Ben

What's the matter with Obama and Pennsylvania

Apparently, Barack Obama has read Thomas Frank. But have Pennsylvania voters? According to Huffington Post's Mayhill Fowler, who is clearly in the tank for Hillary Clinton, Obama had some fairly condescending things to say about long-suffering inhabitants of rural Pennsylvania and middle America at a California fundraiser last Sunday:

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said.

"And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

Just to be clear, Obama is saying that if you live in an old, blue-collar industrial town, you can't be blamed for being a gun-toting, religious, immigrant-hating extremist. Those poor folks just don't realize that they've been voting against their economic interests all these years, as Frank so helpfully informed us in his book. I don't buy it, but lots of people do. Obama certainly seems to. He needs all the support he can get on April 22.

I bet Hillary Clinton accepts the Frank thesis, too. But that didn't stop her from seizing on Obama's remarks with gusto. "Pennsylvanians," Clinton told a crowd in the Keystone State today, "don't need a president who looks down on them. They need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families." Team McCain piled on, too. "It shows an elitism and condescension towards hardworking Americans that is nothing short of breathtaking," said McCain spokesman Steve Schmidt. "It is hard to imagine someone running for president who is more out of touch with average Americans."

And now Obama's campaign is in full defense mode. Said spokesman Tommy Vietor:

Senator Obama has said many times in this campaign that Americans are understandably upset with their leaders in Washington for saying anything to win elections while failing to stand up to the special interests and fight for an economic agenda that will bring jobs and opportunity back to struggling communities. And if John McCain wants a debate about who's out of touch with the American people, we can start by talking about the tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans that he once said offended his conscience but now wants to make permanent.

I've read some clever reactions from the right side of the blogosphere. "This is probably just a tin-eared moment for a guy normally adept at avoiding such things," wrote Ken McCracken in a post at Say Anything titled Obama Disses The Hicks And Rubes Of Pennsylvania. "It does give a glimpse into his worldview, however."

Indeed, Tom Maguire at Just One Minute described Obama's remarks as "unleash(ing) his inner Michelle."

Jim Geraghty at National Review. as always, cuts right to the quick: "Boy, I'd hate for people to get bitter, and to cling to antipathy to people who aren't like them because of, say, a religious leader... You know, somebody preaching hate from the pulpit or something like that. Good thing Barack Obama is always on top of circumstances like that, and would never stand for that..."

Meanwhile, the gents over at The American Spectator's blog are having a fairly involved discussion. "Pomo-con" James Poulos offers a "quixotic" defense of Obama's statement, noting "Any American liberal or conservative or libertarian (or socialist or...) worth his or her salt should be able, I think, to readily recognize this character as close or very close to representing a real constituent and riff accordingly on his plight and who's to blame. So it seems to me Obama's done."

That's actually not a bad way of considering the comments, come to think of it. However, as James Antle observes, "there is something vaguely pejorative about his description of these voters and his framing of their issues -- they're bitter, they 'cling' to guns and religion, they have an 'antipathy' toward immigrants and foreigners. This isn't helped by the context: Obama was giving this little sociology lecture to a bunch of Marin County fat cats."

But, because this is Obama we're talking about, there is always Hope. Ace reports how Obama is already mending fences with any offended sons of the soil. Good luck with that.