I Believe In Barock Obama
Posted 17 weeks 5 days ago byI really believe that obama should be our next president........He is a very good, strong man with great morals....He loves his family and his country......For you that are voting elsewhere, I wish you would reconsider.........I am an individual who does not have a party, but believes in voting for the person........I am a 52 year old woman who has never believed in anyone so much as i do in obama....You know even if i am spelling his name wrong, it doesnt really matter....The passion i feel towards this man as our future president is overwhelming.......I feel so good and so right about him...All the "stuff" about the preacher rev.wright, is just well, someones opinion......Rev.Wright i believe made a very bad judgement in going on tv and talking anything about obama......I mean the man is a preacher.....Do you think preachers only talk about good???? He should not have said what he did, in my opinion......and barack i think, made a very hard choice and elected to leave rev. wright behind.......please people of america, we do not need another bush, like mcCain would be.......and we do not need hilary in the white house as president........she lies too much......nothing is perfect but lying is not a very nice way to be..............













Thoughts
Makes sense
Submitted on July 2nd, 2008 by PabloMontel Williams is a professed Muslim!
Obama is closet Muslim who is using Trninity Church to hide the realities that Mr. Obama has been a practicing muslim for years.
Yet no one will call Obama on it. Specifically the 2006 video and pictures of Obama making the pledge of Islam in Africa!
Even on CNN today, all his front men have been trying to do the shell game.
The Black guy S Madison said not to look at Obama's religion look at Obama's economic plans. Religion is just a wedge issue.
Then this same guy who is one of Obama's media guys said that one day Obama will say that Obama believes in the Resurection of Christ and Salvation.
It was very telling on prime time CNN when Obama's own media machine has to admit that Obama has never said that he believes in the Resurection of Christ and the Salvation which Christ brings. Which is extremely out of place for a guy who claims to be a christian but make perfect sense if he is a muslim!!!
hey minuteman, bro..
Submitted on July 1st, 2008 by John 2000where ya been? Good to see ya drop in !
OOOPs ... that was from May 7
WOW!
Submitted on July 1st, 2008 by HamiltonI think that’s a great idea, Barack Hussein Obama, should select Montel, that’s the best idea I’ve ever heard, great job anonymous
B. Hamilton Langrehr:
The Hamilton Post: www.thehamiltonpost.blogspot.com
blangrehr@gmail.com
VICE-PRESIDENT ELECT
Submitted on July 1st, 2008 by AnonymousTODAY I WAS WATCHING MONTEL WILLIAMS ON T.V.
AND I SAW MONTEL WILLIAMS AS OUR NEXT V.P.
EVERYONE LOVES HIM AND THEY TRUST HIM.
THEY KNOW MONTEL AS A REAL PERSON.
BARACK, THE TWO OF YOU WOULD BE WONDERFUL
FOR AMERICA.
' WE NEED CHANGE'
Blind Obedience to the golden calf
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by Minuteman CA"He might know racist people, but he hasn't achieved political success by appealing to them." --Joel
Are you kidding me? B. Hussein Obama joined Wright's racist church in order to fully integrate himself in the heart's and minds of the church going blacks that would eventually elect him. What this fine oustanding man did was much more than just appeal to the racist people of influence to get a position of power. What he did was to prey on the poor people who had been systematically manipulated by sermon after sermon of "black theology."
Obama is worse than Wright. He used Wright to gain afilliation with a "religious" organization to furhter his political ambitions. He then uses Oprah(coincidentally a one-time member of Trinity United) as an endorsement to his abomination of a presidential campaign. Now, Obama finally turns away from his self-appointed campaign spiritual advisor?
If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, then my friend, it isn't the first honest politician to ever walk the Earth. Barack is what he is. No matter how many excuses you make for each of the seemingly insignificant issues that seem to constant surround this shadowy figure, the fact is that they do add up to provide a terrifyingly clear picture of what he is all about.
Congratulations to the millions who can't see past the hype of him being a well-spoken black candidate. You, I fear, are electing a monster that will surely "change" our nation, but I fear not for the better.
LOL let the truth come out
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by PabloObama said in September of 2007 that Rev Wright his personal Mentor, was not just his pastor but close friend.
