Archive - Mar 10, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
The Associated Press

Sure, people are working, but is growth halting?

Featured Topic | Posted 25 weeks 5 days ago

Are Americans better off now than they were four years ago? How about 30?

If history is a reliable guide, the recession of 2008 is now unavoidable. Or is it? Trouble is, history is often not the most reliable of guides. At least, not lately.

Yet the dismal jobs report released last week showed overall employment to be lower than it was three months ago. Every time such a slump has occurred since the early 1970s, a recession has followed -- or already been under way.

So, the question is, is the U.S. economy tanking? Has it been tanking all along? Have the economic successes of previous years been illusory? Are Americans really better off than they were four years ago? Or is the economic picture worse than we think?

Read More

Ben likes: The inequality myth

Brad Schiller/Wall Street Journal

That broad swath of economic advancement shows up in personal consumption. According to the Labor Department, personal consumption spending has risen by $2.5 trillion since 2000. More Americans own homes and new cars today than ever before, despite slowdowns in both industries. Laptop computers, iPhones and flat-panel TVs are fast becoming necessities rather than luxury items.

The average American household is doing pretty well. The evident gap between income realities and political rhetoric may help explain why the "two Americas" theme, first asserted by John Edwards and since echoed by Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama, may ultimately fail to resonate with voters. On Election Day, voters may well turn to the candidate with the greater focus on a strong economy that increases everyone's income.

Read More

Joel likes: Our three-decade recession

Robert Costanza/Los Angeles Times

The news media and the government are fixated on the fact that the U.S. economy may be headed into a recession -- defined as two or more successive quarters of declining gross domestic product. The situation is actually much worse. By some measures of economic performance, the United States has been in a recession since 1975 -- a recession in quality of life, or well-being.

Once Americans' well-being becomes the basis for measuring our success, other reforms should follow. We should tax bads (carbon emissions, depletion of natural resources) rather than goods (labor, savings, investment). We should recognize the negative effects of growing income disparities and take steps to address them.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Climate change
The Associated Press

Bad for the environment?

Featured Topic | Posted 25 weeks 6 days ago

Is it time to wean ourselves from fossil fuels?

New studies suggest both industrialized and developing nations must wean themselves off fossil fuels by 2050 -- or global warming could dry up water sources across the planet.

"The question is, what if we don't want the Earth to warm anymore?" asked Carnegie Institution senior scientist Ken Caldeira, co-author of a paper published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. "The answer implies a much more radical change to our energy system than people are thinking about."

Read More

Ben likes: Completely objective journalism

Jim Manzi/The American Scene

Naturally, The Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin has a “narrative” for why the world seems to resist the manifestly correct course of action so stubbornly. She says that “some climate researchers who back major greenhouse gas reductions said it is unrealistic to expect policymakers to think in terms of such vast time scales.” She then quotes two climate researchers who say nothing about this subject. Finally, we get to a philosophy professor who gives her what she wants, when he says that global warming “is a classic inter-generational debate, where the short-term benefits of emitting carbon accrue mainly to us and where the dangers of them are largely put off until future generations.”

How can we be so selfish? I guess American democracy just can’t handle the complexity of the issue. We need a Leader who can get us past this petty squabbling and Take Action.

Read More

Joel likes: First, step up

Bill McKibben/Yes!

Here’s the political reality check, just as sobering as the data about sea ice and drought: China last year passed the United States as the biggest emitter of carbon on Earth. Now, that doesn’t mean the Chinese are as much to blame as we are -- per capita, we pour four times more CO2 into the atmosphere. And we’ve been doing it for a hundred years, which means it will be decades before they match us as a source of the problem. But they are growing so fast that there’s no way to head off this crisis without their participation. And yet they don’t want to participate, because they’re using all that cheap coal not to pimp out an already lavish lifestyle, but to pull people straight out of deep poverty.

Which means that if we want them not to burn their coal, we’re going to need to help them -- we’re going to need to supply the windmills, efficient boilers, and so on that let them build decent lives without building coal-fired power plants.

