redblueamerica.com

Just think he may learn something, but I doubt it. If you had a chance to listen to the ABC report and interview Terry Moran did with obama I think you would agree he did not learn anything. So sad to bad lets all hope he does not win the Grand Prize the big chair in the whitehouse.

Obama should be doing more listening than speaking policies and acting as if he is our newly elected dumbass.

I don't have to remind everyone we have two MEN who are campaigning for the presidency who will set women's issues back to the 1920's .

Obama now has joined up with McCain in support of Bush's faith-based theocratic subsidies.

For only one example, the Bush administration proposed a new regulation last Tuesday that would discourage doctors and health-care clinics from providing birth control to women who need it and be denied Federal aid if they do.

You raise some very good questions that left me questioning the question which is always good for morning brain stimulation.

1. Obama 'appearing' narcissistic.

Obama is proposing foreign policies and at this moment, it is his first time in Afghanistan. Unless you have travelled extensively to the mideast and have seen first hand what is transpiring, you really don't have any business saying anything until your trip and data is completed. I find it very premature, immature and narcissistic for him to think he knows a rats ass about what is going on there enough to talk about it in regards to his presumptive presidency.

2. Obama and travelling overseas.

He is our latest American Political Idol. This is how it works. You take the puppet, give it a make over (and the puppets wife,) tell it how to dance and sing on stage to dazzle the American People so they will all vote for you. Make him all shiny and new, squeaky clean and oiled up so all the crap he dishes out falls off at the waist side. The only difference here is, he has a top hat (the media) and cane (the Democratic Party) along with his act. He is brilliant at selling the sizzle as they say in radio.

If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit. Now, which do you feel it is with Obama?

looks like it will be at the Victory Column instead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Vict...

No yet to be even fully affirmed candidate for president should be campaigning in such a grand posturing fashion on the world stage. It is bad enough that he would even be making addresses directly to Germans. This is the same campaign that has been greatly fearful of honest direct debates before the American people. Let him get past the outrageously pompous crowning moment of accepting the nomination of his usurped party amid 80,000 screaming American lunatics first. Let him actually win at the November polls and actually get sworn into office first and then let him pull the troops out of Iraq second.

Let him actually accomplish something significant for the American people prior to fashioning foreign policy and dictating to NATO and Europe what they must and must not do.

So far as the narcissism goes (I don't see it mentioned in this thread), Ike, I can only reply that if you are blind to it still then you will remain so. Creating and manipulating backdrops has indeed been a forte of this candidate's campaign methodology, but let's keep it onshore for now.

No one outside his campaign has forbidden the junior presumptive candidate from making a big spectacle there. Also, his own campaign has both floated the crazy notion as well as stopped it. There seems to be a consistency to that modus operandi throughout a campaign that is so narcissistic and greedy in its demands for constant heightened attention. Personally, I am very sick of it.

But who am I to care how I feel about what the flying mouthpiece says or where it goes to say it? As you well know we are but witnesses to all of these historical events, so why pretend otherwise. How can I complain about the presumptive arrogance ushering forth in torrents from an empty suit? No, the suit is empty no longer, and I doubt it ever was. It was a nice catchy phrase though, wasn't it? Today, in the spirit of change, I prefer the image 'flying mouthpiece'. (ps: 'flying' is a gerund form euphemism for a common f-word).

But first, the entourage must pay obeisance to Israel to show the love and powerful commitment to whatever the cause really is. Would he dare offer prayer at The Wailing Wall in the divided city? "Mr Olmert, tear down this wall!" Do you recall the day after finally clinching the bogus primary how the very next morning both the flying mouthpiece and Hillary Snipergate were delivering back to back addresses to AIPAC? Well, I witnessed both psychedelic events in shock and awe. So yes I suppose the entourage may touch down briefly in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, but so what? The die has been cast in both places. Only the end results have yet to be witnessed through the lens of time and media. The real arrogance should it occur on this fuel saving junket will be if he chooses to flying-mouthpiece a major address at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. The flying mouthpiece has not earned the right, and if he does so I will be praying to witness his mortal destruction.
---

I find it strange that the false one should be laying the groundwork for increased military entrapment in Afghanistan and Pakistan after all of his previous statements that the military is exhausted and the cost of the war(s) killing the American economy as well as our foreign goodwill. This would be coming from one who does not even believe in the war on terror. The only war on terror he believes in is the continued war of terror being waged against America. But then I did say that he was the false one, so why should I consider it strange at all?
---

Obama says Afghanistan 'a war that we have to win'
http://www.instablogs.com/entry/obama-sa...
Exactly why?
---

Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski,
President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
"According to this 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the CIA's intervention in Afghanistan preceded the 1979 Soviet invasion. This decision of the Carter Administration in 1979 to intervene and destabilize Afghanistan is the root cause of Afghanistan's destruction as a nation."
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BR...
As you hopefully know by now, Zbigniew is Obama's main mouth filler. He has a tortuously long involvement in clandestine World affairs. The next things I recall are Olympic boycott of Moscow Games, failed 'rescue' missions in Iran, etc ... and another completely destroyed presidency. Brzezinski is absolute poison for an Obama administration, as Wolfowitz was for Bush.
---

Far be it from me to insinuate that it has anything at all to do with anything so benign and uncontested as the small business of opiates.
http://www.interpol.int/public/Drugs/her...
---

Or that the war on terror that flying mouthpiece is now actively promoting is viewed by others as:
US “War on Terror” Destabilizing Afghanistan, Pakistan
http://www.defence.pk/forums/war-terror/...
---

Benjamin Franklin: "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."

"When the U.S. demanded that Osama bin Laden be handed over, the Taliban agreed to turn him over to an international tribunal upon seeing evidence of his guilt. But the U.S. had no such evidence. Instead, they invaded."

"According to Afghani MP Malalai Joya, one of a handful of Afghan women legislators, Karzai has also "appointed 13 former commanders with links to drug smuggling, organized crime and illegal militias to senior positions in the police force."

http://thetyee.ca/Views/2006/10/03/Afgha...

---

I don't know Skye that I see the flying mouthpiece's batteries as being completely clueless at all. No, I think it is far worse than that.