redblueamerica.com

there is sufficient wiggle room on an item on the list, surely does not invalidate the entire list. I would like to have K-girl step thru the list point by point.

Oh, and thanks for the list, koolmom21.

Let's take a look at your so-called laundry list (isn't it a bummer when people actually bother to read your supporting material?) From the site cited below:

"Lie # 74) “I did not recall meeting Nadhmi Auchi at any time or on any occasion” - LIAR - But a government witness said on Monday, during Antoin Rezko’s corruption trial, that he recalled seeing Sen. Barack Obama at a party that Rezko held in 2004 to honor Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born tycoon. Two other guests at the party declared the Obamas were present at the event, which took place one week before Obama won his U.S. Senate seat.
Source: http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko/894559,CST-NWS-rezko15.article"

Hmmmmm.
How is it a lie when someone says they don't recall meeting someone? How do you know what he remembers? Reading people's minds now? He didn't say he wasn't at the party, he says he doesn't recall meeting the guest of honor. Seems pretty normal for a Washington party that probably had a gazillion guests. The rest of the list is more like this, by the way - things that aren't lies but can be twisted by someone determined not to like Obama for whatever reason. Lesson #1 about the internet: just because somebody took the time to write it doesn't make it true!

Here's the real SCOOP .
Hillary baked cookies and cleaned rooms in the White House for 8 years and otherwise watched Soap Operas and the Martha Stewart show.
When a thousand or more visiting dignitaries were being entertained, she held no discussions with them except housekeeping in the White House and baked cookies for them.
Hillary and Bill had absolutely no discussions about issues concerning our country as she was not interested in any such talk. Nor did she speak to ANYONE of power while residing in the White House about USA policies.
When she traveled overseas 80 times and met with royalty and leaders of sorts, it was only to discuss designer clothes and learning about the preparation of foods in various countries.
Sure she is brilliant but does that count for being president in these times ? Sure she worked for women and children's issues since getting out of lawschool and often free-----but should women care about that----

No one is beating up on anyone! Senator Clinton has lied and gotten caught. That's not anyone being mean to a presidential candidate (which is a little silly anyway, because we need these people tested and vetted), it's fact. The pushback her campaign put out after the 'sniper fire' incident didn't even make sense . . . she believes she has sacrificed a lot for her country and so that worked itself around in her head to having been under attack? That line wasn't a slip of the tongue. It was said repeatedly at campaign events and fundraisers across the country, because it was language that was worked into her stump speech. Plus, it echoed the same argument she's pushed throughout this campaign that she's been a diplomatic leader abroad, even though she never had security clearance high enough to attend any meetings of that sort during her husband's term. Inconsistencies abound.

I don't believe that Obama has lied, but that's really beside the point. Criticism about candidates is both fair and expected, especially where it concerns verifiable statements of fact and not opinions. There is no way to say that this is an unfair attack on Clinton - she said it, and she lied. I'm sure she probably thought there was no way anyone could fact-check her, but that's the risk you take in making up convenient details.

Obama's troubles increase as time goes on, and he's only been in the national "review" one year.
Much more time is necessary for an upstart to "believe" that all of America will follow a questionable unknown whose past negatives far more out weigh his maybe possabilties.
Peace, CN, The Passerby

Clintons to Face Fraud charges and for filing false reports to the FEC. This could be a big problem for the Clintons if she is the nominee and I hope she is not. This is a huge story,even bigger than the Rev Wright story but the mainstream media is not reporting on it. It's Clinton vs Peter Paul The trial is set to start in November.