Wright and Obama are in this mess is they share a way of thinking about themselves and their respective projects. Obama expressly said that Wright represents the "black community." Wright says an attack on him is an attack on the "black Church." Obama often suggests that a vote for him is a vote for "change" and for moving beyond division and discord and all bad things. And while he's wisely refrained from expressly saying that his skin color is the medium of exchange for this grand world-historical purchase, that's certainly been the subtext for him and the plain text for many of his supporters.

The problem with this sort of thing is that people aren't abstractions, they cannot in fact "personify" anything, not really.

Read More

Joel likes: Obama's response to Wright

James Mitchell/Dallas Morning News

I thought Obama handled the latest Wright flap admirably. He put distance between himself and Wright. Now the big question. Does this make any difference to Obama's crtiics?

Frankly, I expect new themes of criticism. One started on Fox last night when one commentator suggested Obama orchestrated the latest flap, presumably so he could respond. Another trumped up theme will be that Obama wasn't angry enough and didn't go far enough --- whatever that means. Expect calls for him to leave the church where Wright no longer is pastor. And if he does that, look for the bar to move one more time to ask him to do somethng else.

By all accounts, the press conference, like Obama's race speech a month earlier, reflected Obama. Strategists would never have advised the race speech and might have advised more outward anger toward Wright. What we got from Obama is what we've seen this entire campaign... a measured speaker who gets his point across without arrogance. That's poise, not weakness.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Jeremiah Wright at the National Press Club on April 28
The Associated Press

"Divisive" or "descriptive"? Jeremiah Wright talks to reporters at the National Press Club.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 19 hours ago

The Wright stuff? Obama's ex-pastor goes on tour

Barack Obama's former pastor is making the rounds... and stirring up more controversy for the Democratic presidential candidate. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright said Monday that he will try to change national policy by “coming after” Obama if he is elected president.

Read More

Ben likes: It's a black thing

Henry Payne/National Review Online

Wright ended on a note straight from the 1960s: “I believe a change is coming.”

But is it the same kind of change Barack Obama promises? They may share the same economic populism that blesses marching on the picket line, but Wright’s views on race don't seem to have much in common with Obama's public statements to date. Wright’s separatist message is hardly post-racial, while many have acclaimed Obama as embodying that unifying ideal. Obama said in his Philadelphia speech on race that “the profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is... that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made.”

In that March 18 speech, Obama expressed the conviction that he represents a new generation of post-grievance black leadership, ready to take on the challenges that confront blacks in places like Detroit today: Crime and family disintegration.

But his good friend and pastor of 20 years is a symbol of how much of the black establishment still revels in old-school demagoguery.  

Read More

Joel likes: The "angry black man" test

Eric Deegans/The Feed

We knew there would come a moment when the first black man with a realistic shot at becoming president would have to reconcile black anger and frustration with white fear and resentment. It's a critical test: acknowledging the righteous anger of people frustrated by continuing racial inequality without looking like the kind of Angry Black Man often rejected by more conservative white voters.

Who knew that the race-based bullet wounding Obama's campaign would come from friendly fire -- his spiritual mentor Jeremiah Wright -- adding yet another unpredictable twist to the most unconventional electoral contest in history?

I've already pointed out how the initial stories about Rev. Jeremiah Wright's sermons have distorted many of his points. So I'm not saying he shouldn't feel compelled to defend his church and his reputation by facing down the media he way he has by speaking to PBS' Bill Moyers, speaking to the Detroit NAACP Sunday and speaking to the National Press Club in Washington D.C. as I write this.

But Wright's recent appearances will continue to hurt the candidate, because the reverend is the radical Obama never was, and he's close enough to give skeptical white voters an excuse.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
John McCain
The Associated Press

Is he alienating his own party?

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Why won't McCain use Wright against Obama?

After he wrapped up the GOP nomination, the conventional wisdom was that Sen. John McCain would have to work hard to persuade doubting conservatives to support him in the general election. Instead, he is loudly condemning North Carolina Republicans for airing an advertisement that criticizes Barack Obama's association with the Rev.

