Democrats debate: You know you love our live-blogging action
Posted 36 weeks 3 days ago byThat's right. We're live blogging again this evening. There will be no scotch for Joel -- instead he has purchased a beer that tastes like scotch! It's true!
Enough drinking. More politics. Please join our conversation!
Joel 8:43 p.m. CST: Debate’s over. What did we learn?
In a debate format, Clinton sounds more presidential than Obama. I’m not sure that that’s proof of anything. By this time, though, we’ve been through these questions so many times that there’s not much new we learned tonight. So the sounding presidential thing might actually be pretty important.
Ben 8:50 p.m. CST: I liked it better when Clinton and Obama were red in tooth and claw. But that's the partisan in me, I guess.
Ben 8:46 p.m. CST: It's hard to get past that two-for-the-price of one question with Hillary Clinton. And it's a legitimate question. You can tell we're winding down, though. The questions are getting a bit fuzzy around the edges.
Joel 8:43 p.m. CST: Who will win the Shandling primary? The Stevie Wonder primary?
And I think we’ve seen Rob Reiner enough tonight, thanks.
BTW, the proper response to this question to the Hollywood sex-and-violence question is: That has nothing to do with the president’s job.
Ben 8:43 p.m. CST: I missed the question -- the commercial breaks have been poorly timed -- but federal intervention with TV and the Interet is right out...
Hey, there's Rob Reiner again!
Ben 8:41 p.m. CST: How long is this debate? I thought it was only supposed to be 90 minutes. It's gone by quickly, I guess, but I need to get dinner soon!
Joel 8:36 p.m. CST: Booing Wolf. It’s actually a good question. Was she naïve or just making a now-unpopular decision on the merits? It sounds like she’s making the case for being naïve.
And Ben: It's too bad Diane Keaton wasn't on screen when you typed that.
Ben 8:35 p.m. CST: Oh, dear. Now who's naive?
Joel 8:34 p.m. CST: Hillary: “Enormous amount of investigation and due diligence” on Iraq. Oh really?
Asked if she had read (the prewar Iraq National Intelligence Estimate), likely 2008 presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.), said: "I'm not going to say anything about that. Just let the intelligence committee do their work, okay?"
Ben 8:33 p.m. CST: I don't know who the Republican nominee is going to be, but I'm very much looking forward to the debates leading up to the general election. I don't know if it's going to be a clash of the titans, but the contrast between the parties on Iraq couldn't be clearer. But what about the larger war? It isn't just Afghanistan and Pakistan, folks.
Joel 8:31 p.m. CST: Obama does a good job of framing the progress in Iraq – we’re back from horrific violence to merely “intolerable” violence there.
And I agree, to some extent, with Ben. Everybody knew it was a vote to let President Bush start a war, if he chose. It's untrue to suggest otherwise.
Ben 8:27 p.m. CST: If the war vote was as Hillary Clinton just described, then the Congress should have impeached and removed President Bush by now. But the authorization vote was most certainly not as she characterizes it.
Joel 8:23 p.m. CST: Fisher Stevens is alive!
Ben 8:21 p.m. CST: Ron Paul is running ads in California, by the way. On the radio, anyway -- including the 50,000 watt megaphone that is KFI in L.A.
Barack Obama talks about McCain's lack of understanding of foreign affairs. But I'm afraid all I've heard from him just now are clichés and naive platitudes about "serious" problems in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the like.
Joel 8:17 p.m. CST: The giant Ron Paul sign outside the Kodak Theater is something I am not going to make fun of. Ron Paul is a candidate who deserves only our respect.
Joel 8:13 p.m. CST: Diane Keaton! Rob Reiner! Ice T!
And I think it’s fair to say the people meter holds Wolf Blitzer in deep contempt. Based on the CNN feed, btw, I’m pretty sure Wolf sprung that commercial break as a surprise. Cheering was getting out of hand. And he’s right: Let’s hear the candidates.
Ben 8:11 p.m. CST: Question for the panel, knowing Pierce Brosnan is in the audience: Who was the better Bond?
Nice red-meat line from Senator Clinton: It's going to take another Clinton to clean up after another Bush. Does that mean Jeb in '12?
Ben 8:09 p.m. CST: I've stopped keeping track of how many times these two invoke change. I say, banish it!
Joel 8:07 p.m. CST: Jill, down in the comments, is right. The people meter loves Hillary. Barack, not as much. In fact, Wolf said “Senator Obama” – didn’t get a camera shot of Obama, didn’t hear from him. It just plunged. I’m not sure if that reflects Obama and his discomfort in this format, or if these people meter users just love her.
Ben 8:05 p.m. CST: Lord help me, I agreed with the first part of Hillary Clinton's answer about managing the country. I've never, ever liked this idea that the president is CEO of the country. You don't need to be an MBA to be a statesman! In fact, the opposite might well be the case.
