As Pa. Went; So Will Go Indiana & N.C: Because..The Passerby
Posted 23 weeks 1 day ago byWith history now illuminating the character, along with the disregard of the conventional American values embraced by the common middle class working, Sen. Obama’s showing the voters his prominent weakness as a potential Democrat nominee.
He certainly “talked a good game” in the earlier primaries and caucuses where he massed his to date electorate sum. But as the recent revelations, just a fraction of his liability of judgments, or lack thereof, honesty and the misleading portrayal that he is the cohesive component to be the “great uniter” of the country have proven that he wouldn’t be where he is currently; had he been truthful initially.
The Pennsylvania primary resulted with a decisive statement rendered by the citizens, who much reflect the sentiments of that middle of the road, average people which make up the majority of the country. That no matter what is to be considered as a sure lock of Obama’s candidacy, by the media, among others, representing the Democrats; Pennsylvanians were not to be mistaken for ducks in the Obama row. I expect much concurrence with Pa. on May 6, 2008, when Indiana and North Carolina weigh in.
Despite the attraction of which Sen. Obama’s initial operation that he was the ambassador of change, the representative of hope and a variety host's of other campaign “slogans”, which incidentally are not novel by any stretch of the imagination, the principal agent, Obama, has been detected and indentified as the facts emerge.
In an effort to obscure the real concerns with a possible nominee, i.e.; the condescension which he, himself expressed with his opinions “about people” in small town America, depicting them as some type of a lesser class who harbor hostilities within their communities.
A person of integrity would have addressed his point “to those” of whom he was talking about, rather then using his chosen theme of distain, to a select privileged few, “talking of his subjects” in an exclusive San Franciscan dissertation.
There is during the life of an election a time when a voter has to choose their preference and the measure taken in order to feel comfortable with their decision some basic questions are being processed in ones mind. One such is to ask the person who is seeking the support from the voter is, “is this person like me?” The question is paramount and is not at all to be misconstrued or manipulated in the simplistic forms i.e., ones race, gender, origin, financial status, social status, etc... The fundamental principal is to be addressed in the thought process is answered by recognizing if the candidate is on the same page as we.
Maybe something which recently has created a stir in the campaign is the matter of the positions taken on the gas tax holiday. Obama misses the point entirely, and once again he insults the intelligence of the average working person. Sen. Clinton comprehend that people are well aware that the “holiday” is small potatoes, but rather it is a statement in principle, not about weather one saves “x” amount of money.
Something so simple may not resonate with the elite company of which Obama keeps, but it is not something intended to recreate a new world as we know it.
It is intended as a gesture, which confirms Sen. Clinton is capable of connecting with Middle America. Obama can’t or chooses not to engage with those like us.
Peace, CN, The Passerby
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post" onclick="window.open('http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title), 'delicious','toolbar=no,width=700,height=400'); return false;"> Save This Page</a>













Thoughts
Hillary Will Prove A Point
Submitted on May 4th, 2008 by CNjanmb;
Senator Clinton will receive not only women, she is awaken the sleeping giant, the middle class working men.
Considering Obama's fall from grace and his scant experience the only way she will be turned down is if the Super-degelates' continue to be cowards.
They are not fulfilling their obligation or duty if they present a candidate who not electable and Sen. Obama is not electable.
Not because he's the black-american choice, which is a misnomer he is as white as he is black, bi-racial. He is damaging the party due to his choices, inexperience with government and his haughty self image.
If the supers choose Obama be rest assured that the citizens of this country will elect Sen. McCain, no question.
He, Obama is a mistake waiting for more information to happen; which, rest assured, that the Rep.'s, already have and won't be timid to use. Thanks for your reply.
Peace, CN, The Passerby
We will see. This was a
Submitted on May 4th, 2008 by wishnevskyWe will see. This was a insurgency from the top, the Daley's and the Kennedy's, very clever marketing, but they didn't vet their candidate very well. Elitist and arrogant, worthy of Karl Rove. But some of us are a little more suspicious for some reason.
N.C. & Indy. Are Pa. on 05/06/08
Submitted on May 4th, 2008 by Anonymouswishenvsky:
That's a GOOD thing, Obama is no more ready to be President then I'm I'm prepared to catch Bin Laden.
1) a community organizer; May qualify as Mayor of a small American town, MAYBE, in light of his opinions about small town Americans.
2) 6;- (SIX), years as Illinois State Senator, of which (3) were spent campaigning for the next two year term seat.
3) 1; (ONE) YEAR as a U.S. Senator prior to his, obviously a poor judgment call, for running for the Presidency of these United States; which requires JUST a little bit more experience, wouldn't you agree?
The above resume qualification failed on the initial, add Wright, Resko, Farrakhan, the elititsts speech... and whatever else that earlier voters were't aware of, not to mention whatever more that's waiting to turn up!
No one in Pa. gave much creedance with his POSITION, not VOTE, on Iraq because it was mere arm chair quaterbacking, due to the fact that he wasn't in the U.S.Senate at the time.
North Carolina & Indiana are demographicaly the same as Pa., more importantly the voters choose with the facts they know, and will NOT be munipulated by fancy talk or SPIN. from ANYBODY!
Thanks, Peace, CN, The Passerby
You may be right. I am in
Submitted on May 3rd, 2008 by wishnevskyYou may be right. I am in NC, and two groups of Obama supporters, one at a public gathering and one bunch of neighborhood canvassers were not getting much action. I think i have seen two lawn signs, one for Obama and one for Hillary. Time will tell.
SECOND GUESSING
Submitted on May 3rd, 2008 by janmbGiven the fact that women will not necessarily support other women even if they deserve it, I don't believe Hillary will win the nomination. It was a given that many men wouldn't support a woman for president. .
Hillary has the MEDIA totally against her as well hammering out praises for Obama and less flattering reterok for Hillary.
The MEDIA didn't want to be labeled as lazy- again when they were not at full speed when it came to investigating the reason to invade IRAQ. But they successfully delayed or suppressed the information for months about Pastor Wright and Ayles and let voters be deceived thru many elections.