Confederate flag redux
Posted 50 weeks 5 days ago byWhat year is it again? To read the news and blogs about the row over the Confederate flag in South Carolina, one could be forgiven for thinking it was 2000 all over. Only this time it's Mike Huckabee taking up the banner of the Lost Cause.
Let's be clear about why this is an "issue" now: a journalist asked the question. Mike Huckabee did himself no favors by answering it, or answering it as he did: "If somebody came to Arkansas and told us what to do with our flag, we'd tell 'em what to do with the pole, that's what we'd do," Huckabee said. Charming.
The confederate flag is really an arcane debate that cuts several different ways. One's opinion of the flag is supposed to be a litmus test for federalism and state's rights, but it isn't so simple as that. Conservatives -- not just the GOP candidates -- are by no means of one mind on the issue. For an insightful take, I recommend this post and this post by Peter Lawler, as well as the comments, over at No Left Turns. In brief, I agree with Lawler: "I don’t think the Confederate flag is like the Nazi flag or anything like that. But its official display" -- official display, mind you; not guys with stickers on their pickups -- "did become a symbol of racial divisiveness and injustice that it’s best to get past. ...Elections shouldn’t turn on the Confederate flag."














Thoughts
Symbol versus History
Submitted on January 19th, 2008 by bruceI grew up in the South in the 50s and 60s where racial devisiveness was a fact of life but was relatively hidden from public view. My high school had Rebels as its mascot, Dixie as the fight song and a 4 x 8 "stars and bars" flag carried by the cheerleaders. That has since changed to a more PC "Patriots". My point is that despite the flag's history of racial discrimination and current symbol of racial devisiveness, we sometimes get carried away in trying to relive the past sins of our forefathers rather than burying those sins and trying to strengthen and correct our still simmering intolerance for diversity. Yes, I believe that although we have improved in some ways over the past 50 years, we have a long way to go to recognize the strengths of our diversity and allow the Civil War to be an item for the history books and not a symbol of divisiveness. Summarily, although I side with state's rights to a degree, SC ought to bury this symbol and come up with a new flag without fanfare, not in a sense of political correctness, but in a spirit of recognition of our country's origins. Our high school did it and no one can feel hurt by it today.
Racial divisiveness any way you slice it
Submitted on January 18th, 2008 by BenThe choice of verb and tense seems rather less important than the object.
As for Kirchik's point, there was plenty to disqualify Huckabee for the presidency before he uttered a syllable about the Confederate flag.
But, again, the agonizing over this issue seems a complete waste of time and energy. I realize there are plenty of people who are still sore about the Civil War and Reconstruction. But, it seems to me, that question was settled about 130 years ago.
And then there's this...
Submitted on January 18th, 2008 by JoelJames Kirchik isn't a fan.
"Became a symbol of racial divisiveness"
Submitted on January 18th, 2008 by JoelIn South Carolina, it was INTENDED as a symbol of racial divisiveness. And that's during the lifetimes of all the presidential candidates. They should know better; particularly Huckabee.