Archive - Apr 14, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
Police officer with laser
The Associated Press

If he doesn't catch you, the camera on his just might.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Should cameras replace cops to give out speeding tickets?

Motorists sometimes smile as they speed past a police officer who has another hapless driver pulled over. If Beverly Hills, California, officials have their way, motorists will be smiling for a photo radar camera attached to the police car. The idea is to catch more speeders, slow down drivers and -- yes -- collect more traffic ticket revenue.

Read More

Ben likes: Politicians' hubris takes to the open road

Radley Balko/Reason

There's also a measure of hypocrisy to all of this. Gov. Richardson is a staunch supporter of red-light cameras. Mayor Fenty supports his city's red-light and speed cameras, despite the fact that D.C.'s red-light cameras have been plagued by charges of corruption, poor maintenance and the tendency to issue tickets to innocent motorists. Gov. Rendell presided over the installation of the first surveillance cameras in Philadelphia (after, it's worth adding, a $75,000 campaign contribution from the company that was awarded the contract to install them).

All these politicians have supported laws that could generally be seen as anti-motorist, be it allowing for camera surveillance of public roads, increasing fines and punishments for traffic offenses or adding new offenses to the books. All sanctimoniously sign these bills while mouthing high-minded rhetoric about public safety (usually, such bills are more about generating revenue for city coffers). But the minute "public safety" conflicts with their own sense of self-importance, these politicians are quick to dispense with the laws they expect the rest of us to follow.

Read More

Joel likes: Like them or not, we're getting them

Roy Dyson/Southern Maryland Online

As always, I'll be right up front with you. I don't like the whole concept of "Big Brother" speed cameras. But let's call speed cameras what they really are. Speed monitoring cameras are revenue grabbing wolves masquerading in the sheep clothing of public safety.

I am aware that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Governors' Highway Safety Association and several public opinion polls nationwide support the use of speed cameras as public safety tools. Studies show that where speed cameras are located, speeding is reduced by as much as 70%. If speed cameras really reduce traffic injuries and fatalities, of course, I would be foolish to oppose them. However, the statistics on speed cameras ability to deter traffic accidents are mixed.

Few things in the world are certain. But one certainty is that government will give the stamp of approval on just about any new way to take dollars from our pockets. I sincerely hope that the speed cameras turn out to be the effective public safety tools they are proclaimed to be. I know they will turn out to be the lucrative sources of revenue they have proven to be. 

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Bob Nardelli and George W. Bush
The Associated Press

Former Home Depot CEO Robert Nardelli, pictured with President Bush, was a poster boy for "excessive" executive compensation. When Home Depot fired Nardelli in 2006, he walked away with $29.7 million.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Candidates eye CEO pay: Should compensation be a political issue?

John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama agree on precious little. But all three presidential candidates agree that the salaries and compensations of Fortune 500 companies is "outrageous" and "unfair." The only question is what, if anything, government should do about it.

Read More

Ben likes: Leave the CEOs alone

Rich Lowry/National Review

High executive pay hasn't quite reached that status of a bipartisan "crisis," but it's approaching it. The Democratic senator from Virginia, Jim Webb, fulminated against it in his response to President Bush's State of the Union address last year. Bush himself, in a "State of the Economy" speech on Wall Street, urged corporate boards to "step up to their responsibilities" to better manage CEO pay.

CEOs might be paid extremely well, but they don't have easy jobs. Their performance is always evaluated by the inescapable taskmaster, the financial markets. When they are found lacking, they are canned -- witness Kevin Rollins at Dell, out as CEO after just two and a half years. CEOs last on average about six years in their jobs.

There are always examples of excess. The CEO of Home Depot, Robert Nardelli, stoked outrage when he left the company with a $200 million severance package. His contract was a relic of the bull market of 2000, but it was understandable that Home Depot had desperately wanted a highly regarded former GE executive. One theory says that corporate boards of publicly traded companies are too cozy with management, so they dole out excessive pay. This happens sometimes. But companies owned by private-equity firms with a direct stake in their success pay similarly large packages to entice and keep hard-charging CEOs. The market knows what it's doing here. Politicians don't.  

Read More

Joel likes: Chief executives in the house

Anabel Lee/The American Prospect

Since CEOs are guaranteed outsized severance and separation packages regardless of how they or their firms actually perform, they can easily offload risk onto shareholders without enduring adverse personal consequences. When these executives are fired or elect to leave their company, shareholders can only idly stand by and watch hundreds of millions of dollars leave with them.

