Our moral responsibility to Iraq
Posted 22 weeks 7 hours ago byJohn McCain says we have a moral responsibility to stay in Iraq:
“We have incurred a moral responsibility in Iraq. It would be an unconscionable act of betrayal, a stain on our character as a great nation, if we were to walk away from the Iraqi people and consign them to the horrendous violence, ethnic cleansing and possibly genocide that would follow a reckless, irresponsible and premature withdrawal.”
I admit, this is the one object to withdrawal that I sometimes find compelling. But it doesn't stand up on close examination.
For one thing, there has been no shortage of horrendous violence and ethnic cleansing on our watch. A lot of the reduction in violence we've seen in Iraq in recent months has been attributed to the Anbar Awakening and the surge -- but there's also the untidy fact that many Baghdad neighborhoods had been ethnically cleansed by the time the surge had started. Much of the damage that can be done has been done.
Plus, there's the so-called "flypaper theory" that conservatives like to tout -- the idea being that we're fighting terrorists in Iraq so we don't have to fight them here. But there weren't really terrorists to fight in Iraq until we created a target for them there; Al Qaeda in Iraq, such as it is, is powered mainly by fighters angry about the American presence there. Given that native Sunnis in Iraq seem to hate Al Qaeda more than they hate us -- for now -- we might be able to do a moral good and reduce violence simply by getting out.
Finally, there's the whole question of whether we can really afford this enterprise. Joseph Stiglitz, of course, thinks the war will end up costing us $3 trillion. That's money that must be paid by American taxpayers and their children, and one does have to question the morality of creating a heavy financial burden to pay for a war that has made us less safe. Our moral obligations rest not just with the Iraqis, but with our own people.
In the end, Matt Yglesias probably puts it best:
One gets weary of pointing this out, but over and over again we see withdrawal plans being judged by worst-case scenarios whereas staying scenarios are judged by best-case scenarios. The truth of the matter is that no matter what we do with the American military, the course of events in Iraq will ultimately be determined by decisions made by Iraqis. If we leave, they might choose poorly with disastrous results. But that can happen if we stay, too.

















Thoughts
Terrorists every where
Submitted on March 26th, 2008 by AnonymousYes Micheal, there was terrorists in Irag during Saddams reign. Just not the ones that attacked the U.S. on 9-11-01.
You can look at just about every country in the world and find terrorists, even in the U.S.A. Do you remember the Federal Building in OC. Do we invade every country that has terrorists?
He was funding terrorists and gassing his own people, even when our own gov. was helping him during the Iraq-Iran war.
As with him creating a quagmire in the region (Middle East?). It has been a quagmire for centuries, and it will be a quagmire long after we leave.
No army, politician or God can get people to live in peace. As long as they have deep rooted religous and ethnic differences.
Let us get out of this civil war, let them fight it out for themselves. Just like we did back in 1860.
Sorry couldn't open your blog, or couldn't find it.
I respectfully disagree
Submitted on March 26th, 2008 by AnonymousAssuming that there were no terrorists in IRAK is naive at best.
Saddam handed out $rewards for any Suicide Bomber in Israel, promising their families to take cae of them.
Read your history about his support to the Feddayeen and his direct connection with Hamas and other Terror organizations. Read about his son Uday, planning for assasinations in London.
The ethnic cleansing had been done by Saddam, gasing a quarter million of Kurds and eradicating his own Shiites.
His expansionist ambitions, plans to domninate the region and develop WDMs would have created a quagmire, if we had waited any longer.
To pacify and stabilize such a chaotic region and still loose only 4000 Soldiers as opposed to the losses in WWII, Vietnam. Korea is quite actually amazing. Go to Iraq now - you will not recognize the country anymore. All the people hear here are reports about roadside bombs, as it makes for sexy news. The steady development of this country is of course boring, but nevertheless visible.
As far as the impact of the war on our economy and the imminent geostrategic role of IRAQ with direct impact on our National Security are concerned, read my article on http://ca4mccain.blogspot.com/
Michel C. Zala