Is demographics destiny for America?
Posted 47 weeks 17 hours ago byMore fuel for the immigration debate: The Pew Research Center says immigration will drive the population of the United States sharply upward between now and 2050 -- and will push whites into a minority.
The Hispanic population will triple in size to become 29 percent of an American population of 438 million people. Eighty percent of the increase will be due to immigrants and their U.S.-born children.
What will shifting demographics mean for America's future politics and culture? Ben Boychuk and Joel Mathis, the moderators of RedBlueAmerica.com, weigh in on the issue:
Joel Mathis
Before America was a country, Benjamin Franklin was fretting about immigrants. Pennsylvania was being overrun by ... Germans.
"Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion," Franklin asked in a 1751 essay.
Sound familiar? It should. Over the years, similar sentiments -- about Italians, Irish and now Hispanics -- have been heard during every wave of immigration: New residents cling too tightly to their languages and customs, it is said, refusing to assimilate and become "real" Americans.
Somehow, we've survived and thrived.
The historic pattern is repeating itself today: Pew reports that while just 23 percent of first-generation Latino Americans can carry on a conversation in English, the number rises to 88 percent among their children, and higher yet among their grandchildren. Assimilation is not an instantaneous process, but it it does happen.
So sure: Secure the borders. Crack down on businesses that violate the law. But don't panic. Yes, our new neighbors will change us. We'll change them, too. And, as before, we'll all end up stronger for it.
Ben Boychuk
Should Americans worry that immigrants are changing the country’s demographic make-up? As long as newcomers embrace the principles and institutions of America, there is nothing to fret about. And there’s the rub.
Assimilation doesn't occur by magic. The sentiments voiced by Franklin and others didn't float out into the American discourse and disappear into the ether. And America didn’t just survive and thrive waves of immigration “somehow.” Traditionally, patriotic assimilation happened through a fairly rigorous and unapologetic process of civic indoctrination.
Alexander Hamilton, himself an immigrant from the West Indies, insisted that “the safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on the love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family.” America’s success, Hamilton argued, would depend on "the preservation of a national spirit and a national character" between native born and immigrant alike.
What was true in the young republic two centuries ago remains true for the world’s superpower today. The United States should always be open to anyone who seeks to participate in this great experiment in self-government. But never forget that Americans are made, not born.
(Ben Boychuk and Joel Mathis are moderators of RedBlueAmerica.com. To join the debate, go to redblueamerica.com.)














Thoughts
Re: Demographics
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by JoelAnon writes:
"I've personally encountered many junior high and high school kids who speak only Spanish to each other. It's undeniable that in order to succeed at well-paying jobs a command of English language is essential."
Are these two things mutually exclusive? I point you back to the Pew survey: 88 percent of second-generation Latinos are fluent in English; if they choose to speak Spanish to each other or at home, I'm not sure that it undermines the social fabric of this country in any meaningful way. Anybody have thoughts on that topic?
As for the volume being different: I'm not sure that's true.
* The Irish famine in the 1840s brought us 2 million immigrants at a time when our country was much smaller.
* Another 800,000 Germans arrived in the six years after our Civil War.
* There were another 4 million Eastern Europeans came here between 1880 and 1914.
We're not facing anything new.
Demographics
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by AnonymousYes, we've assimilated waves of immigration before. What's different now is the volume and how much easier it is not to assimilate. Almost every business and government transaction is available in both Spanish and English. Where's the incentive to learn English? There are numerous Spanish language television, radio stations and news papers available. I've personally encountered many junior high and high school kids who speak only Spanish to each other. It's undeniable that in order to succeed at well-paying jobs a command of English lanuage is essential, and some second generation immigrants with ambition and education will attain high incomes and position within society.
But what of those who prefer to remain unassimilated? I'm afraid we'll end up with a large Hispanic population of partially assimilated underclass that could present serious social problems in the future.
Teddy Roosevelt on Hyphenated Americanism
Submitted on February 14th, 2008 by Chuck_JohnsonBeing a hyphenated American is all in vogue in the Left today. Many on the Far Left believe in the notion of "many Americas".
We shouldn't be encouraging hyphenated citizenship.
Teddy Roosevelt said it best.
We ought to end dual nationalities and birthright citizenship and return to a time in our country where we valued citizenship instead of giving it away to anyone who managed to swim or jump over a fence and have a baby.
Jurisprudence is consistent with that interpretation, after all.
casinos
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by kevinkindYour just affraid if you call them what they really are, they will all want to open one.
Mexico City
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by AnonymousObviously there is a large percentage of people in Mexico with a European background - just visit Mexico city. I would say that these comments are an over generalization of the matter.
Native Americans
Submitted on February 13th, 2008 by kevinkindNot Hispanics. I would like some one to perform a DNA test on a control group of migrators entering our country from the south. I don't think we would find very many european \spanish markers. The ones I've met here have the same features of the figures carved on the walls of the achient citys of mexico and central America