Laffer on the stimulus plan
Posted 25 weeks 2 days ago bySupply-side guru Art Laffer weighs in on the Bush stimulus plan in Friday's Wall Street Journal. He's unimpressed. Rather than have the Treasury cut checks, Laffer recommends that Congress cut marginal tax rates again. Quoth Laffer:
With the Kennedy tax cuts of the 1960s, when the highest tax rate fell from to 70% from 91%, the story was the same. When you cut the highest tax rates on the highest-income earners, government gets more money from them, and when you cut tax rates on the middle and lower income earners, the government gets less money from them.
Even these data grossly understate the total supply-side response. A cut in the highest tax rates will increase lots of other tax receipts. It will lower government spending as a consequence of a stronger economy with less unemployment and less welfare. It will have a material, positive impact on state and local governments. And these effects will only grow with time.
Mark my words: If the Democrats succeed in implementing their plan to tax the rich and cut taxes on the middle and lower income earners, this country will experience a fiscal crisis of serious proportions that will last for years and years until a new Harding, Kennedy or Reagan comes along.
Trained economists know all of this is true, but they try to rebut the facts nonetheless because they believe it will curry favor with their political benefactors.














Thoughts
A real Laffer
Submitted on January 25th, 2008 by Jim LakelyFunny. That was exactly the argument -- more or less -- that I made to a non-political colleague at work. And he nodded his head ... and then went on about the stuff he'd buy with his government check (X-box technology was at the top of his list).
Sigh ... Free-market economics is just too hard for most people to grasp. Gimme money? So much easier.