Read More

Ben likes: Absurdity

Andrew McCarthy/The Corner

During a blogger conference call last week, Jen Rubin of Commentary's excellent Contentions blog, asked Sen. McCain about Hamas's endorsement of Sen. Obama for the presidency. Did McCain get indignant? Did he spew that an insinuation that Obama might be popular with Islamic terrorists would be "out of touch with reality in the Republican Party"? Not exactly.

He said: "All I can tell you Jennifer is that I think it's very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States. So apparently has Danny Ortega and several others. I think that people should understand that I will be Hamas's worst nightmare.... If senator Obama is favored by Hamas I think people can make judgments accordingly."

The Hamas endorsement of Obama, while understandable, was unsolicited; Wright, on the other hand, is someone with whom Obama was tight for two decades and who Obama chose to incorporate in his campaign as an advisor. Why does McCain figure the former is fit for criticism but focus on the latter is an occasion for smug condemnation of conservatives.

Read More

Joel likes: Helping Hillary

Jason Zengerle/The Plank

What they didn't mention at all is that the North Carolina GOP ad is intended to help Hillary in the May 6 primary. I mean, if the NC GOP really wanted the ad to help McCain, wouldn't they be running this ad in October or November? This is clearly an attempt to play the race and the Wright card against Obama in the hopes of hurting him in the Democratic Primary. Which suggests that there are at least some Republicans out there who still think Obama is the more formidable general election candidate.

Now, granted, there's nothing Hillary can really do to stop the NC GOP from doing this. If the state party isn't going to abide by McCain and the RNC's demands that they take down the ad, they sure as hell aren't going to listen to Hillary. But it's pretty clear that she's the one who stands to benefit most from this ad.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Barack Obama
The Associated Press

Barack Obama and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Featured Topic | Posted 35 weeks 6 days ago

Why is religion such a touchy subject in the presidential campaign?

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's involvement with a fiery preacher is only the latest in an unusual number of religious controversies so far in the 2008 race for the White House.

Read More

Ben likes: Obama, a faithful Democrat

Joseph M. Knippenberg/Ashbrook Center

Obama professes to be concerned that the contact between church and state can impinge upon religious freedom. As he says, "One of the things that I think churches have to be mindful of is that if the federal government starts paying the piper, then they get to call the tune." In itself, this isn’t an unreasonable concern. But in the context of Obama’s conception of the political role of churches and prophetic witness, it doesn’t ring altogether true. Churches that have as significant a role in political advocacy as he ascribes to them are going to be sorely tempted to conform to the world for the sake of influence in it.

That Obama apparently isn’t troubled by this may be a product of his rather worldly conception of the role of religion in our social and political order. For him, religion is principally a source of reformist energy, to be checked in its excesses by a rationalist, non-majoritarian judiciary. The reformist energy that supports and promotes the agenda of the Democratic Party is to be welcomed and harnessed. Those who have other ideas in mind can be treated with a disarming respect, as conversation partners who can be persuaded but won’t be permitted to persuade. Or they can be criticized and resisted as irrational, divisive, and unconstitutional, not to say hypocritical and un-Godly.

They do worship an awesome God in the blue states. And He unfailingly votes Democratic.

 

Read More

Joel likes: Democrats and religion

Kevin Drum/Washington Monthly

Two Democrats, two committed Christians. So what's it gotten them? In the case of Hillary Clinton it's gotten her Barbara Ehrenreich, who used Hillary's religious ties a couple of days ago in the Huffington Post as a launching pad for an unusually ugly character assassination. And Obama? Well, we all know how that story turned out.

If this is what being a sincerely committed Christian gets you in the Democratic Party, why should we bother? Are the benefits really worth the costs? There must be more than a few Democrats surveying the rubble of the past week and thinking that maybe we'd be better off leaving the God talk to the Republicans and keeping our own faith private.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google