Opposition research on Hillary ... from the left
Posted 23 weeks 4 days ago byThe jobs of the guys and gals who toil away in the Republican opposition research warrens were made a lot easier yesterday. Flowers and cards are surely on the way to unreformed leftist Tom Hayden, who authored an anti-Hillary piece for the unreformed leftist magazine The Nation. Why rely on conservatives to bring up Hillary's shady, radical lefty past when a lefty can do it for you?
By Hayden's telling — and he's a dude who knows what he's talking about — Hillary's sprint away from her radical heritage makes his wife scream in frustration. That's why he's so hurt that Hillary would try to pass herself off as a more moderate version of the radical lefty Obama. As Hayden notes, it's a disingenuous ploy:
[A]fter Yale law school, Hillary went to work for the left-wing Bay Area law firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, which specialized in Black Panthers and West Coast labor leaders prosecuted for being communists. Two of the firm's partners, according to Treuhaft, were communists and the two others "tolerated communists". Then she went on to Washington to help impeach Richard Nixon, whose career was built on smearing and destroying the careers of people through vague insinuations about their backgrounds and associates. (All these citations can be found in Carl Bernstein's sympathetic 2007 Clinton biography, A Woman in Charge.)
All these were honorable words and associations in my mind, but doesn't she see how the Hillary of today would accuse the Hillary of the sixties of associating with black revolutionaries who fought gun battles with police officers, and defending pro-communist lawyers who backed communists? Doesn't the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whom Hillary attacks today, represent the very essence of the black radicals Hillary was associating with in those days? And isn't the Hillary of today becoming the same kind of guilt-by-association insinuator as the Richard Nixon she worked to impeach?
So, in Hayden's eyes, defending violent Black Panthers and anti-American commies is "honorable." And the rants of Wright, he says, shouldn't just stick to Obama, but Hillary, too — since Wright represents "the very essence of the black radicals Hillary was associating with in those days."
This is why Democrats are so nervous, and probably screwed. Though Hillary is trying to sell herself to Democratic "super delegates" as a more palatable alternative to Obama, they are both hard lefties. And neither candidate will be able to outrun their radical records and history — the kind of record that Hayden has so helpfully noted with his embrace.
Thanks, dude. Smoke a bowl for me. (HT: Ramesh Ponnuru at The Corner.)














Thoughts
LOL fun
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by John 2000Say, can Charlie Manson be dragged into this somehow?
Re: Hanoi Jane
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by Jim LakelyIn good time, my friend. It's a looooong campaign. Much fun lies ahead.
Cheers!
Bowling for Crying-bine
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by Jim LakelyLooks like you're gonna get stuck with the "whiny" label, too. (Ok. Truce! Truce! :-)
By the way, you and Ben were great on the radio today. I listened in at the tail end of your appearance on the Steve Fast Show in Bloomington, Ill.
Others who want to check out Joel and Ben duking it out live and on the radio should check out this link.
Re: Hayden
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by JoelMercyphotography:
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Joel
Hanoi Jane
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by MercyphotographyJoel,
At least Jim did not bring along in his story Hayden's ex. And quite frankly.... I wonder why.
May be he just forgot.
Best.
Re: Bowling
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by JoelBut unfortunately, I'm still stuck with the "snippy" label, never to shed.
Re: Bowling?
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by Jim LakelyGilbert,
The bowling and pin stuff was a joke.
Cheers!
Jim
Bowling?
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by MercyphotographyDear Jim,
I did not know that bowling is so critical to be commander in chief....as far as Hillary and Obama being " radical lefties", please give me a break.
Further, you should be happy now that Hillary is talking about " bombing Iran "...you know all too well that Senator Clinton is a centrist just like her husband. The Black Panthers argument will not stick, even so I know, you will keep trying.
And, my friend Jim, the flag pin issue is not a distraction. Once again, it takes more to be a patriot then to wear a flag on your suit. The last time I checked Pres. Bush did not fight in Vietnam neither did Dick Cheney.
Got to go, my radical friends invited me for the 40 years celebration of the 1968's Columbia riots.
Happy trails.
Re: Re: Opposing
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by Jim LakelyJoel says:
No need to get snippy, Joel. The American flag lapel pin issue is merely a distraction from the real issue: How a man who can't beat a 7-year-old girl at bowling thinks he can be president.
And a strong advocate at that ... and
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by John 2000... given the Hayden source of the attack, I would not be making a big deal of it. I don't think it will gain Mr Obama additional support provided she does not over-react to it.
No doubt, Hillary has a number of things in her past that can be spun injuriously. The smears projected at her would certainly have been more public in the 1990's Clinton Era, if they really had strong legs. The piece is really a play to super-delegates who have to decide :
Which is the least vulnerable candidate as much as who is the stronger candidate?
My current intuition informs me that Hillary wins on both those questions.
"My mine field is safer than yours!"
At least Hillary has a proven record for having accomplished some good things beyond purely racial context. You have cited some of them in this blog.
** I don't think it is necessarily wise to use any Carter connection in her defense if you catch my drift.
Re: Opposing
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by JoelWell, clearly one's resume doesn't matter quite as much -- with regards to her presidential mettle -- as does one's ability to wear a flag pin stylishly.
Re: Opposing Hillary
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by Jim LakelyAnd all that qualifies her to be president ... um ... how?
OPPOSING HILLARY
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by janmbAn advocate of women and children's issues---Hillary would not be considered that important to men. Hillary was active in a number of organizations concerned with the welfare of children after law school ---often worked for FREE and was the first female partner at Rose Law Firm in 1979 and was listed as one of the one hundred most influential lawyers in America in 1988 and 1991. Hillary advised the Children's Defense Fund in Cambridge and joined the impeachment inquiry staff advising the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives.
President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the board of the Legal Services Corporation She chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee, co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, and served on the boards of the Arkansas Children's Hospital, Legal Services, and the Children's Defense Fund.
Good blog ...
Submitted on April 24th, 2008 by John 2000reminds me of an old Keystone Cops movie ... appropriate I guess coming so close on the heels of the I-won/No-I-Won vote in the Keystone State.
Tom Heyden, heh? It must be a boon for Hillary as much as it hurts her.
Double Suicide on Democratic Ticket.
Bush Blamed.
McCain says "They were both good and honorable people. I guess I don't need much money after all."