Archive - Mar 2, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

Hugo Chavez: War leader?

Featured Topic | Posted 24 weeks 2 days ago

Is war looming in Latin America?

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has a knack for belligerent rhetoric. He's threatened to cut off oil to the United States. Now he's threatening to go to war with neighboring Colombia. Chavez on Sunday ordered Venezuela's embassy in Colombia closed and told the military to send 10 battalions to the border after Colombian troops killed a top rebel leader.

Read More

Ben likes: Is Chavez admitting an alliance with FARC?

Ed Morrissey/Hot Air

We saw a hint of this six weeks ago. Chavez demanded that Latin American nations recognize FARC (as well as a few other terrorist groups) as “legitimate armies” despite their track record of kidnapping and drug trafficking. As the Washington Post noted, even allies of Chavez balked at that notion. Now it looks as though Chavez will take Venezuela to war to support these terrorists, hoping to undermine President Alvaro Uribe and the democratic government in Colombia.

Read More

Joel likes: Revolution in Venezuela?

Joaquin Villalobos/The Nation

What Chávez has got wrong is his belief that he has made a revolution when in fact he's simply won some elections. And even those victories are more attributable to an arrogant, bejeweled opposition that lacks mass adherents than to Chávez. This has allowed Chávez to dominate some state institutions and to change some of the rules of the game, but it doesn't give him the leverage needed to impose the sort of drastic ideological sea change he clearly intends.

Nor does Chávez have a revolutionary army. On the contrary, the army has defeated him twice (1992 and 2002). The complicity of the army with Chávez today rests solely on weapons purchases, and that is much more about corruption than about preparing for war. It's exactly this sort of privileged corruption that closes the path to authentic revolutionary change. The Venezuelan military will neither kill nor die for Hugo Chávez.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
health care
The Associated Press

Will they face competition from government?

Featured Topic | Posted 24 weeks 2 days ago

What's next in the health insurance battle?

Anybody who sat through 16 minutes of debate about who -- Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama -- would provide universal health insurance could be forgiven for forgetting that there's still a debate over whether government-backed coverage is a desirable thing. But John McCain has plans of his own, and they don't include government-provided insurance.

Should government offer universal coverage? Or is there a better, market-driven solution?

Read More

Ben likes: The real reformer

Robert Goldberg/The Weekly Standard

McCain's plan is based around patient-centered initiatives that already have broad support among Republicans in Congress. They include letting people buy health insurance nationally instead of only from state-regulated firms; giving people the choice of purchasing coverage through cooperatives or other organizations (churches or civic groups, for example); expanding health savings accounts; and making health insurance portable by giving people tax credits of up to $5,000 per family to buy their own coverage instead of getting it through an employer.

His chief concern is for people to take ownership of their health care.

Read More

Joel likes: The lessons of '94

Ezra Klein/The American Prospect

All the major Democrats currently campaigning have proposed similar health care plans based on three planks: Universal access, an expansion of something like the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program that includes a public insurance option, and the preservation of current insurance choices. This is not, from a policy standpoint, the best way forward. These plans do not fully integrate the system, and initially, they will not do enough to control costs.

But politically, it's close to the only way forward. Those three planks translate into three arguments that will undergird the case for reform: If you like your current health care coverage, nothing will change; if you're not satisfied with your current coverage, you can buy into the same health care plan that members of Congress use; and no matter what you decide, you will have more choices than you have now. That is how health care will be explained.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
The Associated Press

Lest anyone forget, Europe is fighting the terror war, too.

Featured Topic | Posted 24 weeks 3 days ago

Did the Bush administration misjudge "Old Europe"?

Donald Rumsfeld, the former U.S. Secretary of Defense, in 2003 famously referred to Germany and France as "Old" Europe. "You look at vast numbers of other countries in Europe," Rumsfeld said. "They're not with France and Germany on this, they're with the United States."

A few things have changed in five years. France and Germany have pro-U.S. leaders. Europe's economy is strengthening. And several Old European nations are fighting the good fight on the war on terror. Swedish and Norwegian authorities cracked down on terror financing on Thursday, arresting six people and seizing computer equipment from Internet cafes in coordinated raids in Stockholm and Oslo.

Was the Bush administration wrong about Old Europe? Have America's allies and interests changed? Does the U.S. have something to learn from the Continent?

Read More

Ben likes: Look to Sweden?

Henry Olsen/The American

Americans might be surprised to learn that “Old” Europe is actually ahead of us in tackling many of the most vexing domestic policy challenges. Without much fanfare, Sweden, Holland, and other countries known for their social-democratic welfare states have adopted innovative, market-based reforms on issues such as pensions, transportation, and education. What’s more, while U.S. politics remains paralyzed by partisanship, European parties on the left and the right have teamed up to implement free-market policy ideas that are criticized by the American left as extreme.

Read More

Joel likes: 5 Myths About "Sick Old Europe"

Steven Hill/Huffington Post

In the global economy, today's winners can become tomorrow's losers in a twinkling, and vice versa. Not so long ago, American pundits and economic analysts were snidely touting U.S. economic superiority to the "sick old man" of Europe. What a difference a few months can make. Today, with the stock market jittery over Iraq, the mortgage crisis, huge budget and trade deficits, and declining growth in productivity, investors are questioning the strength of the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, analysts point to the roaring economies of China and India as the only bright spots on the global horizon.

But what about Europe? You may be surprised to learn how our estranged transatlantic partner has been faring during these roller-coaster times -- and how successfully it has been knocking down the Europessimist myths about it.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

2008 Democratic Convention

Rocky Mountain News

Ads by Google