Waterboarding: A reader tells me why I'm weak
Posted 39 weeks 6 days ago byA reader sends me a private message:
Your views of waterboarding show main-street America the reason why you Liberal Democrats are weak on National Defense. Waterboarding wasn't illegal at the time it was being used. It was extremely valuable in obtaining actionable intelligence. Intelligence that saves American lifes. And, as a result of its effectiveness, I say let the technique continue. We are at WAR. Were at war with forces that aren't constrained by any rules or regulations. They kill, that's it.
I'm always interested when anybody justifies a technique because, after all, terrorists wouldn't hesitate to do it. Because, clearly, WWTD should be our moral guide.
But I also think I know why people like my reader are in favor of waterboarding and, more broadly, torture. Terrorism is scary. It's awful. Nobody wants their relatives or countrymen -- or, frankly, our economy -- to be victims of the next attack. So anything that seems like it gives us an edge in preventing that next attack starts to seem justifiable.
And that's where -- morality aside -- I'm very, very skeptical of torture. Because I'm not at all convinced that it gives us the edge we're looking for. Take Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was just charged this week with masterminding the 9/11 attacks. He was one of three people known to have been waterboarded, and yes, he confessed his complicity in that terrible crime.
He also confessed to a lot of other things. Crimes that he probably didn't or couldn't have committed. So sure: Waterboarding gets us information. Getting us useful, accurate and truly actionable intelligence, though, is dubious.
My correspondent writes:
Ask the family of Daniel Pearl what's their take on the subject.
Actually, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to murdering Pearl. But given the laundry list of crimes KSM admitted, it's fair to say Pearl's family sounds skeptical:
After learning of Mohammed's admission, Pearl's parents, Ruth and Judea Pearl, issued a statement Thursday. "It is impossible to know at this point whether Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's boast about killing our son has any bearing in truth," they said.
Indeed. And without knowing whether a claim obtained under torture has any bearing in truth, it's impossible for that information to be useful. It's just noise, obtained at the cost of a piece of our souls.
My correspondent concludes:
That's why I vote Republican. They're tough on terrorism. Democrats are weak.
Toughness is useful, but not as a standalone trait. You've also got to be smart. Otherwise, you're just a bully, flailing blindly at a world you don't understand.














Thoughts
Cameron Fuck Anal Gay Anal Free Adult Free Movie SEX
Submitted on August 31st, 2008 by AnonymousPORN
personal fraud note valentine father of the bride toast warcraft money lens sales advice about network marketing saphire and steele add door hardware link desktop crm remidies for colds bulb by faster grow light squash using acute post symptom withdrawal latter day saints mormon harry potter humor double hh border colles funeral inspirational poems quotes speech art furniture gallery family guy baby basement greenhouse design cheap electric car women seeking men free trial closing technique nlp covert hypnosis selling yarba mate grocery bulk consumer reviews home security monitoring john holmes pills the martha stewarts favorite cookie recipe free instructions on upholstery universityofillinoisbasketball anconda snake superlative list
free brushes for psp7 speed dowload furneral homes wristbands racism in football add binoculars bushnell link open source olap tools inexpensive jewlery illini wonk public places ban smoking printable christmas ornaments american rail pass online money make picket fences holly marie combs henry hudson explorer ladder 1a shoe price comparison corona wish you were here warhammer goblin tactics hocus pocus costume weird slough feg quagmire oh diablo 2 expansion hero editors bones secret society gay hardcore orgy harriet tubman quilts how to read tabs for bass free songwriting tip beginners guide to forex trade cla langley bc vw golf mk 4 owners club michelle robinson truck diesel fuel prices sealand adventurer portable toilet cell cricket lookup phone reverse basket bear cherished day gift teddy valentine escher icon s school chess club how do you know if you jammed your finger account merge brats games for kids mar a lago estate florida sex teen penis swimsuit retail rick steins cafe taiwan food recipes i reject your reality option trading made easy make your own free beat instrumental our generation doll clothes bridgettes hellon syndrome teretts chicago paid focus groups big cena john picture shirley lens watercolor batik painting yeti sports games cute cow cartoon streamer worship ali childhood type faster for free
buy antivirus download cheap
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousHi all
norton antivirus 2005 product key gen bac to bac baculovirus anti free mircosoft.com spyware virus norton anitvirus crack key anti virus 9x java bytevera virus anti order spyware store virus mcafee stinger virus scanner virus scan mcafee free download antivirus gateway appliance
nokia anti virus software free
influenza journal microbiology virus
downloadable free anti virus software
anti good program virus
realtime antivirus
norton antivirus updates 2005
house doctor virus scanner
lc2.html virus
wsn.exe virus
ez anti virus free download
miglior antivirus
crack avg antivirus 7
anit free program virus
hhv 6 virus
causing change foot night sweat sweats temperature virus
Does torture work? Sure it
Submitted on March 8th, 2008 by AnonymousDoes torture work? Sure it does. Does it work well and to our advantage? Absolutley not. It seems that people aren't looking at the long term effects of our actions. Do we really want to be known as the country that uses torture to obtain information? Should we ever be involved in another world war, countries, not just terrorists will remember that we will use any means necessary. So, when our men and women come home raped, beaten or decapitated, will you deem it justifiable? Was it not that countries way of protecting its interests? America's use of torture will have far greater impact than any "valuable" information that we will ever obtain from its use.