Which means, in turn, we’re going to need to be generous, on a scale that passes even the Marshall Plan that helped rebuild post-World War II Europe. And it’s not clear if we’re capable of that any more -- so far our politicians have preferred to scapegoat China, not come to its aid.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Eliot Spitzer and family
The Associated Press

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, shown with his wife and three daughters, has been linked to a prostitution ring.

Featured Topic | Posted 25 weeks 6 days ago

New York governor linked to prostitution ring: What's the fallout?

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, often discussed in Democratic Party circles as a future candidate for president, revealed Monday that he is linked to a high-priced prostitution ring, according to the New York Times. Spitzer is reportedly planning to resign the office he's held for just over a year. (Update: Or maybe not.)

Spitzer spent years cultivating the image of a crusader against corruption. In announcing he would run for governor, Spitzer said "we need reform in the process of government." His campaign slogan was "Day One: Everything Changes!"

Do a politician's sexual scandals matter? Should Spitzer's association with illegal prostitution disqualify him from holding office ever again?

Read More

Ben likes: Spitzer's nemesis

James Freeman/Wall Street Journal

In a January 2007 telephone call, Republican State Assemblyman and minority leader Jim Tedisco complained to Mr. Spitzer that he had been shut out of discussions on a new ethics law. According to Fred Dicker's report in the New York Post, Mr. Spitzer then screamed into the phone, "Listen, I'm a [bleeping] steamroller, and I'll roll over you and anybody else." Continuing his telephonic tirade, Mr. Spitzer shouted, "I've done more in three weeks than any governor has done in the history of the state."

Read More

Joel likes: Spitzer, you have ruined your career

"We Could Be Famous" blog

Progressives have worked so hard to elect Democrats to represent our demands for ethics reform -- this is a slap in the face to everyone that has contributed money to the party in the hopes that they would represent our values on this matter.

Progressives that champion transparency, ethics, and accountability in government should feel betrayed. New York Democrats will have a lot of work to do to regain the trust, not just of average New York voters, but also of core constituents.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
PharmaWater
The Associated Press

What's in there?

Featured Topic | Posted 25 weeks 6 days ago

Is your drinking water full of Prozac and birth control?

A vast array of pharmaceuticals -- including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones -- have been found in the drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans. The concentrations of these pharmaceuticals are tiny, far below the levels of a medical dose. And utilities insist their water is safe.

What's in your water? Should you be concerned?

Read More

Ben likes: Dirty water

Michael Fumento/Reason

Supposedly one of the most damning aspects of the chlorinated water-cancer connection is that to the extent the studies show any correlation at all, it is a "dose-response" correlation, meaning the more chlorinated water people drank the more likely they were to get cancer. But that's exactly what you'd expect if recall bias were a problem. In any event, University of California, Berkeley biologist Bruce Ames has noted that if there is any risk of cancer from chlorinated water at all, it is one-thirtieth that of a serving of peanut butter.

Such small risks look trivial amid the death tolls in Peru and elsewhere. And Enrique Ghersi hopes the Unit ed States can learn from his country's mistake. "We're ahead of the U.S.," Ghersi told me sarcastically. "And have returned to the Middle Ages as a result.

Read More

Joel likes: Was Gen. Ripper right?

Adam Dubbin/The Sequitur

So you may be asking yourself, "How do the drugs get into the water supply?" The answer is very simple: humans consume drugs, which are only partially metabolized then excreted in the urine (and also in perspiration), and then returned into the water cycle via metropolitan sewer services. Believe it or not, even after treatment some of these residual chemicals remain, albeit it in the parts per billion or trillion, well below the doses used clinically.

Perhaps this is just another side-effect of our pill-popping culture. But just because they exist in trace amounts does not mean that they are harmless. There have been some studies that suggest birth control hormones that have found their way into local environments have had adverse affects on fish, reptiles and amphibians. Unfortunately, there is no present data to determine what effects these trace chemicals might have.

Read More

How readers are voting

your vote
average
vote