Archive - Feb 9, 2008 - topic

Date
Type
Mike Huckabee
The Associated Press

Mike Huckabee won big in Kansas. Is it too late to challenge McCain?

Featured Topic | Posted 40 weeks 3 days ago

Huckabee: In it to win it?

Maybe it's early to start fitting John McCain for the Republican crown. Mike Huckabee -- who has refused requests to withdraw from the GOP race -- beat McCain handily in Saturday's Kansas caucus, by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

Is the GOP race still open? Is Huckabee's win an isolated event, or does it signify that McCain still has big troubles with the Republican base?

Read More

Ben likes: Huck, for the long haul

John O'Sullivan/National Review

We may see Huckabee in the race till after the Texas and Ohio primaries and, if he wins them, maybe well beyond.

He does well by running against the establishment, it seems to me, and the longer he stays in by winning or doing respectably, the more he builds up his reputation for 2012. After all, suppose he ends up with more delegates than Romney?
That is now quite likely. Huckabee is getting his own votes, the votes of all those dubious about McCain who don't want Ron Paul, and the votes of those who simply want the race to continue—people who, like Huckabee himself, are having fun.

Read More

Joel likes:Kansas

Kevin Drum/Political Animal

What a blowout. Usually, even among true believers, you expect a party to rally around its presumptive nominee. But Kansas Republicans weren't buying, and they weren't content just to show a pro forma lack of enthusiasm. They crushed McCain like a bug, voting for Huckabee 60%-24%. Hell, "other" almost beat McCain.

There's no point in making too much of this. McCain is going to win the nomination and the party faithful will support him. But it's going to be a fight for McCain to win their love, and that fight might well keep him from broadening his appeal to the middle. Come November, liberals might not be the only ones asking What's the Matter With Kansas?

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
writers strike
The Associated Press

The return of the writers would save the Oscars.

Featured Topic | Posted 40 weeks 3 days ago

The writers will return. Will the viewers?

Finally: Maybe we'll soon get new episodes of "Bionic Woman" again. The writers strike appears to be over, with writers gaining payments for episodes and movies that are streamed online.

TV viewers have had three months to get used to life without the writers. Will they come back to old favorites?

Read More

Ben likes: Accelerating a trend

John Whiteside/The Opinionated Marketers

The question, of course, is whether those viewers will come back. There’s precedent for thinking that they won’t.

During the last writers’ strike 20 years ago, about 10 percent of network TV viewers never returned, with most of them going to subscription cable channels such as HBO.

Cable channels then, interactive media now? We all know that there’s been a steady move of consumer attention and advertising dollars away from traditional media like television toward online and interactive. It’s possible that the writers’ strike has given that existing a trend a boost.

Read More

Joel likes: When politicians go pop

Stephen King/Entertainment Weekly

Are TV viewers' habits changing because of the writers' strike? Many reporters who cover entertainment — some at this very periodical — think they are, and that if the strike doesn't end soon, the changes will accelerate. One change they've noted is the ever larger number of TV watchers who are tuning in to coverage of the campaign (which already feels four centuries old). The switch is partly because scripted TV episodes are in increasingly short supply, but it's also because...damn, people are just interested.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
barack Obama
The Associated Press

Barack Obama has taken his message to the pulpit.

Featured Topic | Posted 40 weeks 3 days ago

Faith and politics: Will 2008 bring a new clash?

After years of conceding the "Christian vote" to Republicans, Democrats are competing this year for believers. It's a struggle reflected in a rash of new books examining the influence of faith on American politics -- and questioning whether either political party has much to offer the "values voter."

Can Democrats compete for such voters? Should they?

Read More

Ben likes: Crises of faith

Ross Douthat/The Atlantic

Liberals have spent much of the past six years straining to cut into the GOP’s advantage among religious voters. But when the Democrats finally shattered the Republican majority in the 2006 midterms, it was their consolidation of the secular vote that helped put them over the top. Despite all their efforts to close the God gap, the Democrats managed barely any gains among frequent churchgoers last November—but their share of the vote among Americans who never attend church at all leaped to 67 percent, from 55 percent in 2002.

Read More

Joel likes: Is there a great awakening?

Q&A with Jim Wallis

The framework of religion and politics in 2008 will be dramatically different than in 2004. There are two things. First, what Time magazine called the leveling of the praying field. ... Democrats have been doing much more faith outreach than they ever have before, and even more than Republicans are.

But if the agenda of faith communities haven't changed, that wouldn't be of importance. The agenda has changed dramatically. Survey data show that of white evangelicals, half are conservative, solidly. So half is in play this time. They're not automatically liberal Democrats by any stretch. But whichever candidate speaks a moral language, addresses these issues, is going to have a resonance.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote
Bill Clinton
The Associated Press

He can promote, but not defend.

Featured Topic | Posted 40 weeks 4 days ago

Has Bill Clinton learned his lesson?

Bill Clinton has seen the error of his ways. "I think I can promote Hillary but not defend her because I was president. I have to let her defend herself or have someone else defend her," Clinton said in an interview with a Maine television station.

Has Bill Clinton learned his lesson? Will it help or hurt his wife if he can't play the attack dog role?

Read More

Ben likes: The Bubba factor

Fred Barnes/ The Weekly Standard

What didn't work was having Bill campaign with Hillary, speaking before his wife at events and introducing her. That was tried earlier in Iowa and of course she lost the caucuses there in what feels like an eternity ago but was actually only three weeks ago. At joint events, he overshadowed her and spent much of his time talking about himself. This prompted a newspaper cartoon with a tiny Hillary standing on the shoulder of a huge Bill. Now they appear separately.

And they seem to understand Bill's unique value in the campaign. As an ex-president he can command extensive media attention. What he says gets widespread coverage. In effect, he has a megaphone as big as his wife's, maybe bigger. No other presidential candidate has a surrogate like Bill Clinton. Obama certainly doesn't.

Read More

Joel likes: How he's destroying a legacy

Chuck Lippstreu/Huffington Post

Even Bill Clinton knows he went a bit too far.

His L.A. church tour this week, coupled with the general feeling that an invisible leash has been put around the former president's neck, come as clear indicators of a big "whoops" revelation the weekend before Super Tuesday.

In the coming months, Bill will likely regain (almost) all the respect he lost over the last few weeks from Democratic voters who remember a very different, exponentially more affable man from the 1990s. He deserves that opportunity; his contribution to U.S. policy and his abilities as a statesman were too great during his presidency to burn him at the stake for getting too enthusiastic about his wife's candidacy.

Read More

How readers are voting

average
vote