redblueamerica.com

Frank Rich puts all of this in devestating perspective for the Clintons and Democrats.

The first time around, the "two for one" deal was cute. Ok, maybe not "cute," but not taken all that seriously. Bill was saying, "you not only get me, but you get the smartest attorney in Arkansas as a bonus" -- in quick-slogan form. And the Baby Boomers, which meant 90 percent of the MSM, just loved it, without bothering to press Bill exactly on what role Hillary would be taking in the administration. And Hillary wasn't offering any specifics about her role at the time, though we discovered later that it wasn't exactly productive.

Obama has started to go after what the downside of "two for one" means this time, with his crack at the last debate about not knowing who he's running against (a great line).

But this much you can bet on: The Republicans, when they get their shot, will go after the Bill/Hillary, Hillary/Bill stuff. Hard. And it will be very effective, especially to independents and "tired of it all" Democrats.

Thank you Joel for bringing up a very important question. If H.Clinton should win how will we know who is running the White House! Can anyone see B.Clinton "The First Man" going to luncheons and discussing how to redecorate the White House. Senator Clinton wasn't able to keep former President Clinton at bay when he was in office and look what happened to "our country". We need a President who is fully committed to all the people and not one who has to spend precious time making sure their spouse does'nt cause some kind of questionable embarrassments. Our country is in real trouble right now for so many reasons that we need a President that won't cause us more harm. We all need to look deep into ourselves and decide if we are willing to go through another Clinton mess. All of our lives depend on this.