Joel 8:04 p.m. CST: That was probably a cheap shot at Karl Rove. But that’s always kind of fun. And I know better than to make fun of Ron Paul anymore.
Ben 8:00 p.m. CST: Karl Rove didn't invent the flip-flopping charge, Joel. I suspect you could find it at the founding of the republic. At the very least, look to Lee Atwater in recent history. And, for what it's worth, I don't think the flip-flop charge amounts to much. People should me more concerned with what these people are going to do for -- or to -- the country.
Joel 7:58 p.m. CST: By the way, this beer – S.P. Dinsmoor’s Scotch Ale – is amazing.
We now return to political blogging.
Joel 7:56 p.m. CST: Here’s where I get angry at Karl Rove. We’ve just sat through five minutes of blather over changed positions – as if changing a position is, in and of itself, bad. It’s what we sat through last night, too. If there was a broad pattern of flip-flopping on big issues, I’d care, but a lot of this ends up being about small changes on relatively minor matters. And , again, the problem isn’t the position itself. It’s the flipfloppery. And it’s tedious.
Ben 7:52 p.m. CST: Did either of the candidates mention that the drivers' licenses issue is essentially a state matter? Maybe I missed it.
Joel 7:50 p.m. CST: That’s the quote that’ll get replayed over and over again
Ben 7:49 p.m. CST: Jesus Christ!
Ben 7:47 p.m. CST: John Podhoretz quips, "Take a million people who are watching this debate, and ask them what Obama and Clinton just said about health care and how their plans differ. My guess: 2 percent would get it right." My guess is I wouldn't be among them.
Joel 7:47 p.m. CST: I’m seriously curious what the economic impact would be if we actually deported 12 million illegal immigrants tomorrow. Assuming jobs could be filled, you’d see prices rise pretty quickly, I think – and Social Security would lose a big chunk of change.
Ben 7:42 p.m. CST: I'm still listening to health care talk. And I've come to the realization that if either one of these candidates win, and if they succeed in getting the reforms they want, it's going to become very dangerous to get sick in this country.
I think I'm going to skip ahead...
Joel 7:40 p.m. CST I had some technical problems of my own. I’m back!
Ben 7:28 p.m. CST: Sorry, due to circumstances beyond my control, I'm about 10 minutes behind in this debate. Thank goodness for TiVo!
Joel 7:20 p.m. CST Actually, healthcare is where I disagree with Obama. You require universal coverage so that healthy people with finances can’t opt out, and there are some of those people. For a couple of reasons – A) you will kill the insurance industry if only the sick expensive people are participating, and B) if something catastrophic happens to those uninsured people, they go to the emergency room. Either option probably leaves you, the taxpayer, paying for them anyway. So you’ll pay for it through the front door or back door. Your choice.
Ben 7:19 p.m. CST: I know this is supposed to be a substantive debate, but I would be remiss if I didn't note that Rob Reiner, Garry Shandling and the great James Brooks are in the house tonight.
Ben 7:15 p.m. CST: Obama speaks sensibly on health care. If you're going to have something like universal healthcare, strong-arming citizens into buying insurance isn't the way to go. His plan seems somewhat less socialistic than hers.
Joel 7:12 p.m. CST “What do you consider the most important policy distinction between you?” OK, that a nice way to start delving into substance.
Joel 7:10 p.m. CST Obama makes his play for the Edwards voters. Nice move.
And he says Hillary is his friend. That’s probably a necessity, given ”Handshakegate.” You probably don’t want that becoming another “You’re likable enough, Hillary” moment.
Ben 7:05 p.m. CST: No rules tonight? That's always death.
It is a moment, Joel. I hope we're at a point in our country that it's remarkable for being unremarkable.
Joel 7:05 p.m. CST Obama and Clinton are alone on stage. And it’s astonishing, really: A black man and a woman. One of the two will represent the Democratic Party for the presidency. I don’t know that it’s worth voting for either one specifically for those reasons, but it’s still a great moment.
Ben 7:02 p.m. CST: If I had half a brain, I would have gone down to the Kodak Theater today. Looks like quite a show. And, as Wolf Blitzer mentioned, this debate is probably going to be Hollywood's big show for the year if the Oscars don't go off.
Joel 7:00 p.m. CST: Stephen Spielberg and Christina Applegate are there tonight! Yes, Hollywood is liberal. Which automatically makes this debate more fun than last night’s.














Thoughts
Did I hear Wolf say debates in Ohio!?
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonYeeha!
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
last question
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Cycle_GeezerCan no one say "Wolf that's a stupid question"?
Bill Clinton's role
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelHas that question been phrased explicitly in that fashion?
