Tatiana's 17% weight loss in SF captivity
Posted 8 weeks 4 days ago byTwo years prior to being transferred to the too little Big House from Denver to San Francisco, Tatiana, a beautiful and rare Siberian tiger aged 2 1/2 years, was weighing in consistently between 292 and 299 pounds. Prior to being gunned down during a frenzied escape in which she fatally assaulted a 17 year old, the more adult Tatiana had weighed in at 242 pounds, that is a loss of 50 pounds (about 17% of weight) for a maturing animal in the course of two years!
At the time of leaving Denver, Tatiana was described by her keeper as “Even-tempered animal, socialized, transfers easily, adaptable.” After the transfer, Tatiana's diet:
"was dropped from six pounds a day, seven days a week. The Denver Zoo says she was in good shape, and that there was no indication she was over-weight when she was sent to her new home. But upon her arrival in San Francisco, zoo records show she was fed less, 36 pounds a week: six pounds six days a week, with the seventh day a "fast day" that is not uncommon in big cat zoo diets. Her weight records show Tatiana lost 20 pounds in her first month in San Francisco."
I haven't yet found if Tatiana had been fed on the fateful day, or if it was a "fast" day.
A year before, Tatiana had mauled a feeder between the bars causing serious injury. Her rations were increased briefly and then again reduced.
To me, the whole travesty reeks of abuse, cruelty, ignorance, and arrogance on the part of the culprits of the animal zoo at San Francisco, the sanctuary city. I only hope that The City is forced to pay out the nose for this. Read the article, view the video, and comment if you like. Thanks
"Frantic for Food" - Was Attack Tiger Underfed?
http://www.kcbs.com/-Frantic-for-Food---...
It makes me want to know more about the zoo. How do you feel about zoos in general? I have usually liked them, but have sensed some animals are treated way beneath the dignity they deserve, especially elephants, large cats, and large lonely primates. Am I being wussie?













Thoughts
COUNT ME IN
Submitted on June 30th, 2008 by Skye RiversNew Name...
Skye Wussie Rivers............
Attention wussie
Submitted on June 30th, 2008 by rom12921Nothing wrong with wanting humane treatment of animals. If that makes you a "wussie" then so am I.
I'm cranky when I'm hungry.
Zoo's do help educate the
Submitted on June 30th, 2008 by janmbZoo's do help educate the public by being able to view these animals they shall never come in contact with otherwise and see how magnificent they are.
If the zoo's have enough money they can provide a simliar environment for the animals and in fact access to medical treatment and adequate food.
Some of the animals finding a home at a Zoo cannot be released back into the wild anyway. They had a death sentence.
morally responsible
Submitted on June 29th, 2008 by koolmom21Who ever made the decision to feed the tiger less is morally responsible for both the tiger and the 17 years olds death.
I have 3 yorkies and was told only to feed them 3 times a day. I never took this advise. I leave their food out all day and all of them are healthy and normal weight. Only the animal be it human, dog or tiger knows when it is hungry and when it is full.
Its both
Submitted on June 29th, 2008 by PabloI have seen some really nice zoos and some really horrid ones.
What I noticed is that with the larger more dangerous animals they are treated unfairly. Their enclosures are often too small.
Feed according to a zoo magazine is a primary concern for all zoos.
The smaller zoos sometimes do not have enough money to feed all the animals like they should or like the animal would get its food in the wild.
Thus food rationing does happen in smaller zoos. The food rations are rotated around so that each animal suffers for a time.
Bears my suffer one month, then the Deer, then the Big cats, then the buffalo and so forth.
The best zoo I have seen as far as care is concerned is not the San Diego one or even the national zoo. But a medium size zoo in Florida.
More often its big city zoos which have more problems especially in a down economy and when cities are strapped for cash. Those zoos are so easily destablized because of cut backs or fall prey to low attendance. More often than not, those zoos low attendance is do to poor upkeep over time.
But as for the SF zoo, it looks more like a design flaw than anything else at this time. The fence and wall were too short and the moat was not wide enough for the world's largest cat which can jump pretty darn high and far.
Yes
Submitted on June 29th, 2008 by Skye RiversI hate seeing animals caged up. i believe they can sense what is happening around them. I might agree with John on this one about under feeding the tiger and it attacking another out of pure hunger. They don't deserve this, and if they have to live under circumstances such as this, they should be treated with honor. Let us not forget, no matter how tamed an animal is, it is still an animal and can react in a manner that sometimes we don't understand; therefore should be completely respected.