Favre-r and Favre-r

While I have enjoyed Brett Favre play over the years, I was satisfied with his career and retirement announcement early this year. Apparently, he hadn't had enough football and wanted to return as the Green Bay Packers quarterback for a 17th season. The Packers organization had made other plans and moved on. Just in case you hadn't heard the background on this real-life soap opera for football fans.

What bugs me about this situation is that Favre wanted to come back as if nothing happened. In other words, he seemed to think he is entitled to the QB position. I realize he holds NFL records in passing. In fact, I watched him do it, but come on, He RETIRED. No mas, finito

Like Senator Obama and other political types, does he reserve the right to change his position whenever he wants and expect the rest of the world to accomodate? Do the football Messiah and the political Messiah share some similar thinking?

I would like to think that words mean things and I often take people at their word. Not trying to be naive, just respectful. By giving people the benefit of the doubt, I am assuming they are acting in good faith with integrity unless they prove otherwise. Is our culture getting Favre-r and Favre-r from that concept?

 

 

 

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google