Re: Trusting government
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by JoelAnon writes:
And there's the rub. Government serves at our behest, our pleasure, and you and I are both equally entitled -- even obligated -- to weigh in on how we think government should best serve us.
In any case, I've offered up arguments and some evidence that waterboarding and torture are of, at best, dubious efficacy. I'm still waiting to hear the counter-evidence. And assertions aren't evidence.
The needs of the many outwieghs the needs of a few terrorists
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by AnonymousI will also add that I do agree that there will be times, here and there, that this solution is indeed ineffective. As with any problem solving solution, there are going to be fall backs. This is a fact of life that none of us can prevent. However, if the solution does MORE good than harm...well...
So at what point does
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by AnonymousSo at what point does morality become inconsequential? When would necessity be more relevant? How much death on American soil would convince you that life-saving information is more important than morality? Clearly there comes a time to make hard, controversial decisions on matters such as these. When considering the dangerous and violent times that we are living in, who is a better authority for these decisions. You? Bureaucrats who have no war-time experience/education? Perhaps these decisions are best left to the government that we entrust with our safety.
It's easy to condemn and criticize from the comfort of your home, but you would be singing a different tune if the burden fell on you to prevent another major attack on Americans.
If you don't have a solution, don't attack the problem.
Torture has not been dis-proven in its effectiveness. This is strictly an opinion, and one must consider the source of the opinion before coming to a conclusion.
I challenge you to present hard, clear-cut data on the subject that would dis-prove the effectiveness of torture without a doubt. Further, I challenge you to present arguments made not only by sources from the liberal side, but by other communities as well.
Re: The needs of the many
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by JoelI don't deny that many terrorists are willing -- even eager -- to die for their beliefs. And while that's certainly a factor in deciding how to extract information, that doesn't change my first point: The evidence indicates that torture isn't effective. It may even -- in the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- cloud as much or more than it reveals.
And if that's the case, torture isn't merely immoral: It's also foolishly, stupidly counterproductive.
The needs of the many...
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by AnonymousI'd say that first you described apples to oranges, and second you described a scenario in which to prevent a certain way of thinking, not a way to prevent violent events.
First, as was said before, the Muslim extremists are nothing like the Germans from WWII. These are people that truly believe in their hearts, that death is the ultimate goal in life. They would be happy to strap a bomb to their chests just to take one or two Americans with them. One must consider this mind-set when deciding whether or not torture is a "practical" method to extract information that could save lives. Can you really believe that these men would be foolish enough to talk about upcoming attacks in their prison cells? Can you really believe that these men would be happy to "bond" with their enemy over steak? Their government isn't telling them to fight; they fight because they believe in what they're doing. That’s the big difference.
Second, what the Indonesian government did should be praised; I have no argument with that. But you're describing a scenario of infiltration, where people are being recruited. What was asked is if you could describe a method, a truly proven method that would extract important, life saving information from prisoners of war. Describe this, while keeping in mind two things:
1-The mind set of terrorists. Nine times out of ten, their beliefs CAN NOT be changed. It would be foolish, naive and dangerous to think otherwise.
2-These prisoners have already been recruited, refer back to 1.
Re: Boldness
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by JoelSure. These World War II interrogators might be a good place to start:
That's our experience. Here's how Indonesia has been successful in its own fight against Muslim terrorists:
Pretty good examples, I'd say.
Perhaps you would be so bold
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by AnonymousPerhaps you would be so bold as to suggest techniques that would retrieve life-saving information from extremists (who would like nothing more than to die, not live, for their cause)?