ROFL
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonI was too busy liveblogging my reaction at two different blogs to notice! lol Sorry Jim. :)
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
The Hillary cackle
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyPlease, Jill. Don't tell me that the meter went up when she did that.
Sorry, Hillary. Stop dodging this question. State explicitly what role your husband would play in your administration. This issue is simply not going to go away.
No one in that room, or in the country, believes that he'll be in the kitchen hanging out with the help.
... yet again....
BO-GUS
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonThe spouse question is like the Campbell Brown "old boys" question several debates ago. I hate these questions - and I'm very ornery when I'm on back pain meds. ;)
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Censorship isn't the answer
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyI hope a President Obama would keep that in mind when/if a Democratic Congress puts the regeneration of the Fairness Doctrine across his desk.
You realize all the things they didn't mention
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonNothing on education - or did I miss that - NCLB? Nothing on environment? Nothing on competitiveness, jobs?
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Body armor
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyPlease, please, PLEASE stop peddling the myth that Bush sent our boys to war without body armor.
Jim: nail on head
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonWhen you wrote about Obama and the hugging thing that it "was an annoyance." He gets a lot of looks on his face that LOOK like something is annoying - may or may not be, but he gets a look that conveys "I'm annoyed." That's a real problem I think.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
See see Afghanistan
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonSomeone needs to ask Greg Mortenson who he's supporting.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
I have to hug weeping mothers of soldiers
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyI know Obama didn't mean for it to come off this way -- but it sounded like, especially in the tone of his voice, that comforting a grieving mother was an annoyance.
Meanwhile, Obama continues to speak yet say nothing. Saying that you always thought the Iraq War was a bad idea -- when your thoughts on the topic were wholly irrelevant -- has long-since ceased to have impact. Hillary knows it. She's moved on to look forward, he's still trying out old talking points.
Point to Hillary. And, frankly, good for her for not saying her vote was a mistake -- even if her justification for it is complete fiction. It's still not as bad as Edwards' cynical play.
Broken record but O is flatlining
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonIt's so odd - when he spoke in Kansas, he was fabulous - I cannot really understand what it is that dissipates when he sits in these situations.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Hillary, Bush and Iraq
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyBoy, she's knocking this topic out of the park. Independent voters must be loving it. She's effectively straddling, at least rhetorically, supporting the Iraqis yet still getting out of a war zone. It has at least the sheen of responsibility and sounds well-thought-out.
How it would work in practice is another matter, but it is way more responsible than what she has said on the campaign stump to her lefty base. We'll see how serious she is about this issue if she repeats this message outside this theater.
Three Cups of Tea
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonAny of you read that? Very prescient when it comes to Afghanistan and Pakistan right now.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Obama is losing
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyIf this debate is a competency contest, Obama is losing badly. It makes me think that McCain could even overcome Obama's youth and vigor.
Made meter love to Iraq, Jim
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonIt went SKY-high when she was chatting Iraq.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Hillary on Iraq withdrawal
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyShe's at least not being as irresponsible as she has been in the past, and seems genuinely concerned about not leaving our Iraqi allies to be sitting ducks. That's quite a walk down with wiggle room. Good. Good.
But then she makes a hash of it by pretending she can do that yet get everyone out in a year. It's pretty much one or the other.
"As much questioning and debate"
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelWithin the bureaucracy?
Real chick comment
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonI want Pierce Brosnan and Diane Keaton to ask the rest of the questions. For the record.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Re: Scripted
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyWhew! I'd have trouble sleeping at night if I thought she had real political skills.
no biz
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Cycle_GeezerSimply enough, the govt. is not a business. Most businesses are run as military style organizations where decisions flow from the top with little or no questioning. My personal preference is to have the govt. run with as much questioning and debate as possible.
Scripted.
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelShe's used it before. This was just the best response it's gotten.
Re: Drinking Game
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by The Big KlosowskiMaybe you can switch to the phrase "change" and catch up quickly!
drinking game
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Cycle_GeezerYea, I got started too late, the John Edwards references fell off rapidly.
Another Politico question
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyAnd I voted for this one!!! A toughie about the dynastic politics thing.
And Hillary says ... blah.
"We're all judged on our own merits ... and no one comes in with an advantage" (Really! Your name is Clinton, for crying out loud. No advantage in name recognition. None in fundraising? You're having it just a tough as everyone else?)
Yet, in the end, she just delivered maybe the line of the campaign: "It took a Clinton to clean up after the first Bush. It just might take another Clinton to clean up after the last one."
Gold. On the level of Reagan saying that he would not make Mondale's relative youth and inexperience an issue in the campaign.
If that was not scripted, but spontaneous ... we'll, then I need a drink.
Uhhhhgh
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonNot the first woman pres will be a big change card. I hate that.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Re: Scotch
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyHa! I'm well familiar with Scotch Ale. I'm a long-time homebrewer (though it's been too long since my last batch). That's good stuff -- if you like malty beer.
