McCain and Obama on health care and energy
Posted 6 weeks 13 hours ago byHealth care and its rising costs, and declining availability, have become issues, and on this score McCain’s proposals are superior to Obama’s. Between government domination of the market through Medicare, Medical and other publicly funded programs, and tax-free employer-based plans, Americans have less and less say over the cost of their health care. Instead of budgeting for routine visits to the doctor, just as we do with food, clothing, gasoline and other household costs, and purchasing health insurance, as we do for our homes and our vehicles, for catastrophic expenses, we refer all our medical costs to the government or to private insurers. Is it any wonder that costs have skyrocketed? That both public and private plans have sought to cut costs?
When asked Tuesday night if medical care was a responsibility, a right or an entitlement, McCain chose the first and Obama chose the second. These differences are telling. Knowing the advantage of being in a preferred group, as a recipient of government care or tax-free employer care, has over being in business for yourself or being unemployed, McCain proposes that every citizen, and not just employers, be given a $5000 a year refundable credit so that they can get the best deal they can. Not only that, they would be free to buy health insurance anywhere, not just in their own state, as the situation is now.
Obama, on the other hand, wants to make a problematic situation even worse by instituting a government benefit for all who desire it. This would crowd out the private market for health insurance, just as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have done for housing loans, making the profitability of private plans highly dubious. Obama tries to play down this inevitable consequence by insisting that people would still be free to purchase private plans. Ask Canadians if they have that freedom under socialized medicine. And he adds that those who keep their employer-based plans will be taxed more. What he doesn’t tell you is that employers will be able to pay their employees more in lieu of health-care coverage, but employees will pay more taxes only because they are unjustly penalized for making more money!
Although McCain has been sidetracked by "environmental" concerns in regards to oil drilling and alleged global warming, he has long endorsed the full range of affordable and practical alternatives to dependence on foreign oil. More recently, he has endorsed drilling off our coastlines so long as affected states concur. He knows that the most eligible alternative for power is nuclear energy, which even environmental "greens" admit is safe and clean. He wants to stop the flow of oil money to despotic regimes that aid and abet terrorist groups abroad who threaten us and our allies, and everybody else. He supports research and development but not wholesale subsidies to as-yet unproven technology. But Obama is famous for advocating pitifully small conservation measures such as keeping up air pressure in our tires and driving at slower speeds. He makes rhetorical gestures toward oil and nuclear development, but does not commit himself to it.
This is as good a place as any to take on the bugaboo of the greedy oil companies, which even McCain feels compelled to harp on. In the first place, they buy most of their oil from overseas, spend gigantic sums for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, attempt to make a profit for their shareholders and supply gasoline at the lowest possible price. Media reports of "huge" profits never mention the much greater costs incurred, nor the necessity to obtain the means for securing more oil in the future. It makes literally no sense to believe that oil companies deliberately jack up prices and thereby infuriate their customers. They are dependent largely on their foreign suppliers, inasmuch as Congress has forbidden offshore drilling for 30 years. There is no more public, recurring and palpable cost than the per gallon price of gasoline. We had it good for so many years we thought it could go on forever. Now the only sensible thing to do is drill for more, the sooner the better.













Thoughts
WOW
Submitted on October 11th, 2008 by TreeTopFlyerAnon actually had the gaul to use the IRS and Social Security as proof of government accomplishments.
The IRS makes the DMV look like a model of efficiency and Social Security was a temperary fix that was never meant to last this long and was unsustainable at its inception.
The National Park Service cuts off access to locations that are supposed to be for the enjoyment of the people all in the name of protecting them. Does it do any good to protect our natural resources by not letting anyone enjoy them? And get charged out the wazoo for the privelage?!
You, anon, are terribly misguided. It sounds like you would prefer the old Soviet Union...you should ask someone from there how efficient it was.
PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING --NO WAY !!
Submitted on October 10th, 2008 by AnonymousThe Social Security System's dept runs perfectly well and are so efficient they haven't missed a check in 70 years. "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter if you rip off the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for them and don't report that borrowing.
The IRS is another dept that is quite efficient. Some of the laws are unfair but it has nothing to do with the operation itself.
The Nat'l Park System is great--and underfunded. Mention anything---and it will run efficiently if it isn't shorted on money for war and other PORK.
I don't want private companies to run everything ---look what these corporate pigs did to this country. Sent jobs out of the country---CEO's paid obsene amts.
wrong in so many ways
Submitted on October 10th, 2008 by TreeTopFlyerHillary and Edwards had totally impossible pipe dreams that sounded good to people who refused to think much about the consequences...just like Obama and McCain.
Health care is a not a right, entitlement or responsability. Health care is a part of your life like breathing. You have to care for your health but how you do that is up to you.
When thinking about the government subsidized plans from everyone including McCain, think about all the stuff the government has gotten involved in that ended up better than they were in the private sector.
NOTHING!
Helping the poor get ahead in life - look at church results vs. welfare.
Substance abuse - faith groups vs government programs.
National parks/forrests vs. private use lands - you can actually use the private lands.
THE Department of Motor Vehicles for God's sake - a model of efficiency.
The list is limitless. The government screws up everything it touches. Results decrease drasticly, costs increase exponentially and satisfaction plummits.
Schools - private schools are more cost effective (based on cost per student) and many times better.
I, myself, would rather have good doctors working on me - and the government will destroy that.
NEITHER CANDIDATE HAS A GOOD PLAN
Submitted on October 10th, 2008 by janmbObama's plan doesn't cover EVERYONE so its just back to SQUARE ONE where we are at today.
Does McCain even know that the people who are uninsured most likely do not even PAY $5000 in Federal Tax ??
How will that help them. It seems the $5000 tax credit would help those who pull in a good salary and can most afford the insurance anyway. When you have a GOOD PAYING JOB or a JOB period-- and your income exceeds that of inflation all the time--- which Americans for the most part DO NOT --then you can take responsibility for retirement --healthcare and all these types of expenses. !!! DUH !!!
I don't think republicans THINK and put the cart before the horse all the time. Income determines what citizens can pay for.
Hillary & John Edwards had the best plans. But the public only cares after the fact and its too late when they elect the wrong people and they will be doing it AGAIN this time.