Obama's answer to Wright
Posted 1 year 47 weeks ago byBarack Obama responds to Jeremiah Wright's "God damn America" sermon, in an interview with the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:
Q: I don't know if you've seen it, but it's all over the wire today (from an ABC News story), a statement that your pastor (the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's South Side) made in a sermon in 2003 that instead of singing "God Bless America," black people should sing a song essentially saying "God Damn America."
A: I haven't seen the line. This is a pastor who is on the brink of retirement who in the past has made some controversial statements. I profoundly disagree with some of these statements.
Q: What about this particular statement?
A: Obviously, I disagree with that. Here is what happens when you just cherry-pick statements from a guy who had a 40-year career as a pastor. There are times when people say things that are just wrong. But I think it's important to judge me on what I've said in the past and what I believe.
Lame.
Lame, lame, lame.
OK, yes, Obama is the candidate, not Wright. So voters need to judge Obama's record. Trouble is, Obama's record is either thin or unflattering, depending on where you look. So in an effort to take the measure of the man, we look at Obama's friends and mentors.
Hope and change? Obama is hoping somebody will change the subject.














Thoughts
Hoodwink
Submitted on March 15th, 2008 by dots"...he's hoped to win the war in Iraq and shown the sound judgement to win it with us."
Oh, come on, Chuck. The hoodwinkiest hoodwink of them all is that there is a "war" in Iraq that we can "win." This over simplification of a complex situation is an insult to every voter with a brain.
But as far as Obama or anyone else in this cycle throwing their supporters under the bus, I have an oversimplification for y'all. There is anger in this country. Every candidate in this race has distanced themselves from those that express their brand of anger in their candidate's name. I call gutless on every one of them, including Senator McCain.
How can anyone effect any sort of unification without acknowledging the separations between us?
How McCain Will Defeat Obama
Submitted on March 15th, 2008 by Chuck_JohnsonObama is banking on hoodwinking the American electorate.
He makes several claims -- that he's a uniter, not a divider, that he's for bipartisanship, and that hope will win the day.
Luckily for the Republicans, John McCain can tread the water on this one.
He actually has joint-pieces of legislation that are bipartisan and he's hoped to win the war in Iraq and shown the sound judgement to win it with us.
Obama is ranked the most liberal senator in the country by the National Journal.
-----------------------------
Chuck Johnson is a student at Claremont McKenna College. Feel free to contact him.
like Power??
Submitted on March 15th, 2008 by sunshine308I must add that Obamanites always have the same way of dealing with criticism of Obama and serious comments about his qualifications for this office and his lack of good judgement.. they simply prefer to attack Hillary rather than to try to defend what is being said about Obama!!! If he is so great.. tell us something that will deter from the seriousness of these charges.. attacking Hillary which has been done to the nth degree over a period of about 20 years .. does not change the facts of what these charges are..it's just your attempt at a smoke screen.. doesn't cut the mustard.
Hillary and the Secret Service
Submitted on March 14th, 2008 by Jim LakelyI've had beers with Secret Service guys when I worked in Washington. I even have a cap from a guy as a gift. I can vouch for your friend's assessment. Never was a bad word said about Laura Bush, or the president for that matter. Indeed, the plum assignment was to travel with the current First Lady. Enjoyable for all involved. Mrs. Bush and the president have respect for what the Secret Service is charged to do -- and for other "little people" who make this country work.
Hillary ... very much not so much.
Irrelevent, but..
Submitted on March 14th, 2008 by AnonymousPower called Hillary a "monster"? Ha! I like Power already. A friend of mine used to work as a secret service agent during the Clinton administration, and said that the Clintons were nasty. They said that Hillary demanded that all the secret service agents turn away from her when she passed them; and that she didn't want them to even look at her because she "didn't want be obligated to aknowledge them". We absolutely CANNOT have the Clintons in the whitehouse again.
Update: Obama's full statement
Submitted on March 14th, 2008 by JoelThe full comment, at HuffPo:
The pastor of my church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who recently preached his last sermon and is in the process of retiring, has touched off a firestorm over the last few days. He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.
Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.
Because these particular statements by Rev. Wright are so contrary to my own life and beliefs, a number of people have legitimately raised questions about the nature of my relationship with Rev. Wright and my membership in the church. Let me therefore provide some context.
As I have written about in my books, I first joined Trinity United Church of Christ nearly twenty years ago. I knew Rev. Wright as someone who served this nation with honor as a United States Marine, as a respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago. He also led a diverse congregation that was and still is a pillar of the South Side and the entire city of Chicago. It's a congregation that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.
Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.
The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church.
Let me repeat what I've said earlier. All of the statements that have been the subject of controversy are ones that I vehemently condemn. They in no way reflect my attitudes and directly contradict my profound love for this country.
With Rev. Wright's retirement and the ascension of my new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss, III, Michelle and I look forward to continuing a relationship with a church that has done so much good. And while Rev. Wright's statements have pained and angered me, I believe that Americans will judge me not on the basis of what someone else said, but on the basis of who I am and what I believe in; on my values, judgment and experience to be President of the United States.
Lame
Submitted on March 14th, 2008 by Jim LakelyPeople keep presuming that, at some point, Obama will disassociate himself with Jeremiah Wright. After all, that's what politicians do – especially in this election season. Once the heat emanating from an out-of-line associate gets too hot, under the bus they go. Hillary tossed Ferrarro (and before that, her New Hampshire co-chair) into the path of the wheels. Obama shoved his foreign policy adviser Power out the door. And these moves are made with the requisite amount of loud and public indignation. “What this person said was an outrage. I don’t believe that crazy thing that was said. That kind of stuff is not what I’m about. I repudiate it, and don’t want people with these views associated with me or my campaign, even in a small and ceremonial way. Blah, blah, blah …”
Yet here we are. Days have passed since the mainstream media finally took notice of Obama’s deep and lasting relationship with a wacko like Wright (who, by the way, is an unofficial campaign adviser like Ferrarro was for Hillary). And all we get is this lame response that he does not agree with some of what Wright says. And Obama expects us to take it at that. He uses the “crazy uncle” line, hoping we’d forget that you don’t pick your family, but you pick your friends – and certainly pick your church. And those selections reflect your judgment.
It is obvious that Obama greatly resents what is going on here. He feels pressured to make a choice between his “spiritual mentor” and his run for the presidency. He sees it as a false choice, an unfair one. And he doesn’t want to make it. Fine. Don’t. That says volumes, too.
Obama will fire and embarrass his friend and foreign policy adviser because she called Hillary “a monster.” He won’t “fire” his pastor – with a public repudiation and a message of get out of my campaign – for blaming America for 9/11 while the rubble still smoked and saying blacks should sing “God Damn America.”
I think that contrast is more telling than Obama realizes. And I think it’s too late to fix the damage that contrast has done.