He then went on and said that Rev Wright would be his moral and spiritual barometer while he was in the white house and Rev Wright would have his ear on what the people of America needs.
Suddenly, Rev Wright is not his close friend but just his pastor. That Rev Wright is not his Mentor but just pastor. Not only that, but Obama for 20 years never heard Rev Wright say anything that is disturbing of the likes which he was shown before the whole Nation.
Face it. Rev Wright is a Black liberation leader first and a pastor second. This means that Rev Wright is a racist but a type of racism where its justifible because the blacks have been oppressed in times past. Thus its ok for the Black community to be angery, hateful and project racism toward the oppressive whites for crimes that happened as much as 300 years ago.
My white father was from the south. He never showed racism. MY grandfather also never showed racism and owned a grocery store and gave credit to the black community in the deep south and during the depression when basically no other store would give blacks credit even in the good times. My great grandfather who was 10 years old at the end of the civil war did not come from a background of slave owners. simply not everyone in the south owned slaves. My great great grandfather did not own slaves and owns substancial land in Alabama but he was a military man and soldier. He fought with the south because not to was to be attacked and lose everything. My great great great grandfather was from Virginia and he did not own slaves and was a military man who fought during the War of 1812 as a general. His father before him also did not own slaves and was a military soldier who fought in the Revolutionary war as a captan. His father also did not own slaves and was a ships master and first mate on a British Man O War. His father before him was a Virginia land owner and He did have servants in the mid 1600 and he was a man of English nobility but the servants were not black but white indentured servants from England.
But according to Rev Wright, all whites are racist, oppressors who contributed to the slavery issue and it is the whites in government who oppress the black people and do horrible things thus all whites must be fought and defeated by any means. (From Rev Wright's own sermons)
That is just one problem with Obama. He linked himself with Wright and gave Rev Wright the position of Moral authority and agreement of his ideals back in September of 2007. Now people know more about this moral authority and man who would have Obama's ear.
Then you have Ayers. A man whom Obama is in active business partnership with.
Then you have a long list of other extremely poor to down right pitiful reputations who are criminals, terrorists and represent everything that is against the American way of Life.
If anything, Obama has shown a pattern of extremely bad to horrid judgement.
Then you have Obama saying that he would meet with Iran, Hamas, hezbola or other terrorist back in August of 2007. In 2008, suddenly he would not meet with some but others he would meet with.
Obama has said that our military has done a poor job in Iraq and fighting a war he never approved or voted for nor could ever have approved or voted for.
Let see. That's a lie. Obama was not in congress in order to vote his position. Secondly, it shows poor to extremely bad judgement once again.
In 2002, Saddom said he was going to give his WMD to terrorist or would use them himself against the agressors/ Oppressors of Iraq. Yet 120 something of the UN members which there are 176 of them all thought that Saddom had the WMD. 42 countries originally allied themselves with the US to do something about Saddom who was threatening with extreme threats of WMD. Thus in 2002, it was the right choice to do something about it.
The problem in Iraq today has nothing to do with how we got there. That is a pure fact. Rumsfeld and the first commander on the ground did an excellent job of kicking saddom out of office. But screwed up royally in dealing with a collapsed government and then did nothing as the country began to spiral out of control into caos. Thus America waisted 4 years just to get back to where we were in 2003 in Iraq today.
If Obama begins to pull out troops too fast, then caos spirals back out of control in Iraq and a civil war will happen.
Iran will not respect Obama because of the current statements that Obama has said that the middle east is not a place where America should be involved in. Thus Iran will push on to gain control of Iraq so that they can link themselves with Syria and reach the end goal of having access by land for their armies to attack Israel. (Iran has openly stated this as a goal. Why does CNN not report it? They are not about real news of importance)
Obama's ecconimic plans is about taxation. Taxing businesses.
The windfall profits board is such an Idiocy idea that is rooted in Marxism or pure communistic ideals. Once the board is in place, any business that makes more profit than the government think you should will have those profits taken away. (From Obama's Own plan for Ecconomic policy)
If you think the exit of American business is leaving is bad enough, it will be a stampeed to get out of the US if this passed or is even had a bill written about it.
Obama's idea of fixing oil prices is taxing the oil companies all those extra profits. Just how much does the oil companies make in profits? 8.4% Its not the huge amounts that people think it is nor is it the oil companies that are driving up the price. Thus Obama has lied once again.
