The Bush Administration is doing something right in the War on Terror
Posted 35 weeks 2 days ago byLet me do something this morning I rarely do: I will praise President Bush and his administration for its evolving conduct of the War on Terror. They've apparently realized you can't kill all the terrorists and their sympathizers, so they've turned to a Cold War Plan B: Deterrence.
Interviews with more than two dozen senior officials involved in the effort provided the outlines of previously unreported missions to mute Al Qaeda’s message, turn the jihadi movement’s own weaknesses against it and illuminate Al Qaeda’s errors whenever possible.
A primary focus has become cyberspace, which is the global safe haven of terrorist networks. To counter efforts by terrorists to plot attacks, raise money and recruit new members on the Internet, the government has mounted a secret campaign to plant bogus e-mail messages and Web site postings, with the intent to sow confusion, dissent and distrust among militant organizations, officials confirm.
At the same time, American diplomats are quietly working behind the scenes with Middle Eastern partners to amplify the speeches and writings of prominent Islamic clerics who are renouncing terrorist violence.
Officials, the story makes clear, would rather be killing terrorists. But apparently that doesn't work by itself.
So we get this:
“Obviously, hard-core terrorists will be the hardest to deter,” Mr. Vickers said. “But if we can deter the support network — recruiters, financial supporters, local security providers and states who provide sanctuary — then we can start achieving a deterrent effect on the whole terrorist network and constrain terrorists’ ability to operate."
I've often been critical of the Bush Administration -- and conservatives generally -- for not seeming to recognize these concepts. Today, at least, I offer praise.














Thoughts
Re: Patronization
Submitted on March 18th, 2008 by JoelUm, anon, a series of dictionary entries does not an argument make. Mind elaborating a little bit here?
"Patronization". Look into
Submitted on March 18th, 2008 by Anonymous"Patronization". Look into it.
Re: Tragically mistaken
Submitted on March 18th, 2008 by JoelOnly time will tell, Anon.
But I believe that Bush et al, while they've been largely mistaken about how to confront terrorism, do genuinely want to protect America from said terrorism -- and that, over time, they'll drift toward whatever is effective, no matter their ideological predisposition.
I might be an optimist, though.
You are so tragically mistaken.
Submitted on March 18th, 2008 by AnonymousIt's called "dissimulation". Look into it.