By the way, Hillary just swatted aside another of the questions we could vote on at Politico.com. (the government as a business thing). Too bad. Yet another one I didn't vote for, but was still pretty good.
McCain's presence here
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyKeep talking about working with McCain -- and his toady Lindsay Graham -- Hillary and Barack. That will only help my guy Mitt win on Tuesday.
Scotch
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelScotch Ale, man. Made with a peat malt. Amazing.
But you're right. That's politics, not just Karl Rove. But it's always fun to take a shot at Karl Rove, isn't it?
Joel says ...
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelySo two Democratic candidates go after each other for flip-flopping and the two-years-retired Karl Rove is at fault? Before Karl Rove, candidates didn't go after each other for inconsistency?
Put the bottle down, Joel. If the beer tastes like scotch, it's spoiled.
Re: Drinking game
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelMine was based entirely on hearing the phrase "son of a mill worker." I'm stone sober tonight.
(Not really.)
Multitasking
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonLive-blogging here and at BlogHer's open thread AND watching it on my laptop with the real-time meter. Just thought I'd point that all out. lol
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
debate drinking game
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Cycle_GeezerI've started: every time I hear John Edwards, take a drink.
Barack's debate style
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by BenIf he can't handle Hillary Clinton, how's he going to handle Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
Cheap shot question, I know. I'm going back to the blog now.
People meter
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelYou know, this really isn't Obama's best format. He's good at politicking, but he's not good at debating. I'm not sure how well that translates to good governing -- I've seen George Bush in person and he is, when he wants to be, very quick on his feet.
Slipping into Senator
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonAnyone else catch that? They were all "Barack" and "Hillary" and he is calling her "Senator Clinton"?
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
The Hillary meter
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyI'm not surprised it's jumping, Jill. She's really on her game right now. No shrill shrieking -- even though the audience is clapping, which usually gets her going. And Obama seems to be drifting around a bit in his answers.
where to find real-time meter
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonIf you go to CNN's election page and click on "Watch now: Live on Cnn.com," you should get the pop-up video and on the right-hand side, you can clck on the screen that will let you watch the debate with the meter superimposed.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
The meter loves Hillary
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jill Miller ZimonBarack is just not rocking that dial meter real-time reaction measure.
Jill Miller Zimon
Writes Like She Talks
Re: 'best medical care in the world'
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyI dunno, Joel. I'd rather take my chances in the US, than suffer death by waiting list in Britain.
Scapegoating?
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelySorry, Barack. Illegal immigrants do take the kinds of low-skill jobs that used to be done by America's working poor. If you're saying that's scapegoating, then you need to tell that to some black folks who disagree.
"Best medical care in the world"
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by JoelNope.
That Blacks/immigrants question ...
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyWas among those you could vote for on Politico. I did not vote for it (I don't think). But it's a decent one.
We spend the most on healthcare ...
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyAnd we have the best medical care in the world.
Don't give me these nonsense statistics, Hillary. People aren't beating down the doors of Britain, Spain or Holland to use their hospitals.
Drug companies
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyNice of Hillary to suggest that drug companies should be allowed to be in on the conversation about where the health care industry goes ... before, that is, slamming them for "excessive" profits and the like.
Once a central planner, always a central planner. Newsflash, Hillary: In a free-market economy, you don't get to decide how much money companies can make. Nor do I buy your nonsense about the government carrying most of the water on drug research.
Hillarycare "done in secret."
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyNice one, Wolf! And a disconcerting ... "um" ... at the beginning of Hillary's side-stepping of that one.
Lower premiums
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyIf you really want to do that, Barack, try using the market. Get the customer's money closer to the point of service, and prices will go down.
Hillarycare
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim Lakely"Shared responsibility," yet with no mandates. Riiiiiight.
And can we please stop saying people in America "don't have health care." We all get health care. What we don't all have -- for various reasons -- is a health insurance plan. There's a big difference.
Healthcare
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyObama seemed to talk in circles on that one. I'd say more, but I don't really know what he said -- other than maybe it would be only kinda mandatory?
Ben says ...
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyStill no comfort.
Oversight?
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyI thought that was the duty of the Congress. Ain't you guys been in a Democratic-controlled Congress for a year?
Go to Politico and VOTE ON QUESTIONS
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyAs Wolf noted, Politico's home page includes a link to a window that will let you vote on one of three questions for each candidate in several different issues.
To my surprise, one of the three questions were actually framed from something close to my perspective -- from the right.
It will be very interesting to hear these candidates reply to the questions I voted for, though I doubt those will be the ones that win the voting.
Substantive issues ...
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyWolf just promised. We'll see.
Let's get it on!
Submitted on January 31st, 2008 by Jim LakelyFinally! Mano a ... er ... womano?