Supporters of such excessive CEO pay argue that it is driven by a highly competitive market to attract and retain top talent -- talent that would go to even higher paid positions in private equity or hedge funds if executive compensation were to lag behind. While CEO pay plans might initially attract talent, they also indicate to the talent that performance is not relevant. Such compensation programs need serious modification; for starters, they should be redesigned so that promised pay reverts back to the company in cases of bad behavior or performance. Such steps are crucial in the context of increasingly global markets; if shareholders cannot find credible and responsible business leadership here in the United States, their capital will be sent somewhere else.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Gitmo
The Associated Press

A guard stands duty at Guantanamo Bay's prison fo rsuspected terrorists.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Is it time to shut down Guantanamo Bay prison?

A wave of change appears headed toward the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, with all three major presidential candidates vowing to abolish the military prison. And somewhat surprisingly, closing the camp and moving the prisoners to the United States may be the easy part, said U.S. officials, former administration aides and legal experts. But nobody has yet found a way through the legal thicket in the way.

Read More

Ben likes: What follows Gitmo

Ed Morrissey/Hot Air

Closing Gitmo takes no effort at all, but that's only the beginning -- and it reveals that the real issue has never been Guantanamo Bay at all. The real issue, one all three presidential candidates have avoided, is whether we release known terrorists and allow them the opportunity to attack us again.

In closing Gitmo, we have two choices. One would be to ship the detainees to another detention facility outside of the U.S., which would only be a geographical change. It would win us nothing in terms of international approval, and would likely be much less secure than Gitmo. The second choice would be to bring the detainees to the U.S. and either use the civilian courts or get Congress to approve indeterminate detention without trial inside the U.S. -- essentially recognizing the danger the terrorists pose and treating them like we treat them now at Gitmo, using military tribunals instead of courts.

Again, this would only be a change in location, and hardly a salutary one at that for Americans.

Read More

Joel likes: Beyond Guantanamo

Jonathan Hafetz/The Nation

Let's start by stating the obvious: Guantánamo is not just a prison. It is an entirely new kind of penal institution that perfectly embodies the Administration's new paradigm for a never-ending, ubiquitous "war on terror."

At Guantánamo, individuals are held indefinitely as "enemy combatants," a term that conjures images of captured enemy soldiers. In fact, the government's own data shows that the majority of prisoners at Guantánamo never took up arms against the United States or engaged in hostile conduct toward this country. The cells at Guantánamo are full of civilians, many of whom were seized in places like Bosnia and Gambia, thousands of miles from any battlefield.

As they seek to repair the damage and recast the future, America's leaders should look beyond Guantánamo and remember the commitment to justice that made this country great for more than two centuries. The question is not whether America should imprison terrorists. It is whether America will treat all accused persons consistently with its Constitution and values.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Execution chamber
The Associated Press

An execution chamber sits empty, for now.

Featured Topic | Posted 31 weeks 1 day ago

Should the death penalty be extended to child rapists?

American law has long followed an eye-for-an-eye legal standard for the death penalty: Only murderers could be executed. But that may be about to change. This week, the U.S. Supreme Court hears the case of a Louisiana man given the death penalty for raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter.

Read More

Ben likes: Death to child rapists

LaShawn Barber/Townhall.com

Will sentencing child rapists to death deter future child rapes? Of course not, but deterrence isn’t the only reason to mete out the death penalty. The concept of retributive justice underpins our nation’s criminal laws. In our pampered, politically correct, psycho-babbling society, we’ve forgotten that criminals must be punished -- not merely removed from society or rehabilitated -- and punishing criminals is just, whether or not punishment deters future crimes.

Our government is charged with protecting citizens and punishing lawbreakers, and perverts who hurt the most vulnerable citizens should receive harsh punishment. Man’s idea of harsh punishment, however, pales in comparison to God’s. One day each of us will face the ultimate Judge. I hope Kennedy and other child rapists suffer for all eternity in the deepest bowels of hell.

Read More

Joel likes: Creating more victims?

Amicus brief filed by several organizations against sexual violence

Executing child rapists will likely worsen the problem of underreporting that already frustrates efforts to combat sexual offenses against children. The overwhelming majority of sexual abuse is committed by victims’ family members or close family friends. These relationships lead many victims -- as well as family members who witness or suspect the abuse -- to remain silent rather than to report the crime. For example, victims and other family members may fear the consequences of the abuser’s prosecution and incarceration.

Louisiana’s capital rape statute dramatically aggravates this problem. By magnifying the possible effects of a report of child rape, the Louisiana statute will likely ensure that fewer victims are identified and receive treatment -- and that fewer abusers are stopped from continuing to abuse their victims and from victimizing even more children.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote