Archive - Mar 18, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

New York Gov. David Paterson discusses past marital infidelities as his wife, Michelle Paige Paterson, stands at his side.

Featured Topic | Posted 35 weeks 6 hours ago

Spitzer isn't alone: Why should politics clash with morality?

Power, Henry Kissinger once said, is the ultimate aphrodisiac. And how. A day after Eliot Spitzer's sex scandal propelled him into office, New York Gov. David Paterson revealed Tuesday that he had affairs with a ''number of women,'' including a state employee, but said that does not affect his ability to lead. Meantime, in Michigan, Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick is resisting calls to resign amid allegations of  sexual impropriety involving a city staffer.

Read More

Ben likes: Morality and Spitzer

Theodore Dalrymple/City Journal

Elizabeth Pisani, an epidemiologist and blogger, has just published an article in the Guardian entitled “Spitzer’s true folly: A governor who pays for sex should know to mould social policies on reality, not morality.” Spitzer’s true folly is not that he let morality mold the social policies he advocated; all social policies are molded by morality. But Pisani’s article illustrates -- not intentionally -- the wisdom of Confucius’s desire that above all, things should first be called by their proper names, and of his perception of the dangers that lurk when they are not.

Read More

Joel likes: Against sexual scandal

Lauren Berlant/The Nation

It's not really even a good opportunity for dancing in the streets because one more powerful person has come tumbling down. After all, some powerful people are better than others, and when powerful people fall from the mighty, naughty force of their appetites, nothing about power is changed at all--quite the contrary. The law, the family, marriage--exit polls suggest that all of these will be the winner here, after being horribly maligned by a man who forgot his oaths to honor them.Instead, what stories like this really do is to damage the reputation of sex. Whenever there's a sex scandal, I feel sorry for sex. 

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Artist rendering of oral arguments against Washington D.C.'s handgun ban
The Associated Press

An artist's rendering of Tuesday's oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging Washington D.C.'s handgun ban.

Featured Topic | Posted 35 weeks 15 hours ago

High noon at the High Court: Is gun ownership an individual right?

If it goes without saying that the nation is divided over gun laws, the Supreme Court certainly seemed to mirror that split during arguments today challenging the District of Columbia's stringent gun control law. Though many justices appeared to lean in favor of an individual right under the Second Amendment, they diverged over whether such a decision would still allow D.C.'s handgun ban to stay in place.

Is gun control constitutional? Should the justices affirm the individual right to own guns? Or should cities have the power to ban guns in order to fight crime?

Read More

Ben likes: Gun-rights showdown

Randy Barnett/Wall Street Journal

Although the implications of striking down the D.C. gun ban are limited, a decision upholding an unqualified individual right in Heller would still be a significant victory for individual rights and constitutionalism. To shrink from enforcing a clear mandate of the Constitution -- as, sadly, the Supreme Court has often done in the past -- would create a new precedent that would be far more dangerous to liberty than any weapon in the hands of a citizen.

Read More

Joel likes: The view from Cambridge

Lawrence Tribe/SCOTUS Blog

It is true that some liberal scholars like me, having studied the text and history closely, have concluded, against our political instincts, that the Second Amendment protects more than a collective right to own and use guns in the service of state militias and national guard units. Opponents of the District’s flat ban on handgun possession have cited my words to the court and in newspaper editorials in their support.

But nothing I have discovered or written supports an absolute right to possess the weapons of one’s choice. The lower court’s decision in this case -- the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found the District’s ban on concealable handguns in a densely populated area to be unconstitutional -- went overboard. Under any plausible standard of review, a legislature’s choice to limit the citizenry to rifles, shotguns and other weapons less likely to augment urban violence need not, and should not, be viewed as an unconstitutional abridgment of the right of the people to keep or bear arms.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote
Barack Obama
The Associated Press

Did he make his case?

Featured Topic | Posted 35 weeks 21 hours ago

Obama's speech: Can we overcome the legacy of racism?

After days of controversy about his connections to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama today went to Philadelphia to give a speech on race relations in America.

Listen to Ben and Joel discuss the speech in today's podcast.

Read More

Ben likes: Obama in Philly

Drew Cline/The Corner

What first strikes me in Barack Obama's speech today is the image of a black American standing across the street from where the Constitution was negotiated in part by slave owners — and not condemning the Founders, but praising them. Here he was noting the stain of slavery, but not letting it become the story of the Founders, but only a part of the story, not letting it press out the reverence the Founders are due.

Read More

Joel likes: The speech

Andrew Sullivan/The Daily Dish

It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.

And it was a reflection of faith -- deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America -- its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union -- today, in our time, in our way.

Bill Clinton once said that everything bad in America can be rectified by what is good in America. He was right - and Obama takes that to a new level. And does it with the deepest darkest wound in this country's history.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
The Associated Press

The markets are stressed.

Featured Topic | Posted 35 weeks 1 day ago

Wall Street or Main Street: Who wins and who loses with the Bear Stearns buyout?

At some point, Wall Street will recover from the current financial crisis, and investors will wax nostalgic about the market bottom that presented a great buying opportunity. Of course, shareholders in Bear Stearns, the venerable investment bank, might be wondering about the upside of losing most of their investment this week in a government-backed buyout by J.P. Morgan.

And given the growing crisis, what about the average American who may have a few thousand dollars in a 401(k), and hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in a home mortgage? No bailout is forthcoming.

Read More

Ben likes: Was Bear Stearns a sacrificial lamb?

Larry Kudlow/National Review Online

Let’s not forget that it’s the private sector that drives our great economy towards success. Prosperity-killing actions from Washington, like tax hikes, trade protectionism, or massive over-regulation, would certainly stunt the long-run health of the economy.

Ultimately, market prices in the housing sector must adjust. That is the only viable solution. And while some families will be forced to become renters, other families will have a chance to purchase a new home at affordable prices. Capitalism is all about winners and losers, and it’s the market that must drive the adjustment, not the government.

Read More

Joel likes: Help for Wall Street, not your street

David M. Abromowitz/Center for American Progress

Maybe it is not so mysterious, though, that the Bush administration could simultaneously scold defaulting homeowners for the sin of striving to join the "ownership society" promoted so vigorously by the president until recently, while reversing course to drop all pretense of personal responsibility when a large financial house is at the brink. It seems to be all a question of vision, of who matters in the end in the priorities of an ideology-driven White House.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote