Topics

Dick Cheney* will shoot your face
Texas Monthly magazine

Dick Cheney is often caricatured, and often in court defending the prerogatives of his office.

Featured Topic | Posted 30 weeks 5 days ago

Is Dick Cheney beyond the Constitution? Or just beyond Congress?

Vice President Dick Cheney has had a knack for stirring up constitutional controversy. Cheney asserted executive privilege and he's also argued that the vice president's office is outside the executive branch.

Read More

Ben likes: The executive's privilege

National Review

Typically, disputes like those over the U.S. attorney and terrorist-surveillance program are worked out by compromise. If a president wants to protect his prerogatives, he also wants to preserve a working relationship with Congress. But this particular relationship can’t be saved. Comity is impossible with a Congress bent on doing all it can to destroy what remains of the Bush administration. In the matter of the U.S. attorneys, the administration has provided Congress 8,500 pages of documents and numerous officials and former officials have testified. This isn’t enough for a Congress that won’t stop until it has run-down every outlandish conspiracy theory about the firings that -- even if clumsy and ill-advised -- were perfectly within Bush’s power to make.

And so, the administration was justified in saying both, "no more," and "see you in court." There, it can hope to get a decision that strengthens the executive’s ability to protect its deliberations for a long time to come.

Read More

Joel likes: Cheney and the Constitution

Aziz Huq/The Nation

For Cheney to be pushing the envelope on executive power is especially ironic, given the original constitutional status of the vice presidency: That office is a vestigial afterthought tacked on to the Constitution toward the end of the 1787 Constitutional Convention to solve a gaggle of unrelated problems. And it quickly proved more trouble than it was worth.

The vice presidency, in short, was never intended as an independent center of constitutional power--let alone home of a shadow EPA (the rather wonderfully named White House Council on Environmental Quality); the secret architect of national energy policy; and the shameful global detention and torture policies--including the wretched military commission system.

Perhaps we do need to start thinking about why perhaps the most powerful office in the country is not on the top of a ballot, and why its powers are not defined -- or circumscribed -- by any law or constitutional provision.  It's long past time for Congress to take this on. Past legislation has further provided clear channels of responsibility, particularly on military matters. It would be a good debate to have before the 2008 election, when Cheney will start opening the envelopes.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Cheney Abbas
The Associated Press

Vice President Dick Cheney and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Featured Topic | Posted 36 weeks 1 day ago

Cheney: Palestinian state 'long overdue'

Vice President Dick Cheney on Sunday said that a Palestinian state is "long overdue" -- but also delayed by continuing terror attacks on Israel. But the two sides have been at war for generations. Is a Palestinian state possible? And would it bring peace to the Middle East?

Read More

Ben likes: Negotiating without benefit

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr./New York Sun

A recent book, "The Global War on Terrorism: An Assessment," by Robert Martinage of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, illuminates the problem that Israel faces with Hamas and that the West faces with Islamic terror in general.

Mr. Martinage says, "Since the death of Muhammad in 632, Islamic history has been punctuated by many periods in which various heterodox sects have emerged and clashed violently with mainstream Muslims, as well as with the West." We are living through one of those periods. Whether Israel existed or not, these Islamic terrorists would be with us still.

All that Israel and the West can do is resist the terrorists, the best way being to go on the offensive. Withdrawing from Gaza certainly has not weakened the terrorists. It has made them and their Palestinian sympathizers more eager for violence. There is one sentiment, however, in this poll that I for one agree on. Negotiations have been of no benefit, at least not to those who want peace.

Read More

Joel likes: Alternatives to Palestine

Matt Yglesias/The Atlantic

What makes the Palestinians so special that they deserve their own country when the Catalans and the Québécois and all the rest don't have them? The answer is pretty simple -- the alternative to independence is citizenship. The Québécois don't have an independent country, but they are citizens of Canada. Catalans are citizens of spain. Flemish and Walloons are both citizens of Belgium. Komi are citizens of Russia. When you see legal discriminatory treatment against citizens -- as with African-Americans in the United States until very recently -- that's a problem. People are owed equal citizenship.

It's clear, though, that granting Israeli citizenship on terms of equality to residents of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is incompatible with the idea of Israel as a Jewish state. Thus, Palestinian independence emerges as a reasonable, practical, and moral alternative.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google