Its Opec that is raising the price along with World market demand. If oil companies has their profits taken away, they will not drill new wells and will not add any new production into the US market. Thus America become even more dependent upon Foreign oil that will reach $500 a barrel.
Obama bring no solutions but will bring bad judgement, allow terrorists and racist to sway his opinion and policies.
The last thing is that Obama has said that he wants to reduce the number of military soldiers and assets America has. That was the same idiocy of the Carter presidency and all it did was make America a global target for all sorts of criminals, rebels and terrorists. It was the pure fact that Carter in reducing the CIA, and the Military that allowed Terrorists and other extreme groups to show how America is weak and open to attack witout serious worry of retrobution.
Obama will destroy America while he dances around making pretty speeches which offer no real solutions to the problems of the poor or average American. Obama is banking on the fact that the media has made President Bush such a hated name and presidency along with the bad policies of the people Bush has surrounded himself with to let him walk into the presidency. Obama's ideal presidency is to destroy the constitution and the freedoms we American have.
What is the saddist thing, is that America is no longer the most free country on the planet. America is becoming more socialist with Marxist leanings and we are watching more and more of American personal freedoms get taken away.
To give a little feedom here and there for a little safety or security will in the end leave you with neither safety or security. This is because government will become so larger and so powerful that it will crush and destroy its citizens. (Geroge Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Ben Franklin, John Adams, Richard jackson, Robert Lee, Roger Sherman, J Q Adams, John Livingston, Rev John Witherspoon, Alexander Hamilton and Edward Rutledge all made this statement or a version of it) Ex: "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" B Franklin. ""Thoſe who would give up Essential Liberty to purchaſe a little Temporary Safety, deſerve neither Liberty nor Safety." R Jackson. "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power." D Hume. " Men are so wicked as we now see them with Religion what would they be if without it?" J Witherspoon. "Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither." J Madison.
Why did I post so many quotes? To show before all how much Obama is out of Touch with what America really stands for!
Jiminy Cricket!
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by HamiltonYou’ve got to be kidding me. It’s a black liberation theology church in Chicago that started Barracks political career. The most racists tax exempt church in America. And you’re talking about a conscious decision to court a particular segment of society. Not just a conscious choice but a steadfast commitment that last for twenty years. The Bush political decision was to try and appeal to Christian, is that why Senator Obama chose Trinity? I deeply understand the aversion of the left towards God, faith and guns, after all we simply believe Jesus loves everybody.
Just doesn't work
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by rom12921"He might know racist people, but he hasn't achieved political success by appealing to them. I can't say the same for George W. Bush."
Ridiculous assertion, comparing the George Bush and Barack Obama for the company they keep. I see you still maintain your membership.
Re: Blind obedience
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by JoelActually, Hamilton, I think it's worse.
The Bush campaign made a conscious decision to appeal to -- and exploit -- the votes of people who couldn't be bothered to drop retrograde racial attitudes until after the 21st century had started, and then only under pressure. And it wasn't an isolated incident: You'll remember the "black child" rumors that followed John McCain around South Carolina that same year.
Barack Obama heard bad sermons for 20 years. But there's nothing in his policies or his politics to indicate that he harbors racist or black supremicist plans. He might know racist people, but he hasn't achieved political success by appealing to them. I can't say the same for George W. Bush.
Blind obedience!
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by HamiltonGeorge Bush spoke at Bob Jones, a fundamentalist Christian University that has since repelled any antiquated race regulating rules. As a matter of fact, it was because of President Bush’s visit and the media attention BJU received that shocked its broad into re-examining and changing the once racist rules. Joel do you seriously equate one speech to attending and being a member for twenty years? Please do better than that; we surely don’t see Reverend Wright changing or clarifying his personal or theological racisms for the good of the country or Senator Obama.
Giving a speech now is “undisputable” proof of being a racist; I wonder what that says about Senator McCain giving a speech at the national La-Raza convention? Does that make him a reverse double racist, or not a racists or…I’m confused, but all I know for sure is that Reverend Wright is not a racist and it does not reflect at all on Senator Obama’s decision making skills or his sincere opinion of white Christian Americans.
