Topics

ABC anchorman Charlie Gibson with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia
The Associated Press

ABC News anchorman Charles Gibson, center, is taking heat for the conduct of the Democratic debate in Philadelphia.

Featured Topic | Posted 37 weeks 5 days ago

Philadelphia fallout: Was ABC unfair to the Democrats?

The day after Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama met onstage in Philadelphia, the chatter is not so much about what the candidates said but how they were treated by debate moderators Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Critics say ABC's anchors were unfair to Clinton and Obama, focusing more on campaign gaffes than actual issues.

Read More

Ben likes: Philly face-off

Stephen Spruiell/ National Review Online

The question of electability in the general election is the only one that matters anymore in the race for the Democratic nomination, and ABC’s moderators did a good job because they kept that in mind. Gibson and Stephanopolous asked questions about the candidates’ personal associations and the controversies surrounding some of their public positions (such as Obama’s decision to stop wearing a flag lapel pin). When the questions did focus on substantial matters, they concerned things like the right to bear arms, affirmative action, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, and the capital-gains tax.

Blogger Andrew Sullivan’s reaction was typical of many -- he called it “one of the worst media performances I can remember -- petty, shallow, process-obsessed, trivial where substantive, and utterly divorced from the actual issues that Americans want to talk about.” By those, he meant things like “the environment... interrogation [of terror suspects]... [and] healthcare.” But ABC’s debate was a success because it steered clear of issues like these, i.e. issues on which the candidates mostly agree. How many times have we heard Clinton and Obama argue endlessly over what amounts to a very minor difference in their health-care plans?  

Read More

Joel likes: The unbearable lightness of George Stephanopoulos

Blake Hounshell/Foreign Policy

Has there ever been a debate moderator as puerile, as relentlessly focused on trivia, as dogged in his pursuit of the "gotcha" moment as George Stephanopoulos? I sincerely doubt it.

Aided and abetted by comoderator Charlie Gibson, the host of This Week chewed up nearly an hour of clock time probing, poking, and prodding the Democratic candidates on such nano-topics as "Bittergate," the tired Reverend Wright fracas, why they won't commit to a hypothetical joint ticket, and on and on -- long before the first substantive question, on Iraq. (Of course, it was asked by one Mandy Garber of Pittsburgh, not by either of the moderators.)

Not until 9:04 p.m. ET was there a question about the economy. Something is very wrong with the priorities of the U.S. television media.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
San Francisco gay marriage
The Associated Press

Culture wars over? Not in California.

Featured Topic | Posted 43 weeks 3 days ago

Are the culture wars over?

The 2008 presidential election, argues columnist E.J. Dionne, will be about "secular problems related to war and peace, economics and the United States' standing in the world -- not old hot-button issues such as abortion and homosexuality.

Read More

Ben likes: Value voters

Steve Sailer/The American Conservative

The culture wars between Red and Blue States are driven in large part by these objective differences in how family-friendly they are, financially speaking. For example the liberal San Francisco-Oakland area is twice as expensive as the conservative Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. The BestPlaces.net calculator reports, “To maintain the same standard of living, your salary of $100,000 in San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, California could decrease to $49,708 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas.”

Affordable family formation won’t predict who will win this November. But it offers profound implications for long-range political strategies. For example, the late housing bubble, over which Republicans George W. Bush and Alan Greenspan complacently presided, reduced the affordability of family formation, which should help the Democrats in the long run.

Read More

Joel likes: Who would Jesus vote for?

Bob Moser/The Nation

Just four years ago, when unprecedented turnout by born-again "values voters" was credited with ensuring George W. Bush's re-election, the political face of evangelicalism was Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, screeching red-faced to football-sized crowds about gay marriage as "the Waterloo," "Gettysburg" and a force that "will destroy the earth."

Now the Moral Majority generation of Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and Phyllis Schlafly, the folks who fired up politically apathetic born-again Christians in the 1970s by declaring war on public schools, abortion rights, gay rights and "liberalism," has lost its grip on the movement--partly by refusing to expand their agendas to suit a rising generation of younger evangelicals who care more about global warming than winning elections for corporate Republicans, more about combating poverty than denouncing homosexuality. With one-quarter of Americans identifying themselves as evangelicals--about 4 percent more than those who say they're mainline Protestants--the political stakes could hardly be higher. But the political upshot could hardly be murkier.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote