redblueamerica.com

Although I watched the debate. I saw nothing inspiring from either candidate. I saw Obama lack luster on the economy and could not even list important parts of his wide plan that could conflict with the Bailout. Which means that Obama is talking about lofty ideals and not about specifics.

McCain did no better. On real foreign Affairs, McCain did better but slightly and could have buried Obama but he dropped the ball. Simply put, based on the information in 2002 -2003 no matter how bad that information was or incorrect that information was, it led to a correct judgement to invade Iraq to the protection of the US when Saddom threatened to use and give his WMD to Terrorists.

That is what led to the US pulling the trigger and why that trigger was more of a hair trigger so soon after 9/11.  But McCain dropped the ball and could have made the statement based on the information at the time was the right choice then argue later about how to prevent bad intelligence through proper leadership!

Then I came across an email which came early this morning. It was about Obama and his lawsuit about him not qualified to be president.

What Amazed me about the e-mail was that it contained a statement from Obama and his campaign.

The statement is:

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

As you can see, this is major news! Obama does not meet the basic requirements of POTUS! He can not and should not be president!

Obama finally admits that he had dual Kenyan Citizenship with the USA through the Birtish mandate of Kenya in 1948.  Under Article II, that precludes Obama from having the right to the presidency because of dual loyalties and how this is applied under the Blackstone comments and how a few Supreme court rulings have fallen about this topic. It also now opens up a whole new batch of regs under the Immigration and naturalization Acts.

Specifically:

Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:

1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA); 2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA); 3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA); 4. accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA); 5. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (sec. 349 (a) (5) INA); 6. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA); 7. conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).  

Also, a person who is automatically granted another citizenship does not risk losing U.S. citizenship. However, a person who acquires a foreign citizenship by applying for it may lose U.S. citizenship. In order to lose U.S. citizenship, the law requires that the person must apply for the foreign citizenship voluntarily, by free choice, and with the intention to give up U.S. citizenship. The loss of the citizenship by children are subject through renaturalization through applying with the proper US consolars office and providing evidence of having a right to US citizenship and taking the Oath of US citizenship upon their 18th birthday. Failure to excercise this action could lead to deportation if the person refuses to surrender the citizenship of the other country.

Intent can be shown by the person’s statements or conduct. The U.S. Government recognizes that dual nationality exists but does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause.

Obama was adopted in Indonesia! Court papers from Indonesia list Obama as Barry Soeroto as a citizen of Indonesia by his own Mother. Thus Obama lost his US citizenship through Adoption.

Obama came to live with his US grandparents after the death of his mother. However, Obama was required by US law under  Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481) upon his 18th birthday to naturalize back into the US to properly regain his citizenship. Even if Obama did all the right things, he would be a naturalized citizen not a natural or native born under the law!

Secondly, under Article II Obama has not dual citizenship issues but Tricitizenship issues which fall under dual loyalties definition which by law, precludes Obama from being president because Obama early life which he had no control prevents him from achieving POTUS basic standard. Just as other citizens of the US like the well known California Gov. A Schwarzenegger who had no control over his childhood had to request to be a US citizen when he came to the US to get naturalized because he held a citizenship from another country. It does not matter under the INS laws if you were born in the US or not if you surrendered the US citizenship.  Although it does not prevent you from being a US citizen, it changes the status of your citizenship from that of native born to naturalization.

Obama should be removed from the presidential race immediately!  Then he should be thrown into Jail for all the felonies he has committed over the years.