Game On
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by rom12921I agree with "decent man. I think he honestly believes he is doing good." He seems to be a well-intentioned principled man. However, I disagree with his foreign policy and am dissapointed in his lack of fiscal conservatism.
Re: Bush hater
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by JoelRom, I'll agree that there's some blind Bush-hatred out there.
But that's not my game. I think he is, in a very narrow sense, a fundamentally decent man. I think he honestly believes he is doing good.
My problem is that he isn't actually doing good. That's not "Bush hatred." That's looking at his record and having proper disdain for his actions.
creative, consistently inconsistent
Submitted on May 7th, 2008 by rom12921* Represents a real threat to our national security. He creates terrorists by invading nations where they don't exist, and he refuses to talk with our enemies.
Bush does not created terrorists- radical Islam and hatred for the devil -American way of life.
* Had absolutely no qualifications to be the leader of our great country. He had a little more than one term as governor of Texas -- a "weak governor" state that puts its real power in the Legislature.
The no qualifications argument could just as easily be used against Bill Clinton. Reg TX ...Not true, the Lieutinent Gov in TX has the most power- Bob Bullock(D)had alot to with running the State and the Bush Governorship.
* Has little to say of substance, offering flowery speeches about "democracy" without having a real clue that creating it involves more than holding elections.
"little ...of substance","Flowery speeches" , this could be said of Obama or any other politican. Also, I didn't know you were clairvoyant.
* Never served in combat, either
Yep, same could be said of other Pres.
Please give up your membership in the Bush hater's club and get on with your life.
What will an Obama presidency bring!
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by PabloWhat will Obama bring to the table with the Democratic party now in control of the government over the last year and a half.
Lets see:
Higher taxes.
Higher oil prices
More Job loss
More elite left wing ideals
No relief on healthcare
No relief from insurance
No relief from Foreclosures
No relief on Foreign Oil
Destroy the American Military to the point that America can not even defend itself properly. ( Cater and Clinton presidecies are prime examples)
Huge job exit out of the country
Making friends with the people who have vowed to Kill all Americans
Get America into a war that makes Iraq look like a kiddie scrum.
Loss of gobal respect into a all time low
Make America a nation of poor
Increase the wealth of the politcians or those who feed the political Machine.
Loss of of the bill of rights mainly the 2nd first with the first going shortly there after.
Make America have to abide by laws not approved by American people but approved by the enemies of America.
This is just a short list of the extreme left part of the democratic party has said it wants to do when they control the government.
People wonder why things are getting worse rahter than better? The democratic party in 2006 was not about the people nor is it still about the people. The democratic party was never about the people in recent history. You have to go back to Roosevelt to find the democratic party for the people.
Now its about Taking God out of the government and out of the peoples lives. Obama even in his bitter comments made this clear that people who cling to guns and religion are not good for America.
Its no secret the democratic party platform. They have always wanted the 2nd Admendment to go away. The democratic party under Clinton presidency tried to pass a bill to modify the 1st admendment.
Its time for people to wake up and realize that party solves nothing. That the current candidates offer absolutely no solutions for America.
That if Obama gets into the Whitehouse things will go from worse to hell in a hand basket.
Its not hope that Obama is pushing but an oligarky type of dictatorship where less than 20 people who are the billionaires into what they want America to be. These people are not interested in the daily problems of the people or any other life shattering effects of the war on Terrorism or ecconomy because they can distance themselves or even leave America if it falls.
The truth is that the people have to stand up and take charge for themselves. The people have the power to make laws that even congress can not remove. America has the power to remove anyone in government. But the people will have to get serious about what is best for America.
America needs to stop trying to be like the rich and famous and just be themselves. Because the Rich and famous like in Hollywood are few and far between and are normally the most unsocial people you have ever come accross and are generally the most hateful and ignorant people as well.
the liberating adventures of young Hussein..
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by Minuteman CAThanks for your comments Joel.
I'm not a fan of Bush, so I have nothing to say about your list of Bushwacking. I never voted for him, so I can't say that I completely disagree with you. This will be my first vote for a Presidential candidate who is not a Democrat. What can I say? I bought a house, pay more taxes, got tired of the party line, and now..I doubt I'll ever vote for the great smurf elephant again. It also helps to be living in what would be called Aztlan if the nuevo Democratic politicians in California have thier way.
