extramarrital affair impeachable offense, KILLING INOCENT PEOPLE NOT.
Posted 11 weeks 1 day ago bySeem's like I found a nitch that gets to some people. Nut case I think not, Last time history allowed someone to kill without just cause it was WW2 Germany Hitler. The U.S.A. woke up finnally after MIILIONS of jew's died. How many must we kill before the democrats we the people elected nearly 2 year's ago on the campaign Promise of they would end the war in Iraq. While they do nothing, I'm affraid the country as a hole has a low respect for human life, But a high regard for show me the MONEY.
Thoughts
first there was persacution
Submitted on June 13th, 2008 by Anonymousfirst there was persacution then it becamce exacution. the extermination camps came because bullets an mass graves could not kill jews fast enough. jerk
Human life is held in High Regard
Submitted on June 12th, 2008 by reagan81Human life is treasured. When this country was attacked innocent people lost their lives in New York. The proactive approach of the Bush administration has lessoned the number of innocent lives that will be lost. I wouldn't want anyone to lose their life, but loss of life in service to the country is just how it is. Sitting back like we did during the Clinton administration is how you lose cities of people.
Georgie raised his hand
Submitted on June 12th, 2008 by AnonymousOn October 11 2002 the House voted 296-133, the Senate 77-23 to authorize the use of force in Iraq. Those figures prove at least 373 other members of our elected government supported the war. Facts are fact, opinions often change.
Rejected
Submitted on June 12th, 2008 by rom12921Rejecting the Premise, not missing the point.
Tomcatin does not know what he's talking about, plain and simple. His blog contains multiple errors in history and logic.
Also Clinton committed perjury and lost his law license as a penalty. There is a difference between a perpetraitor (sp intentional) convicted on evidence and unsubstantiated accusations.
BTW your CAPS LOCK IS ON
MISSING THE POINT ROM12921
Submitted on June 12th, 2008 by REEDDARRELLI'M NOT SURE,BUT I THINK THE POINT TOMCATIN4U IS TRYING TO MAKE IS A COMPARISON BETWEEN CONGRESS TRYING TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT CLINTON FOR CHEATING ON HIS WIFE,KNOWING HE AS WELL AS ANY CHEATING PERSON WOULD DO IS LIE ABOUT IT,THOUGH PRES.CLINTON DID NOT KNOW THE TRAP HAD BEEN SET.SO WHEN HE LIED ABOUT LEWINSKI AFFAIR,THE TRAP SLAMED SHUT ON PERJURY.THE COMPARISON TO HITLER MAY BE A STRETCH,BUT IF GEORGIE HAD STAYED IN THE WEST WING AND PLAYED WITH HIS BLOCKS AS HE SHOULD HAVE,WE WOULD'NT BE IN IRAQ AND PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE WONDERING WHY CONGRESS IS NOT STOPPING THIS INSANITY.AND IMPEACHING GEORGIE FOR NOT PLAYING NICE.GEORGIE AND DICKIE JUST DID'NT PLAN AHEAD,THEY COULD SEE THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQI PEOPLE DIEING FOR THEIR STUPITY,NOT TO MENTION OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS WHO HAVE DIED NEEDLESSLY.SO TO THE POINT THE DEMOCRATS DON'T HAVE THE GUTS TO DO WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE IN 2006.THEY CAN ONLY TELL YOU YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT,UNLESS THEY WANT THEM TO FOR THE CANDIDATE THE DNC WANTS TO BE ELECTED.
Historical accuracy
Submitted on June 11th, 2008 by AnonymousThe entrance of the United States into WWII against the Germans had absolutely nothing to do with the persecution of Jews. Get your facts in order. Your timeline is also incorrect. Millions of Jews did not die until after America entered the war. Auchwitz, Buchenwald, etc.. were barely operational in the winter of 41/42.
Anger, misery, you'll suffer unto me
Submitted on June 11th, 2008 by rom12921Tom may be angry, but I'm not. Just refuting somone who does not know recent history. I am choosing to believe he/she does not know and simply making an honest mistake. Otherwise, they would be making disingenuous invalid comparisons.
tom,
Submitted on June 11th, 2008 by HamiltonYou seem to be feeling particularly angry today. Cheer up, maybe they will impeach Bush.
Dear nut case
Submitted on June 11th, 2008 by rom12921"Last time history allowed someone to kill without just cause it was WW2 Germany Hitler" Murder happens daily. Seems like you are unaware of the tribal genocide occurring in African countries. Rwanda being the most publicized. "Allowing" is disingenuous. If you read history allies could not be stop Nazi Germany in the late 1930's and early 1940's. Also the implied comparison to the President of the United States is invalid: 1. Congressional support of use of force 2. Iraq President in violation on U.N. 3. The intent of the offensive was not to murder innocents.
"The U.S.A. woke up finnally after MIILIONS of jew's died." We did not know the extent of the killing of Jews, dissenters, "unfit".
"How many must we kill before the democrats we the people elected nearly 2 year's ago on the campaign Promise of they would end the war in Iraq" You use "kill" for the holocaust and for Iraq. A military operation and genocide have different intent.