Waterboarding: A reader tells me why I'm weak

A reader sends me a private message:

Your views of waterboarding show main-street America the reason why you Liberal Democrats are weak on National Defense. Waterboarding wasn't illegal at the time it was being used. It was extremely valuable in obtaining actionable intelligence. Intelligence that saves American lifes. And, as a result of its effectiveness, I say let the technique continue. We are at WAR. Were at war with forces that aren't constrained by any rules or regulations. They kill, that's it.

I'm always interested when anybody justifies a technique because, after all, terrorists wouldn't hesitate to do it. Because, clearly, WWTD should be our moral guide.

But I also think I know why people like my reader are in favor of waterboarding and, more broadly, torture. Terrorism is scary. It's awful. Nobody wants their relatives or countrymen -- or, frankly, our economy -- to be victims of the next attack. So anything that seems like it gives us an edge in preventing that next attack starts to seem justifiable.

And that's where -- morality aside -- I'm very, very skeptical of torture. Because I'm not at all convinced that it gives us the edge we're looking for. Take Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was just charged this week with masterminding the 9/11 attacks. He was one of three people known to have been waterboarded, and yes, he confessed his complicity in that terrible crime.

He also confessed to a lot of other things. Crimes that he probably didn't or couldn't have committed. So sure: Waterboarding gets us information. Getting us useful, accurate and truly actionable intelligence, though, is dubious.

My correspondent writes:

Ask the family of Daniel Pearl what's their take on the subject.

Actually, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to murdering Pearl. But given the laundry list of crimes KSM admitted, it's fair to say Pearl's family sounds skeptical:

After learning of Mohammed's admission, Pearl's parents, Ruth and Judea Pearl, issued a statement Thursday. "It is impossible to know at this point whether Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's boast about killing our son has any bearing in truth," they said.

Indeed. And without knowing whether a claim obtained under torture has any bearing in truth, it's impossible for that information to be useful. It's just noise, obtained at the cost of a piece of our souls.

My correspondent concludes:

That's why I vote Republican. They're tough on terrorism. Democrats are weak.

Toughness is useful, but not as a standalone trait. You've also got to be smart. Otherwise, you're just a bully, flailing blindly at a world you don't understand.