As for holding Republican candidates accountable, I would say absolutely.It is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to criticize and scrutinize these candidates. This isn't class president we are talking about here, after all. Here we go. I think that McCain is a Republican only in name. He is an advid open-borders advocate, sharing the Democratic anti-American soveriegnty line.
As for Iraq, I'd have to say that I don't agree with the reasoning on entering Iraq, however, I do believe that it is no coincidence that no major attack on the U.S. has transpired since 2001. I fully support waging unbrideled warfare on the jihadists. I agree that we are much better off focusing thier efforts in the Middle East instead of on our soil. So,..let's just say that I feel no sympathy for any appropriately deceased terrorists.
I understand that some people are hypnotized by the Obama theme song, but I would challenge you to be just as critical of your messiah as you ask others to be of thier presumptive candidates.
Of course it does.
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by HamiltonCamelot has returned; American royalty and the Democratic Party; the glory days of liberal politics in our great country. The radical left is giddy with excitement for a return to power. Us bitter, religious clinging Christians should be grateful that we finally have a man of brilliance and a party of genius to lead us out of ignorance. Senator Obama, a shining example of divine destiny, undeniable integrity and infallible judgment. If you don’t believe me just ask Reverend Wright, who knows Senator Obama better than his mentor, pastor and personal advisor for two decades? Wait…that’s wrong, my mistake, the good senator never realized that his friend was an American hating, white people despising racist; so we better not ask Reverend Wright. That’s right, Senator Obama has disowned Reverend Wright; now I remember, so much for a dear old uncle. You’re right Joel, I was just trying to be funny.
Re: Entertainer?
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by JoelHamilton: I'm sure you're just joking again, but this comment honestly makes no sense at all.
Re: Obama
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by JoelThanks for your comments, dutchtreat.
Minuteman, I believe George Bush:
* Has shown some indisputable racist ties to Bob Jones University.
* Was nothing without being a rich candidate with a good name. His lack of experience would be highlighted if he were not a rich candidate with a good name.
* Was not forthright about his playboy background.
* Represents a real threat to our national security. He creates terrorists by invading nations where they don't exist, and he refuses to talk with our enemies.
* Had absolutely no qualifications to be the leader of our great country. He had a little more than one term as governor of Texas -- a "weak governor" state that puts its real power in the Legislature.
* Has little to say of substance, offering flowery speeches about "democracy" without having a real clue that creating it involves more than holding elections.
* Never served in combat, either.
I could keep going. My only point is this, Minuteman: Are you willing to hold Republicans to the same standards that you hold Obama?
(And for the being forthright about his Muslim background: Barack Obama is not a Muslim, secret or otherwise. I'm tired of having to repeat this, but I'm going to.)
He is an Entertainer!
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by HamiltonHe will be the next monarch of the Kingdom of America. The United States are gone for good. Rejoice, his loyal subjects for you have given him your freedom and your future.
Look dutchtreat, I will
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by John 2000Look dutchtreat, I will choose to say I believe what you have said since I am a nice guy. I do wonder though, why it is that you may not know even how to spell his name? You did manage to set up an account here.
I believe..
Submitted on May 6th, 2008 by Minuteman CAI believe Husein Obama:
Has shown some undisputable racist ties to Mr. Wright.
Is nothing without being a black candidate. His lack of experience would be highlighted if he were not a minority candidate.
Is a socialist leaning twit. Anyone heard of his wife's speech in Raliegh, North Carolina on April 08? Look it up. It shows thier views on re-distribution of wealth. That doesn't sound very democratic to me.
Represents a real threat to national security. He isn't very forthwright about his Muslim background and he has already said that he is willing to speak with our enemies.
Has absolutely no qualifications to be the leader of this great country. He has only less than one term in the Senate and count them: 129 present only votes while in the Senate.
Has nothing to say of substance. He speaks flowery rhetoric and plays the pied piper's theme while the droves are hypnotized by his empty song. That is, unless you are so captivated by his one word platform that you believe "change" can only be a good thing.
Is not the person for the job at this time. He lacks the experience necessary to guide us through the many problems we are facing. I, for one, don't feel comfortable voting for someone who has never served this country in the armed forces, at a time when we are at war.
The only bumper sticker that applies for Obama is: Obama/Marx in '08